Wiebke Semper-Hogg, Alexander Rau, Marc Anton Fuessinger, Sabrina Zimmermann, Fabian Bamberg, Marc Christian Metzger, Rainer Schmelzeisen, Stephan Rau, Marco Reisert, Maximilian Frederik Russe
{"title":"基于深度学习的锥形束计算机断层下颌管分割达到了人类水平的性能。","authors":"Wiebke Semper-Hogg, Alexander Rau, Marc Anton Fuessinger, Sabrina Zimmermann, Fabian Bamberg, Marc Christian Metzger, Rainer Schmelzeisen, Stephan Rau, Marco Reisert, Maximilian Frederik Russe","doi":"10.1093/dmfr/twae069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study evaluated the accuracy and reliability of deep learning-based segmentation techniques for mandibular canal identification in cone-beam CT (CBCT) data to provide a reliable and efficient support tool for dental implant treatment planning.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A dataset of 90 CBCT scans was annotated as ground truth for mandibular canal segmentation. The dataset was split into training (n = 69), validation (n = 1), and testing (n = 20) subsets. A deep learning model based on a hierarchical convolutional neural network architecture was developed and trained. The model's performance was evaluated using dice similarity coefficient (DSC), 95% Hausdorff distance (HD), and average symmetric surface distance (ASSD). Qualitative assessment was performed by 2 experienced dental imaging practitioners who evaluated the segmentation quality in terms of trust and safety on a 5-point Likert scale at 3 mandibular locations per side.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The trained model achieved a mean DSC of 0.77 ± 0.09, HD of 1.66 ± 0.86 mm, and ASSD of 0.31 ± 0.15 mm on the testing subset. Qualitative assessment showed no significant difference between the deep learning-based segmentation and ground truth in terms of trust and safety across all investigated locations (P > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The proposed deep learning-based segmentation technique exhibits sufficient accuracy for the reliable identification of mandibular canals in CBCT scans. This automated approach could streamline the pre-operative planning process for dental implant placement, reducing the risk of neurovascular complications and enhancing patient safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":11261,"journal":{"name":"Dento maxillo facial radiology","volume":" ","pages":"279-285"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Deep learning-based segmentation of the mandibular canals in cone-beam CT reaches human-level performance.\",\"authors\":\"Wiebke Semper-Hogg, Alexander Rau, Marc Anton Fuessinger, Sabrina Zimmermann, Fabian Bamberg, Marc Christian Metzger, Rainer Schmelzeisen, Stephan Rau, Marco Reisert, Maximilian Frederik Russe\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/dmfr/twae069\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study evaluated the accuracy and reliability of deep learning-based segmentation techniques for mandibular canal identification in cone-beam CT (CBCT) data to provide a reliable and efficient support tool for dental implant treatment planning.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A dataset of 90 CBCT scans was annotated as ground truth for mandibular canal segmentation. The dataset was split into training (n = 69), validation (n = 1), and testing (n = 20) subsets. A deep learning model based on a hierarchical convolutional neural network architecture was developed and trained. The model's performance was evaluated using dice similarity coefficient (DSC), 95% Hausdorff distance (HD), and average symmetric surface distance (ASSD). Qualitative assessment was performed by 2 experienced dental imaging practitioners who evaluated the segmentation quality in terms of trust and safety on a 5-point Likert scale at 3 mandibular locations per side.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The trained model achieved a mean DSC of 0.77 ± 0.09, HD of 1.66 ± 0.86 mm, and ASSD of 0.31 ± 0.15 mm on the testing subset. Qualitative assessment showed no significant difference between the deep learning-based segmentation and ground truth in terms of trust and safety across all investigated locations (P > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The proposed deep learning-based segmentation technique exhibits sufficient accuracy for the reliable identification of mandibular canals in CBCT scans. This automated approach could streamline the pre-operative planning process for dental implant placement, reducing the risk of neurovascular complications and enhancing patient safety.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11261,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dento maxillo facial radiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"279-285\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dento maxillo facial radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/dmfr/twae069\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dento maxillo facial radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/dmfr/twae069","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Deep learning-based segmentation of the mandibular canals in cone-beam CT reaches human-level performance.
Objectives: This study evaluated the accuracy and reliability of deep learning-based segmentation techniques for mandibular canal identification in cone-beam CT (CBCT) data to provide a reliable and efficient support tool for dental implant treatment planning.
Methods: A dataset of 90 CBCT scans was annotated as ground truth for mandibular canal segmentation. The dataset was split into training (n = 69), validation (n = 1), and testing (n = 20) subsets. A deep learning model based on a hierarchical convolutional neural network architecture was developed and trained. The model's performance was evaluated using dice similarity coefficient (DSC), 95% Hausdorff distance (HD), and average symmetric surface distance (ASSD). Qualitative assessment was performed by 2 experienced dental imaging practitioners who evaluated the segmentation quality in terms of trust and safety on a 5-point Likert scale at 3 mandibular locations per side.
Results: The trained model achieved a mean DSC of 0.77 ± 0.09, HD of 1.66 ± 0.86 mm, and ASSD of 0.31 ± 0.15 mm on the testing subset. Qualitative assessment showed no significant difference between the deep learning-based segmentation and ground truth in terms of trust and safety across all investigated locations (P > 0.05).
Conclusions: The proposed deep learning-based segmentation technique exhibits sufficient accuracy for the reliable identification of mandibular canals in CBCT scans. This automated approach could streamline the pre-operative planning process for dental implant placement, reducing the risk of neurovascular complications and enhancing patient safety.
期刊介绍:
Dentomaxillofacial Radiology (DMFR) is the journal of the International Association of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology (IADMFR) and covers the closely related fields of oral radiology and head and neck imaging.
Established in 1972, DMFR is a key resource keeping dentists, radiologists and clinicians and scientists with an interest in Head and Neck imaging abreast of important research and developments in oral and maxillofacial radiology.
The DMFR editorial board features a panel of international experts including Editor-in-Chief Professor Ralf Schulze. Our editorial board provide their expertise and guidance in shaping the content and direction of the journal.
Quick Facts:
- 2015 Impact Factor - 1.919
- Receipt to first decision - average of 3 weeks
- Acceptance to online publication - average of 3 weeks
- Open access option
- ISSN: 0250-832X
- eISSN: 1476-542X