使用普瑞巴林或米罗巴林相关骨折风险:一项基于日本健康保险索赔数据的病例-病例-时间对照研究

IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Hinako Wakabayashi, Toshiki Fukasawa, Satomi Yoshida, Kairi Ri, Soichiro Masuda, Takayuki Anno, Koji Kawakami
{"title":"使用普瑞巴林或米罗巴林相关骨折风险:一项基于日本健康保险索赔数据的病例-病例-时间对照研究","authors":"Hinako Wakabayashi, Toshiki Fukasawa, Satomi Yoshida, Kairi Ri, Soichiro Masuda, Takayuki Anno, Koji Kawakami","doi":"10.1007/s40264-025-01516-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pregabalin is widely used for neuropathic pain. Mirogabalin, a newer gabapentinoid, was recently introduced in several Asian countries. A previous case-crossover study showed an association between pregabalin and fall-related injuries, but the findings may have been affected by biases from individual- and population-level exposure time trends, and generalizability was limited due to a focus on a middle-aged population. Further, no findings have appeared on mirogabalin and its association with fall-related fractures.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We conducted a case-case-time-control study to investigate the risk of fracture associated with pregabalin and mirogabalin in a population with broad demographic coverage.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Incident fractures were identified from a Japanese claims database. For each case, hazard (days 1-30 before the fracture event) and control windows (days 61-90 before the event) were set. Each current case was matched by age and sex to a future case, defined as a patient who experienced a fracture 120-365 days later. Odds ratios (ORs) were estimated using conditional logistic regression models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 814,216 and 460,811 cases were included in the pregabalin and mirogabalin analyses, respectively. ORs were 1.35 (95% confidence interval 1.28-1.43) for pregabalin and 1.53 (1.35-1.72) for mirogabalin, indicating an increased risk of fracture with both drugs. These results remained consistent and robust across sensitivity and subgroup analyses, except in patients under 65 years of age.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Given this observed risk and the fact that these medications are commonly prescribed to older populations, caution is warranted in clinical use.</p>","PeriodicalId":11382,"journal":{"name":"Drug Safety","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risk of Fracture Associated with Pregabalin or Mirogabalin Use: A Case-Case-Time-Control Study Based on Japanese Health Insurance Claims Data.\",\"authors\":\"Hinako Wakabayashi, Toshiki Fukasawa, Satomi Yoshida, Kairi Ri, Soichiro Masuda, Takayuki Anno, Koji Kawakami\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40264-025-01516-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pregabalin is widely used for neuropathic pain. Mirogabalin, a newer gabapentinoid, was recently introduced in several Asian countries. A previous case-crossover study showed an association between pregabalin and fall-related injuries, but the findings may have been affected by biases from individual- and population-level exposure time trends, and generalizability was limited due to a focus on a middle-aged population. Further, no findings have appeared on mirogabalin and its association with fall-related fractures.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We conducted a case-case-time-control study to investigate the risk of fracture associated with pregabalin and mirogabalin in a population with broad demographic coverage.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Incident fractures were identified from a Japanese claims database. For each case, hazard (days 1-30 before the fracture event) and control windows (days 61-90 before the event) were set. Each current case was matched by age and sex to a future case, defined as a patient who experienced a fracture 120-365 days later. Odds ratios (ORs) were estimated using conditional logistic regression models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 814,216 and 460,811 cases were included in the pregabalin and mirogabalin analyses, respectively. ORs were 1.35 (95% confidence interval 1.28-1.43) for pregabalin and 1.53 (1.35-1.72) for mirogabalin, indicating an increased risk of fracture with both drugs. These results remained consistent and robust across sensitivity and subgroup analyses, except in patients under 65 years of age.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Given this observed risk and the fact that these medications are commonly prescribed to older populations, caution is warranted in clinical use.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11382,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Drug Safety\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Drug Safety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40264-025-01516-x\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40264-025-01516-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:普瑞巴林广泛用于神经性疼痛。米罗巴林是一种较新的加巴喷丁类药物,最近在几个亚洲国家推出。先前的一项病例交叉研究显示普瑞巴林与跌倒相关损伤之间存在关联,但研究结果可能受到个人和人群水平暴露时间趋势的偏差的影响,而且由于关注的是中年人群,因此泛化性受到限制。此外,还没有发现米罗巴林与跌倒相关骨折的关系。目的:我们进行了一项病例-病例-时间-对照研究,以调查普瑞巴林和米洛巴林在人口统计学覆盖范围广泛的人群中的骨折风险。方法:从日本索赔数据库中确定事故骨折。对于每种情况,分别设置危险(骨折事件发生前1-30天)和控制窗口(骨折事件发生前61-90天)。每个当前病例按年龄和性别与未来病例相匹配,定义为120-365天后经历骨折的患者。使用条件逻辑回归模型估计优势比(ORs)。结果:普瑞巴林和米洛巴林分别纳入814,216例和460,811例分析。普瑞巴林的or值为1.35(95%可信区间1.28-1.43),米罗巴林的or值为1.53(95%可信区间1.35-1.72),表明两种药物均增加了骨折的风险。除了65岁以下的患者外,这些结果在敏感性和亚组分析中保持一致和稳健。结论:考虑到观察到的风险和这些药物通常用于老年人群的事实,在临床使用时必须谨慎。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Risk of Fracture Associated with Pregabalin or Mirogabalin Use: A Case-Case-Time-Control Study Based on Japanese Health Insurance Claims Data.

Background: Pregabalin is widely used for neuropathic pain. Mirogabalin, a newer gabapentinoid, was recently introduced in several Asian countries. A previous case-crossover study showed an association between pregabalin and fall-related injuries, but the findings may have been affected by biases from individual- and population-level exposure time trends, and generalizability was limited due to a focus on a middle-aged population. Further, no findings have appeared on mirogabalin and its association with fall-related fractures.

Objective: We conducted a case-case-time-control study to investigate the risk of fracture associated with pregabalin and mirogabalin in a population with broad demographic coverage.

Methods: Incident fractures were identified from a Japanese claims database. For each case, hazard (days 1-30 before the fracture event) and control windows (days 61-90 before the event) were set. Each current case was matched by age and sex to a future case, defined as a patient who experienced a fracture 120-365 days later. Odds ratios (ORs) were estimated using conditional logistic regression models.

Results: A total of 814,216 and 460,811 cases were included in the pregabalin and mirogabalin analyses, respectively. ORs were 1.35 (95% confidence interval 1.28-1.43) for pregabalin and 1.53 (1.35-1.72) for mirogabalin, indicating an increased risk of fracture with both drugs. These results remained consistent and robust across sensitivity and subgroup analyses, except in patients under 65 years of age.

Conclusion: Given this observed risk and the fact that these medications are commonly prescribed to older populations, caution is warranted in clinical use.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Drug Safety
Drug Safety 医学-毒理学
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
7.10%
发文量
112
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Drug Safety is the official journal of the International Society of Pharmacovigilance. The journal includes: Overviews of contentious or emerging issues. Comprehensive narrative reviews that provide an authoritative source of information on epidemiology, clinical features, prevention and management of adverse effects of individual drugs and drug classes. In-depth benefit-risk assessment of adverse effect and efficacy data for a drug in a defined therapeutic area. Systematic reviews (with or without meta-analyses) that collate empirical evidence to answer a specific research question, using explicit, systematic methods as outlined by the PRISMA statement. Original research articles reporting the results of well-designed studies in disciplines such as pharmacoepidemiology, pharmacovigilance, pharmacology and toxicology, and pharmacogenomics. Editorials and commentaries on topical issues. Additional digital features (including animated abstracts, video abstracts, slide decks, audio slides, instructional videos, infographics, podcasts and animations) can be published with articles; these are designed to increase the visibility, readership and educational value of the journal’s content. In addition, articles published in Drug Safety Drugs may be accompanied by plain language summaries to assist readers who have some knowledge of, but not in-depth expertise in, the area to understand important medical advances.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信