在心导管实验室引入麻醉监护对临床回顾、快速反应、蓝码率和死亡率的影响。

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Sophie A Meyerson, Ben Olesnicky, Gene Lee, Andrea S Santoro, Ravinay Bhindi
{"title":"在心导管实验室引入麻醉监护对临床回顾、快速反应、蓝码率和死亡率的影响。","authors":"Sophie A Meyerson, Ben Olesnicky, Gene Lee, Andrea S Santoro, Ravinay Bhindi","doi":"10.1177/0310057X241304423","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Most procedures in cardiac catheterisation laboratories (CCLs) have traditionally been performed under conscious sedation under the supervision of the treating proceduralist. With growing demand for more complex procedures to be performed, in emergencies and in patients with limited cardiorespiratory reserve, a reconsideration of the level of supervision provided is required. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of all patients who had CCL procedures and required an overnight stay at Royal North Shore Hospital during a 12-month period prior to introducing monitored anaesthesia care (MAC), compared with a 12-month period following introduction of MAC on selected weekdays. Primary outcomes were the difference in rates of Code Blue calls (triggering the cardiac arrest team), Clinical Reviews and Rapid Responses (defined as per the NSW Health 'Between the Flags' Deteriorating Patient Safety Net System) in the 24 h post-procedure between patients who did and did not have MAC. The secondary outcome was a difference in mortality (within 24 h of a procedure and in-hospital) between patients who did and did not have MAC. One thousand nine hundred and eight patients were analysed (926 pre-intervention, 982 post-intervention). We found no statistically significant difference in any of the primary or secondary outcomes between the pre-intervention and post-intervention patients overall. However, we found a statistically significant lower rate of Code Blue calls in patients who had MAC (<i>n</i> = 3, 0.6%) compared with no MAC (<i>n</i> = 31, 2.3%). We also found a significantly lower 24-h mortality in patients who had MAC (<i>n</i> = 1, 0.2%) compared with no MAC (<i>n</i> = 22, 1.6%), but no difference in overall in-hospital mortality.</p>","PeriodicalId":7746,"journal":{"name":"Anaesthesia and Intensive Care","volume":" ","pages":"310057X241304423"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The impact of the introduction of monitored anaesthesia care in the cardiac catheterisation laboratory on Clinical Review, Rapid Response, and Blue Code rates, and mortality.\",\"authors\":\"Sophie A Meyerson, Ben Olesnicky, Gene Lee, Andrea S Santoro, Ravinay Bhindi\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/0310057X241304423\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Most procedures in cardiac catheterisation laboratories (CCLs) have traditionally been performed under conscious sedation under the supervision of the treating proceduralist. With growing demand for more complex procedures to be performed, in emergencies and in patients with limited cardiorespiratory reserve, a reconsideration of the level of supervision provided is required. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of all patients who had CCL procedures and required an overnight stay at Royal North Shore Hospital during a 12-month period prior to introducing monitored anaesthesia care (MAC), compared with a 12-month period following introduction of MAC on selected weekdays. Primary outcomes were the difference in rates of Code Blue calls (triggering the cardiac arrest team), Clinical Reviews and Rapid Responses (defined as per the NSW Health 'Between the Flags' Deteriorating Patient Safety Net System) in the 24 h post-procedure between patients who did and did not have MAC. The secondary outcome was a difference in mortality (within 24 h of a procedure and in-hospital) between patients who did and did not have MAC. One thousand nine hundred and eight patients were analysed (926 pre-intervention, 982 post-intervention). We found no statistically significant difference in any of the primary or secondary outcomes between the pre-intervention and post-intervention patients overall. However, we found a statistically significant lower rate of Code Blue calls in patients who had MAC (<i>n</i> = 3, 0.6%) compared with no MAC (<i>n</i> = 31, 2.3%). We also found a significantly lower 24-h mortality in patients who had MAC (<i>n</i> = 1, 0.2%) compared with no MAC (<i>n</i> = 22, 1.6%), but no difference in overall in-hospital mortality.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7746,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anaesthesia and Intensive Care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"310057X241304423\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anaesthesia and Intensive Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/0310057X241304423\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anaesthesia and Intensive Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0310057X241304423","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

传统上,心导管实验室(ccl)的大多数程序都是在治疗程序医师的监督下,在清醒镇静下进行的。在紧急情况和心肺储备有限的患者中,随着对更复杂手术的需求不断增加,需要重新考虑所提供的监督水平。我们对所有接受CCL手术并在引入麻醉监护(MAC)前12个月内需要在皇家北岸医院过夜的患者进行了回顾性队列研究,并与在选定的工作日引入麻醉监护后的12个月期间进行了比较。主要结果是蓝色警报呼叫(触发心脏骤停小组)的比率的差异,临床评价和快速反应(根据新南威尔士州健康“旗帜之间”恶化的患者安全网系统定义)在有和没有MAC的患者手术后24小时内进行。次要结果是有和没有MAC的患者之间的死亡率差异(手术后24小时内和住院)。分析了1,9008名患者(926名干预前,982名干预后)。我们发现干预前和干预后患者总体上的主要或次要结局没有统计学上的显著差异。然而,我们发现,与没有MAC的患者(n = 31,2.3%)相比,患有MAC的患者(n = 3,0.6%)的蓝色警报呼叫率具有统计学意义。我们还发现,MAC患者的24小时死亡率(n = 1,0.2%)显著低于无MAC患者(n = 22,1.6%),但总体住院死亡率无差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The impact of the introduction of monitored anaesthesia care in the cardiac catheterisation laboratory on Clinical Review, Rapid Response, and Blue Code rates, and mortality.

Most procedures in cardiac catheterisation laboratories (CCLs) have traditionally been performed under conscious sedation under the supervision of the treating proceduralist. With growing demand for more complex procedures to be performed, in emergencies and in patients with limited cardiorespiratory reserve, a reconsideration of the level of supervision provided is required. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of all patients who had CCL procedures and required an overnight stay at Royal North Shore Hospital during a 12-month period prior to introducing monitored anaesthesia care (MAC), compared with a 12-month period following introduction of MAC on selected weekdays. Primary outcomes were the difference in rates of Code Blue calls (triggering the cardiac arrest team), Clinical Reviews and Rapid Responses (defined as per the NSW Health 'Between the Flags' Deteriorating Patient Safety Net System) in the 24 h post-procedure between patients who did and did not have MAC. The secondary outcome was a difference in mortality (within 24 h of a procedure and in-hospital) between patients who did and did not have MAC. One thousand nine hundred and eight patients were analysed (926 pre-intervention, 982 post-intervention). We found no statistically significant difference in any of the primary or secondary outcomes between the pre-intervention and post-intervention patients overall. However, we found a statistically significant lower rate of Code Blue calls in patients who had MAC (n = 3, 0.6%) compared with no MAC (n = 31, 2.3%). We also found a significantly lower 24-h mortality in patients who had MAC (n = 1, 0.2%) compared with no MAC (n = 22, 1.6%), but no difference in overall in-hospital mortality.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
13.30%
发文量
150
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Anaesthesia and Intensive Care is an international journal publishing timely, peer reviewed articles that have educational value and scientific merit for clinicians and researchers associated with anaesthesia, intensive care medicine, and pain medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信