免疫检查点抑制剂治疗胸膜间皮瘤:来自现实世界数据的见解。

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Masatoshi Kanayama, Takehiko Manabe, Katsuma Yoshimatsu, Rintaro Oyama, Hiroki Matsumiya, Masataka Mori, Masaru Takenaka, Koji Kuroda, Fumihiro Tanaka
{"title":"免疫检查点抑制剂治疗胸膜间皮瘤:来自现实世界数据的见解。","authors":"Masatoshi Kanayama, Takehiko Manabe, Katsuma Yoshimatsu, Rintaro Oyama, Hiroki Matsumiya, Masataka Mori, Masaru Takenaka, Koji Kuroda, Fumihiro Tanaka","doi":"10.1007/s10147-025-02706-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have recently emerged as a promising strategy for the treatment of pleural mesothelioma (PM).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study evaluated treatment efficacy and safety in Japanese patients with PM treated with nivolumab and ipilimumab (N + I group: 41 patients) as first-line therapy and nivolumab monotherapy (N group: 33 patients) as second- or later-line treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were not reached and 10.4 months in the N + I group, and 8.6 months and 3.5 months in the N group, respectively. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) of any grade occurred in 68.3% of the N + I group and 72.7% of the N group, with grade 3-4 TRAEs in 19.5% and 12.1% of patients, respectively. Patients with an ECOG PS 0-1 had significantly better OS and PFS in both treatment groups (p < 0.001). In the N + I group, OS was significantly better in patients with TRAEs (p = 0.020) and in those with the epithelioid subtype (p = 0.047), although PFS was not significantly different (p = 0.138 and p = 0.154, respectively). In the N group, both OS (p = 0.007) and PFS (p = 0.048) were significantly longer in patients with TRAEs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study provides valuable real-world clinical evidence of the efficacy and safety of nivolumab plus ipilimumab and nivolumab monotherapy in Japanese patients with PM. These results support the use of ICIs as a viable treatment option for advanced or relapsed disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":13869,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"705-717"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Immune checkpoint inhibitors in the treatment of pleural mesothelioma: insights from real-world data.\",\"authors\":\"Masatoshi Kanayama, Takehiko Manabe, Katsuma Yoshimatsu, Rintaro Oyama, Hiroki Matsumiya, Masataka Mori, Masaru Takenaka, Koji Kuroda, Fumihiro Tanaka\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10147-025-02706-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have recently emerged as a promising strategy for the treatment of pleural mesothelioma (PM).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study evaluated treatment efficacy and safety in Japanese patients with PM treated with nivolumab and ipilimumab (N + I group: 41 patients) as first-line therapy and nivolumab monotherapy (N group: 33 patients) as second- or later-line treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were not reached and 10.4 months in the N + I group, and 8.6 months and 3.5 months in the N group, respectively. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) of any grade occurred in 68.3% of the N + I group and 72.7% of the N group, with grade 3-4 TRAEs in 19.5% and 12.1% of patients, respectively. Patients with an ECOG PS 0-1 had significantly better OS and PFS in both treatment groups (p < 0.001). In the N + I group, OS was significantly better in patients with TRAEs (p = 0.020) and in those with the epithelioid subtype (p = 0.047), although PFS was not significantly different (p = 0.138 and p = 0.154, respectively). In the N group, both OS (p = 0.007) and PFS (p = 0.048) were significantly longer in patients with TRAEs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study provides valuable real-world clinical evidence of the efficacy and safety of nivolumab plus ipilimumab and nivolumab monotherapy in Japanese patients with PM. These results support the use of ICIs as a viable treatment option for advanced or relapsed disease.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13869,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Clinical Oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"705-717\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Clinical Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-025-02706-4\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/12 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Clinical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-025-02706-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)最近成为一种治疗胸膜间皮瘤(PM)的有希望的策略。方法:本回顾性研究评估了日本PM患者接受纳武单抗和伊匹单抗(N + I组:41例)作为一线治疗和纳武单抗单药(N组:33例)作为二线或二线治疗的疗效和安全性。结果:N + I组的中位总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期(PFS)分别为10.4个月和8.6个月,N组为3.5个月。治疗相关不良事件(TRAEs)发生率为68.3%的N + I组和72.7%的N组,3-4级TRAEs发生率分别为19.5%和12.1%。ECOG PS为0-1的患者在两个治疗组中均有更好的OS和PFS (p)。结论:本研究为nivolumab联合易普利单抗和nivolumab单药治疗日本PM患者的有效性和安全性提供了有价值的真实世界临床证据。这些结果支持使用ICIs作为晚期或复发疾病的可行治疗选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Immune checkpoint inhibitors in the treatment of pleural mesothelioma: insights from real-world data.

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have recently emerged as a promising strategy for the treatment of pleural mesothelioma (PM).

Methods: This retrospective study evaluated treatment efficacy and safety in Japanese patients with PM treated with nivolumab and ipilimumab (N + I group: 41 patients) as first-line therapy and nivolumab monotherapy (N group: 33 patients) as second- or later-line treatment.

Results: The median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were not reached and 10.4 months in the N + I group, and 8.6 months and 3.5 months in the N group, respectively. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) of any grade occurred in 68.3% of the N + I group and 72.7% of the N group, with grade 3-4 TRAEs in 19.5% and 12.1% of patients, respectively. Patients with an ECOG PS 0-1 had significantly better OS and PFS in both treatment groups (p < 0.001). In the N + I group, OS was significantly better in patients with TRAEs (p = 0.020) and in those with the epithelioid subtype (p = 0.047), although PFS was not significantly different (p = 0.138 and p = 0.154, respectively). In the N group, both OS (p = 0.007) and PFS (p = 0.048) were significantly longer in patients with TRAEs.

Conclusion: This study provides valuable real-world clinical evidence of the efficacy and safety of nivolumab plus ipilimumab and nivolumab monotherapy in Japanese patients with PM. These results support the use of ICIs as a viable treatment option for advanced or relapsed disease.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
3.00%
发文量
175
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Clinical Oncology (IJCO) welcomes original research papers on all aspects of clinical oncology that report the results of novel and timely investigations. Reports on clinical trials are encouraged. Experimental studies will also be accepted if they have obvious relevance to clinical oncology. Membership in the Japan Society of Clinical Oncology is not a prerequisite for submission to the journal. Papers are received on the understanding that: their contents have not been published in whole or in part elsewhere; that they are subject to peer review by at least two referees and the Editors, and to editorial revision of the language and contents; and that the Editors are responsible for their acceptance, rejection, and order of publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信