如果你能抓住我:信号定位与仿冒的e值。

IF 3.1 1区 数学 Q1 STATISTICS & PROBABILITY
Paula Gablenz, Chiara Sabatti
{"title":"如果你能抓住我:信号定位与仿冒的e值。","authors":"Paula Gablenz, Chiara Sabatti","doi":"10.1093/jrsssb/qkae042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We consider problems where many, somewhat redundant, hypotheses are tested and we are interested in reporting the most precise rejections, with false discovery rate (FDR) control. This is the case, for example, when researchers are interested both in individual hypotheses as well as group hypotheses corresponding to intersections of sets of the original hypotheses, at several resolution levels. A concrete application is in genome-wide association studies, where, depending on the signal strengths, it might be possible to resolve the influence of individual genetic variants on a phenotype with greater or lower precision. To adapt to the unknown signal strength, analyses are conducted at multiple resolutions and researchers are most interested in the more precise discoveries. Assuring FDR control on the reported findings with these adaptive searches is, however, often impossible. To design a multiple comparison procedure that allows for an adaptive choice of resolution with FDR control, we leverage <i>e</i>-values and linear programming. We adapt this approach to problems where knockoffs and group knockoffs have been successfully applied to test conditional independence hypotheses. We demonstrate its efficacy by analysing data from the UK Biobank.</p>","PeriodicalId":49982,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B-Statistical Methodology","volume":"87 1","pages":"56-73"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11809227/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Catch me if you can: signal localization with knockoff <i>e</i>-values.\",\"authors\":\"Paula Gablenz, Chiara Sabatti\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jrsssb/qkae042\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>We consider problems where many, somewhat redundant, hypotheses are tested and we are interested in reporting the most precise rejections, with false discovery rate (FDR) control. This is the case, for example, when researchers are interested both in individual hypotheses as well as group hypotheses corresponding to intersections of sets of the original hypotheses, at several resolution levels. A concrete application is in genome-wide association studies, where, depending on the signal strengths, it might be possible to resolve the influence of individual genetic variants on a phenotype with greater or lower precision. To adapt to the unknown signal strength, analyses are conducted at multiple resolutions and researchers are most interested in the more precise discoveries. Assuring FDR control on the reported findings with these adaptive searches is, however, often impossible. To design a multiple comparison procedure that allows for an adaptive choice of resolution with FDR control, we leverage <i>e</i>-values and linear programming. We adapt this approach to problems where knockoffs and group knockoffs have been successfully applied to test conditional independence hypotheses. We demonstrate its efficacy by analysing data from the UK Biobank.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49982,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B-Statistical Methodology\",\"volume\":\"87 1\",\"pages\":\"56-73\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11809227/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B-Statistical Methodology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"100\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jrsssb/qkae042\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"数学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"STATISTICS & PROBABILITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B-Statistical Methodology","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jrsssb/qkae042","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"STATISTICS & PROBABILITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们考虑的问题是,许多有些冗余的假设被测试,我们感兴趣的是报告最精确的拒绝,并控制错误发现率(FDR)。例如,当研究人员既对个体假设感兴趣,也对与原始假设集合的交叉点相对应的群体假设感兴趣时,就会出现这种情况。一个具体的应用是全基因组关联研究,其中,根据信号强度,有可能以更高或更低的精度解决个体遗传变异对表型的影响。为了适应未知的信号强度,在多个分辨率下进行分析,研究人员最感兴趣的是更精确的发现。然而,通过这些适应性搜索来确保罗斯福对报告结果的控制,往往是不可能的。为了设计一个多重比较程序,允许自适应选择具有FDR控制的分辨率,我们利用e值和线性规划。我们采用这种方法来解决仿冒品和群体仿冒品已经成功地应用于测试条件独立假设的问题。我们通过分析英国生物银行的数据来证明其有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Catch me if you can: signal localization with knockoff e-values.

We consider problems where many, somewhat redundant, hypotheses are tested and we are interested in reporting the most precise rejections, with false discovery rate (FDR) control. This is the case, for example, when researchers are interested both in individual hypotheses as well as group hypotheses corresponding to intersections of sets of the original hypotheses, at several resolution levels. A concrete application is in genome-wide association studies, where, depending on the signal strengths, it might be possible to resolve the influence of individual genetic variants on a phenotype with greater or lower precision. To adapt to the unknown signal strength, analyses are conducted at multiple resolutions and researchers are most interested in the more precise discoveries. Assuring FDR control on the reported findings with these adaptive searches is, however, often impossible. To design a multiple comparison procedure that allows for an adaptive choice of resolution with FDR control, we leverage e-values and linear programming. We adapt this approach to problems where knockoffs and group knockoffs have been successfully applied to test conditional independence hypotheses. We demonstrate its efficacy by analysing data from the UK Biobank.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
83
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Series B (Statistical Methodology) aims to publish high quality papers on the methodological aspects of statistics and data science more broadly. The objective of papers should be to contribute to the understanding of statistical methodology and/or to develop and improve statistical methods; any mathematical theory should be directed towards these aims. The kinds of contribution considered include descriptions of new methods of collecting or analysing data, with the underlying theory, an indication of the scope of application and preferably a real example. Also considered are comparisons, critical evaluations and new applications of existing methods, contributions to probability theory which have a clear practical bearing (including the formulation and analysis of stochastic models), statistical computation or simulation where original methodology is involved and original contributions to the foundations of statistical science. Reviews of methodological techniques are also considered. A paper, even if correct and well presented, is likely to be rejected if it only presents straightforward special cases of previously published work, if it is of mathematical interest only, if it is too long in relation to the importance of the new material that it contains or if it is dominated by computations or simulations of a routine nature.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信