C. Cattaneo, M. Bernardi, N. Fracchiolla, C. Pagani, F. Gigli, C. Basilico, L. Masina, E. Borlenghi, A. Bruno, G. Gela, G. Rossi, A. Tucci, D. Bertoli, F. Lussana, E. Todisco
{"title":"急性淋巴细胞白血病与急性髓性白血病侵袭性肺曲霉病的流行病学不同:伦巴第病理学网前瞻性多中心观察研究的结果","authors":"C. Cattaneo, M. Bernardi, N. Fracchiolla, C. Pagani, F. Gigli, C. Basilico, L. Masina, E. Borlenghi, A. Bruno, G. Gela, G. Rossi, A. Tucci, D. Bertoli, F. Lussana, E. Todisco","doi":"10.1002/hon.70045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>The negative impact of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA) in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is well known whereas its clinical relevance in acute lymphoid leukemia (ALL) is still unclear. We have carried out a prospective multicentric observational study within the Rete Ematologica Lombarda to describe the incidence of IPA in acute leukemia (AL) patients, focusing on differences between AML and ALL. Between 2018 and 2020, 207 AL patients (AML: 165, ALL: 42) were evaluated. During induction, proven/probable and possible IPA were diagnosed in 32/207 patients (15.4%), equally divided into proven/probable and possible (16 each, 7.7%). IPA diagnosis was made in 23/165 (13.9%) AML and in 9/42 (21.4%) ALL patients (<i>p</i> = 0.2374). Proven/probable IPA were more frequent in ALL than in AML (ALL: 7/42, 16.6% vs. AML: 9/165, 5.4%; <i>p</i> = 0.0235). OS was similar in patients with or without proven/probable IPA (not reached vs. 63 months, <i>p</i> = 0.588), while OS was significantly reduced in possible IPA (22 months vs. not reached, <i>p</i> = 0.0167). More than 15 days of neutropenia duration and lack of antimold prophylaxis were associated with IPA. Achieving complete remission was protective, whereas age over 60 years and, with a borderline significance, possible IPA were associated with risk of death. In conclusion, Ph-negative ALL should be considered at the same high risk for IPA as AML. Antimold prophylaxis should be probably extended also to ALL.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":12882,"journal":{"name":"Hematological Oncology","volume":"43 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Different Epidemiology of Invasive Pulmonary Aspergillosis in Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Comparison With Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Results of a Prospective Multicentric Observational Study of the Rete Ematologica Lombarda\",\"authors\":\"C. Cattaneo, M. Bernardi, N. Fracchiolla, C. Pagani, F. Gigli, C. Basilico, L. Masina, E. Borlenghi, A. Bruno, G. Gela, G. Rossi, A. Tucci, D. Bertoli, F. Lussana, E. Todisco\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/hon.70045\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>The negative impact of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA) in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is well known whereas its clinical relevance in acute lymphoid leukemia (ALL) is still unclear. We have carried out a prospective multicentric observational study within the Rete Ematologica Lombarda to describe the incidence of IPA in acute leukemia (AL) patients, focusing on differences between AML and ALL. Between 2018 and 2020, 207 AL patients (AML: 165, ALL: 42) were evaluated. During induction, proven/probable and possible IPA were diagnosed in 32/207 patients (15.4%), equally divided into proven/probable and possible (16 each, 7.7%). IPA diagnosis was made in 23/165 (13.9%) AML and in 9/42 (21.4%) ALL patients (<i>p</i> = 0.2374). Proven/probable IPA were more frequent in ALL than in AML (ALL: 7/42, 16.6% vs. AML: 9/165, 5.4%; <i>p</i> = 0.0235). OS was similar in patients with or without proven/probable IPA (not reached vs. 63 months, <i>p</i> = 0.588), while OS was significantly reduced in possible IPA (22 months vs. not reached, <i>p</i> = 0.0167). More than 15 days of neutropenia duration and lack of antimold prophylaxis were associated with IPA. Achieving complete remission was protective, whereas age over 60 years and, with a borderline significance, possible IPA were associated with risk of death. In conclusion, Ph-negative ALL should be considered at the same high risk for IPA as AML. Antimold prophylaxis should be probably extended also to ALL.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12882,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hematological Oncology\",\"volume\":\"43 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hematological Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hon.70045\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hematological Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hon.70045","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Different Epidemiology of Invasive Pulmonary Aspergillosis in Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Comparison With Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Results of a Prospective Multicentric Observational Study of the Rete Ematologica Lombarda
The negative impact of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA) in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is well known whereas its clinical relevance in acute lymphoid leukemia (ALL) is still unclear. We have carried out a prospective multicentric observational study within the Rete Ematologica Lombarda to describe the incidence of IPA in acute leukemia (AL) patients, focusing on differences between AML and ALL. Between 2018 and 2020, 207 AL patients (AML: 165, ALL: 42) were evaluated. During induction, proven/probable and possible IPA were diagnosed in 32/207 patients (15.4%), equally divided into proven/probable and possible (16 each, 7.7%). IPA diagnosis was made in 23/165 (13.9%) AML and in 9/42 (21.4%) ALL patients (p = 0.2374). Proven/probable IPA were more frequent in ALL than in AML (ALL: 7/42, 16.6% vs. AML: 9/165, 5.4%; p = 0.0235). OS was similar in patients with or without proven/probable IPA (not reached vs. 63 months, p = 0.588), while OS was significantly reduced in possible IPA (22 months vs. not reached, p = 0.0167). More than 15 days of neutropenia duration and lack of antimold prophylaxis were associated with IPA. Achieving complete remission was protective, whereas age over 60 years and, with a borderline significance, possible IPA were associated with risk of death. In conclusion, Ph-negative ALL should be considered at the same high risk for IPA as AML. Antimold prophylaxis should be probably extended also to ALL.
期刊介绍:
Hematological Oncology considers for publication articles dealing with experimental and clinical aspects of neoplastic diseases of the hemopoietic and lymphoid systems and relevant related matters. Translational studies applying basic science to clinical issues are particularly welcomed. Manuscripts dealing with the following areas are encouraged:
-Clinical practice and management of hematological neoplasia, including: acute and chronic leukemias, malignant lymphomas, myeloproliferative disorders
-Diagnostic investigations, including imaging and laboratory assays
-Epidemiology, pathology and pathobiology of hematological neoplasia of hematological diseases
-Therapeutic issues including Phase 1, 2 or 3 trials as well as allogeneic and autologous stem cell transplantation studies
-Aspects of the cell biology, molecular biology, molecular genetics and cytogenetics of normal or diseased hematopoeisis and lymphopoiesis, including stem cells and cytokines and other regulatory systems.
Concise, topical review material is welcomed, especially if it makes new concepts and ideas accessible to a wider community. Proposals for review material may be discussed with the Editor-in-Chief. Collections of case material and case reports will be considered only if they have broader scientific or clinical relevance.