REBOA为远程损伤控制复苏和与时间赛跑。

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Current Opinion in Anesthesiology Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-13 DOI:10.1097/ACO.0000000000001474
Max Marsden, Robert Lendrum, Zane Perkins, Ross A Davenport
{"title":"REBOA为远程损伤控制复苏和与时间赛跑。","authors":"Max Marsden, Robert Lendrum, Zane Perkins, Ross A Davenport","doi":"10.1097/ACO.0000000000001474","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>The management of noncompressible haemorrhage (NCH) remains a critical challenge in trauma care, with early mortality rates persistently high despite advances in trauma systems. Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta (REBOA) has emerged as a potential intervention to address severe haemorrhage in prehospital and hospital settings. This review examines the role of REBOA in remote damage control resuscitation, focusing on the 'golden hour' and the 'platinum 5 minutes' concepts that underscore the urgency of timely interventions.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Evidence from the UK-REBOA trial and related studies highlights the complexity of implementing REBOA in prehospital settings, emphasising the importance of early deployment, appropriate patient selection, and minimisation of delays. Technological innovations, including AI-assisted decision-making and automated partial REBOA systems, offer promising avenues for optimising REBOA's application. Furthermore, the concept of damage control prehospital care prioritises essential interventions tailored to individual patient needs, advocating for a streamlined approach to reduce on-scene time.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>The integration of REBOA with advanced prehospital strategies holds the potential for reducing preventable deaths from traumatic haemorrhage, but further research is needed to refine protocols and enhance outcomes in this high-stakes domain.</p>","PeriodicalId":50609,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Anesthesiology","volume":" ","pages":"100-106"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"REBOA for remote damage control resuscitation and the race against time.\",\"authors\":\"Max Marsden, Robert Lendrum, Zane Perkins, Ross A Davenport\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/ACO.0000000000001474\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>The management of noncompressible haemorrhage (NCH) remains a critical challenge in trauma care, with early mortality rates persistently high despite advances in trauma systems. Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta (REBOA) has emerged as a potential intervention to address severe haemorrhage in prehospital and hospital settings. This review examines the role of REBOA in remote damage control resuscitation, focusing on the 'golden hour' and the 'platinum 5 minutes' concepts that underscore the urgency of timely interventions.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Evidence from the UK-REBOA trial and related studies highlights the complexity of implementing REBOA in prehospital settings, emphasising the importance of early deployment, appropriate patient selection, and minimisation of delays. Technological innovations, including AI-assisted decision-making and automated partial REBOA systems, offer promising avenues for optimising REBOA's application. Furthermore, the concept of damage control prehospital care prioritises essential interventions tailored to individual patient needs, advocating for a streamlined approach to reduce on-scene time.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>The integration of REBOA with advanced prehospital strategies holds the potential for reducing preventable deaths from traumatic haemorrhage, but further research is needed to refine protocols and enhance outcomes in this high-stakes domain.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50609,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Opinion in Anesthesiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"100-106\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Opinion in Anesthesiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/ACO.0000000000001474\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/13 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ACO.0000000000001474","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

综述目的:不可压缩性出血(NCH)的处理仍然是创伤护理中的一个关键挑战,尽管创伤系统取得了进步,但早期死亡率仍然很高。复苏血管内球囊阻塞主动脉(REBOA)已成为解决院前和医院设置严重出血的潜在干预措施。本综述探讨了REBOA在远程损伤控制复苏中的作用,重点介绍了强调及时干预紧迫性的“黄金一小时”和“白金5分钟”概念。最近的发现:来自UK-REBOA试验和相关研究的证据强调了在院前环境中实施REBOA的复杂性,强调了早期部署、适当的患者选择和尽量减少延误的重要性。技术创新,包括人工智能辅助决策和自动化部分REBOA系统,为优化REBOA的应用提供了有希望的途径。此外,损害控制院前护理的概念优先考虑针对个别患者需求的基本干预措施,提倡采用简化的方法来减少现场时间。总结:REBOA与先进院前策略的整合具有减少可预防的外伤性出血死亡的潜力,但需要进一步的研究来完善方案并提高这一高风险领域的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
REBOA for remote damage control resuscitation and the race against time.

Purpose of review: The management of noncompressible haemorrhage (NCH) remains a critical challenge in trauma care, with early mortality rates persistently high despite advances in trauma systems. Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta (REBOA) has emerged as a potential intervention to address severe haemorrhage in prehospital and hospital settings. This review examines the role of REBOA in remote damage control resuscitation, focusing on the 'golden hour' and the 'platinum 5 minutes' concepts that underscore the urgency of timely interventions.

Recent findings: Evidence from the UK-REBOA trial and related studies highlights the complexity of implementing REBOA in prehospital settings, emphasising the importance of early deployment, appropriate patient selection, and minimisation of delays. Technological innovations, including AI-assisted decision-making and automated partial REBOA systems, offer promising avenues for optimising REBOA's application. Furthermore, the concept of damage control prehospital care prioritises essential interventions tailored to individual patient needs, advocating for a streamlined approach to reduce on-scene time.

Summary: The integration of REBOA with advanced prehospital strategies holds the potential for reducing preventable deaths from traumatic haemorrhage, but further research is needed to refine protocols and enhance outcomes in this high-stakes domain.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
8.00%
发文量
207
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: ​​​​​​​​Published bimonthly and offering a unique and wide ranging perspective on the key developments in the field, each issue of Current Opinion in Anesthesiology features hand-picked review articles from our team of expert editors. With fifteen disciplines published across the year – including cardiovascular anesthesiology, neuroanesthesia and pain medicine – every issue also contains annotated references detailing the merits of the most important papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信