可逆符号参照的脑区,人脑的潜在奇异之处。

IF 6.4 1区 生物学 Q1 BIOLOGY
eLife Pub Date : 2025-02-12 DOI:10.7554/eLife.87380
Timo van Kerkoerle, Louise Pape, Milad Ekramnia, Xiaoxia Feng, Jordy Tasserie, Morgan Dupont, Xiaolian Li, Béchir Jarraya, Wim Vanduffel, Stanislas Dehaene, Ghislaine Dehaene-Lambertz
{"title":"可逆符号参照的脑区,人脑的潜在奇异之处。","authors":"Timo van Kerkoerle, Louise Pape, Milad Ekramnia, Xiaoxia Feng, Jordy Tasserie, Morgan Dupont, Xiaolian Li, Béchir Jarraya, Wim Vanduffel, Stanislas Dehaene, Ghislaine Dehaene-Lambertz","doi":"10.7554/eLife.87380","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The emergence of symbolic thinking has been proposed as a dominant cognitive criterion to distinguish humans from other primates during hominisation. Although the proper definition of a symbol has been the subject of much debate, one of its simplest features is bidirectional attachment: the content is accessible from the symbol, and vice versa. Behavioural observations scattered over the past four decades suggest that this criterion might not be met in non-human primates, as they fail to generalise an association learned in one temporal order (A to B) to the reverse order (B to A). Here, we designed an implicit fMRI test to investigate the neural mechanisms of arbitrary audio-visual and visual-visual pairing in monkeys and humans and probe their spontaneous reversibility. After learning a unidirectional association, humans showed surprise signals when this learned association was violated. Crucially, this effect occurred spontaneously in both learned and reversed directions, within an extended network of high-level brain areas, including, but also going beyond, the language network. In monkeys, by contrast, violations of association effects occurred solely in the learned direction and were largely confined to sensory areas. We propose that a human-specific brain network may have evolved the capacity for reversible symbolic reference.</p>","PeriodicalId":11640,"journal":{"name":"eLife","volume":"12 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11820117/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Brain areas for reversible symbolic reference, a potential singularity of the human brain.\",\"authors\":\"Timo van Kerkoerle, Louise Pape, Milad Ekramnia, Xiaoxia Feng, Jordy Tasserie, Morgan Dupont, Xiaolian Li, Béchir Jarraya, Wim Vanduffel, Stanislas Dehaene, Ghislaine Dehaene-Lambertz\",\"doi\":\"10.7554/eLife.87380\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The emergence of symbolic thinking has been proposed as a dominant cognitive criterion to distinguish humans from other primates during hominisation. Although the proper definition of a symbol has been the subject of much debate, one of its simplest features is bidirectional attachment: the content is accessible from the symbol, and vice versa. Behavioural observations scattered over the past four decades suggest that this criterion might not be met in non-human primates, as they fail to generalise an association learned in one temporal order (A to B) to the reverse order (B to A). Here, we designed an implicit fMRI test to investigate the neural mechanisms of arbitrary audio-visual and visual-visual pairing in monkeys and humans and probe their spontaneous reversibility. After learning a unidirectional association, humans showed surprise signals when this learned association was violated. Crucially, this effect occurred spontaneously in both learned and reversed directions, within an extended network of high-level brain areas, including, but also going beyond, the language network. In monkeys, by contrast, violations of association effects occurred solely in the learned direction and were largely confined to sensory areas. We propose that a human-specific brain network may have evolved the capacity for reversible symbolic reference.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11640,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"eLife\",\"volume\":\"12 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11820117/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"eLife\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.87380\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"eLife","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.87380","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

符号思维的出现被认为是区分人类与其他灵长类动物的主要认知标准。尽管符号的正确定义一直是很多争论的主题,但其最简单的特征之一是双向依恋:内容可以从符号访问,反之亦然。过去四十年的行为观察表明,非人类灵长类动物可能不符合这一标准,因为它们无法将在一个时间顺序(A到B)中习得的关联推广到相反的时间顺序(B到A)。在这里,我们设计了一个隐式fMRI测试来研究猴子和人类任意视听和视觉-视觉配对的神经机制,并探索它们的自发可逆性。在学习了单向关联之后,当这种习得的关联被破坏时,人类会表现出惊讶的信号。至关重要的是,这种效应自发地发生在学习方向和反向方向上,在大脑高级区域的扩展网络中,包括(但也不止于此)语言网络。相比之下,在猴子身上,违反联想效应只发生在学习方向上,而且主要局限于感觉区域。我们提出,人类特定的大脑网络可能已经进化出可逆符号参考的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Brain areas for reversible symbolic reference, a potential singularity of the human brain.

The emergence of symbolic thinking has been proposed as a dominant cognitive criterion to distinguish humans from other primates during hominisation. Although the proper definition of a symbol has been the subject of much debate, one of its simplest features is bidirectional attachment: the content is accessible from the symbol, and vice versa. Behavioural observations scattered over the past four decades suggest that this criterion might not be met in non-human primates, as they fail to generalise an association learned in one temporal order (A to B) to the reverse order (B to A). Here, we designed an implicit fMRI test to investigate the neural mechanisms of arbitrary audio-visual and visual-visual pairing in monkeys and humans and probe their spontaneous reversibility. After learning a unidirectional association, humans showed surprise signals when this learned association was violated. Crucially, this effect occurred spontaneously in both learned and reversed directions, within an extended network of high-level brain areas, including, but also going beyond, the language network. In monkeys, by contrast, violations of association effects occurred solely in the learned direction and were largely confined to sensory areas. We propose that a human-specific brain network may have evolved the capacity for reversible symbolic reference.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
eLife
eLife BIOLOGY-
CiteScore
12.90
自引率
3.90%
发文量
3122
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊介绍: eLife is a distinguished, not-for-profit, peer-reviewed open access scientific journal that specializes in the fields of biomedical and life sciences. eLife is known for its selective publication process, which includes a variety of article types such as: Research Articles: Detailed reports of original research findings. Short Reports: Concise presentations of significant findings that do not warrant a full-length research article. Tools and Resources: Descriptions of new tools, technologies, or resources that facilitate scientific research. Research Advances: Brief reports on significant scientific advancements that have immediate implications for the field. Scientific Correspondence: Short communications that comment on or provide additional information related to published articles. Review Articles: Comprehensive overviews of a specific topic or field within the life sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信