优化eDNA元条形码技术评估树相关微生境节肢动物群落

Q1 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Mohammad Jamil Shuvo, Tasmina Tabassum, Gernot Segelbacher
{"title":"优化eDNA元条形码技术评估树相关微生境节肢动物群落","authors":"Mohammad Jamil Shuvo,&nbsp;Tasmina Tabassum,&nbsp;Gernot Segelbacher","doi":"10.1002/edn3.70064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Understanding the diversity and ecological roles of arthropods within tree-related microhabitats (TreMs) is crucial for forest ecosystem conservation and management. In our study, we aimed to identify the most effective environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding approach for capturing ecologically important arthropod species primarily inhabiting the near-ground-level TreMs. We evaluated the use of COI and 16S primers for eDNA metabarcoding and compared direct and indirect eDNA sampling methods, including lying deadwood sediment sampling (LDS), standing deadwood sediment sampling (SDS), soil sampling (SS), and tree surface roller sampling (TSRS). Our results indicated significant biases and challenges, particularly in primer selection, with COI outperforming 16S in taxonomic resolution for most arthropod taxa. Our TSRS method effectively captured 408 OTUs at the species level, with the highest number of ecologically significant arthropods associated with TreMs compared to other approaches. Direct sampling from sediments revealed a higher abundance of fungi than arthropods, impacting diversity estimates. We also observed habitat-specific preferences among arthropods, with certain sampling methods capturing distinct taxa. Our findings underscore the importance of carefully selecting sampling methods and validating primers in eDNA metabarcoding studies and provide insights into the complexity of arthropod communities in TreMs. Optimized methods will advance monitoring techniques for forest ecosystems and inform conservation efforts to preserve arthropod diversity in TreMs.</p>","PeriodicalId":52828,"journal":{"name":"Environmental DNA","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/edn3.70064","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimizing eDNA Metabarcoding Techniques for Assessing Arthropod Communities in Tree-Related Microhabitats\",\"authors\":\"Mohammad Jamil Shuvo,&nbsp;Tasmina Tabassum,&nbsp;Gernot Segelbacher\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/edn3.70064\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Understanding the diversity and ecological roles of arthropods within tree-related microhabitats (TreMs) is crucial for forest ecosystem conservation and management. In our study, we aimed to identify the most effective environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding approach for capturing ecologically important arthropod species primarily inhabiting the near-ground-level TreMs. We evaluated the use of COI and 16S primers for eDNA metabarcoding and compared direct and indirect eDNA sampling methods, including lying deadwood sediment sampling (LDS), standing deadwood sediment sampling (SDS), soil sampling (SS), and tree surface roller sampling (TSRS). Our results indicated significant biases and challenges, particularly in primer selection, with COI outperforming 16S in taxonomic resolution for most arthropod taxa. Our TSRS method effectively captured 408 OTUs at the species level, with the highest number of ecologically significant arthropods associated with TreMs compared to other approaches. Direct sampling from sediments revealed a higher abundance of fungi than arthropods, impacting diversity estimates. We also observed habitat-specific preferences among arthropods, with certain sampling methods capturing distinct taxa. Our findings underscore the importance of carefully selecting sampling methods and validating primers in eDNA metabarcoding studies and provide insights into the complexity of arthropod communities in TreMs. Optimized methods will advance monitoring techniques for forest ecosystems and inform conservation efforts to preserve arthropod diversity in TreMs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":52828,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental DNA\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/edn3.70064\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental DNA\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/edn3.70064\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Agricultural and Biological Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental DNA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/edn3.70064","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

了解树相关微生境中节肢动物的多样性及其生态作用对森林生态系统的保护和管理具有重要意义。在我们的研究中,我们旨在确定最有效的环境DNA (eDNA)元条形码方法,以捕获主要居住在近地面trem的生态重要节肢动物物种。我们评估了COI和16S引物对eDNA元条形码的使用,并比较了直接和间接的eDNA采样方法,包括躺腐木沉积物采样(LDS)、立腐木沉积物采样(SDS)、土壤采样(SS)和树表面滚轮采样(TSRS)。我们的研究结果显示了显著的偏差和挑战,特别是在引物选择方面,COI在大多数节肢动物类群的分类分辨率上优于16S。我们的TSRS方法在物种水平上有效捕获了408个otu,与其他方法相比,与trem相关的生态重要节肢动物数量最多。从沉积物中直接取样显示,真菌的丰度高于节肢动物,影响了多样性的估计。我们还观察到节肢动物的栖息地偏好,采用特定的采样方法捕获不同的类群。我们的研究结果强调了在eDNA元条形码研究中仔细选择采样方法和验证引物的重要性,并提供了对trem中节肢动物群落复杂性的见解。优化的方法将促进森林生态系统的监测技术,并为保护trem节肢动物多样性提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Optimizing eDNA Metabarcoding Techniques for Assessing Arthropod Communities in Tree-Related Microhabitats

Optimizing eDNA Metabarcoding Techniques for Assessing Arthropod Communities in Tree-Related Microhabitats

Understanding the diversity and ecological roles of arthropods within tree-related microhabitats (TreMs) is crucial for forest ecosystem conservation and management. In our study, we aimed to identify the most effective environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding approach for capturing ecologically important arthropod species primarily inhabiting the near-ground-level TreMs. We evaluated the use of COI and 16S primers for eDNA metabarcoding and compared direct and indirect eDNA sampling methods, including lying deadwood sediment sampling (LDS), standing deadwood sediment sampling (SDS), soil sampling (SS), and tree surface roller sampling (TSRS). Our results indicated significant biases and challenges, particularly in primer selection, with COI outperforming 16S in taxonomic resolution for most arthropod taxa. Our TSRS method effectively captured 408 OTUs at the species level, with the highest number of ecologically significant arthropods associated with TreMs compared to other approaches. Direct sampling from sediments revealed a higher abundance of fungi than arthropods, impacting diversity estimates. We also observed habitat-specific preferences among arthropods, with certain sampling methods capturing distinct taxa. Our findings underscore the importance of carefully selecting sampling methods and validating primers in eDNA metabarcoding studies and provide insights into the complexity of arthropod communities in TreMs. Optimized methods will advance monitoring techniques for forest ecosystems and inform conservation efforts to preserve arthropod diversity in TreMs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental DNA
Environmental DNA Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
99
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信