骨髓抽吸浓缩液(BMAC)在骨科手术中的应用仍然值得商榷。

IF 4.4 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Carl K Schillhammer
{"title":"骨髓抽吸浓缩液(BMAC)在骨科手术中的应用仍然值得商榷。","authors":"Carl K Schillhammer","doi":"10.1016/j.arthro.2025.01.060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite multiple advancements in rotator cuff repair fixation and technique that have allowed for stronger and more anatomic constructs, failure remains commonplace. As is a common theme throughout orthopaedics, both biomechanics and biology play a role in successful healing. The new frontier in tendon-to-bone healing appears to be pairing biologic augmentation, such as bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC), with previous biomechanical advancements. However, only 8 studies have specifically investigated the utility of BMAC in rotator cuff repair, and as of yet, there are minimal data to suggest that recent biologic technologies have shown clinical effectiveness. The technology has been more comprehensively studied in knee arthritis with similarly disappointing clinical results. Rotator cuff repair outcomes are dependent on many factors inherent to the injury (e.g., chronicity, bone quality, tendon quality, retraction), the patient (e.g., age, smoking, diabetes, adherence to postoperative protocol), and the surgeon (e.g., quality of technique, repair tension, patient education). Trying to decide the efficacy of BMAC or other cell-based technology is going to be very difficult.</p>","PeriodicalId":55459,"journal":{"name":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Editorial Commentary: Utility of Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate in Orthopaedic Surgery Remains Questionable.\",\"authors\":\"Carl K Schillhammer\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.arthro.2025.01.060\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Despite multiple advancements in rotator cuff repair fixation and technique that have allowed for stronger and more anatomic constructs, failure remains commonplace. As is a common theme throughout orthopaedics, both biomechanics and biology play a role in successful healing. The new frontier in tendon-to-bone healing appears to be pairing biologic augmentation, such as bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC), with previous biomechanical advancements. However, only 8 studies have specifically investigated the utility of BMAC in rotator cuff repair, and as of yet, there are minimal data to suggest that recent biologic technologies have shown clinical effectiveness. The technology has been more comprehensively studied in knee arthritis with similarly disappointing clinical results. Rotator cuff repair outcomes are dependent on many factors inherent to the injury (e.g., chronicity, bone quality, tendon quality, retraction), the patient (e.g., age, smoking, diabetes, adherence to postoperative protocol), and the surgeon (e.g., quality of technique, repair tension, patient education). Trying to decide the efficacy of BMAC or other cell-based technology is going to be very difficult.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55459,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2025.01.060\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2025.01.060","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管肩袖修复固定和技术的多次进步已经允许更强和更多的解剖结构,失败仍然是常见的。作为整个骨科的共同主题,生物力学和生物学在成功愈合中都起着重要作用。肌腱到骨愈合的新前沿似乎是配对生物增强,如骨髓抽吸浓缩液(BMAC)与以前的生物力学进步。然而,只有8项研究专门研究了BMAC在肩袖修复中的应用,到目前为止,很少有数据表明最近的生物技术已经显示出临床有效性。该技术在膝关节关节炎中得到了更全面的研究,但临床结果同样令人失望。肩袖修复的结果取决于损伤固有的许多因素(慢性、骨质量、肌腱质量、回缩等)、患者(年龄、吸烟、糖尿病、对术后方案的依从性等)和外科医生(技术质量、修复张力、患者教育等)。试图确定BMAC或其他基于细胞的技术的功效将是非常困难的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Editorial Commentary: Utility of Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate in Orthopaedic Surgery Remains Questionable.

Despite multiple advancements in rotator cuff repair fixation and technique that have allowed for stronger and more anatomic constructs, failure remains commonplace. As is a common theme throughout orthopaedics, both biomechanics and biology play a role in successful healing. The new frontier in tendon-to-bone healing appears to be pairing biologic augmentation, such as bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC), with previous biomechanical advancements. However, only 8 studies have specifically investigated the utility of BMAC in rotator cuff repair, and as of yet, there are minimal data to suggest that recent biologic technologies have shown clinical effectiveness. The technology has been more comprehensively studied in knee arthritis with similarly disappointing clinical results. Rotator cuff repair outcomes are dependent on many factors inherent to the injury (e.g., chronicity, bone quality, tendon quality, retraction), the patient (e.g., age, smoking, diabetes, adherence to postoperative protocol), and the surgeon (e.g., quality of technique, repair tension, patient education). Trying to decide the efficacy of BMAC or other cell-based technology is going to be very difficult.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
17.00%
发文量
555
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: Nowhere is minimally invasive surgery explained better than in Arthroscopy, the leading peer-reviewed journal in the field. Every issue enables you to put into perspective the usefulness of the various emerging arthroscopic techniques. The advantages and disadvantages of these methods -- along with their applications in various situations -- are discussed in relation to their efficiency, efficacy and cost benefit. As a special incentive, paid subscribers also receive access to the journal expanded website.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信