16项个人主义与集体主义文化取向量表的析因效度与信度

IF 2.4 2区 社会学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
Betul Keles-Gordesli , Mary Leamy , Trevor Murrells , Annmarie Grealish
{"title":"16项个人主义与集体主义文化取向量表的析因效度与信度","authors":"Betul Keles-Gordesli ,&nbsp;Mary Leamy ,&nbsp;Trevor Murrells ,&nbsp;Annmarie Grealish","doi":"10.1016/j.ijintrel.2025.102153","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study aimed to investigate the factor structure of the 16-item individualism and collectivism scale and assess its validity and reliability. The sample consisted of 299 secondary school students aged 14–16 from Turkey (N = 176), Ireland (N = 70), and England (N = 53). The total sample was divided into halves, Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was performed on the first half (N = 150) and the confirmatory factor analysis on the remaining sample (N = 149). Cognitive interviews were conducted with seven adolescents from Turkey and England to provide further evidence of validity. The mean age was 15.21 years (range 14–16 years). EFA generated a four-factor model in which all items except one loaded on the expected factors whereas the one item (labeled as VC4) that was expected to load on the factor representing ‘vertical collectivism’ loaded higher on the factor representing ‘horizontal collectivism’. Cognitive interview results supported the EFA results. After omitting the problematic item, fit indices showed a better fit to the data and the scale had good and acceptable reliability. A previously identified model, in which VC4 was assigned to the HC factor and HC3 and HI4 were excluded from the analysis, demonstrated a slightly better fit for the majority of fit indices. For valid and reliable results, the 16-item individualism and collectivism scale needs to be further developed by clarifying vague or ambiguous terms. Future research should also replicate this study with a larger sample and in different settings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48216,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Intercultural Relations","volume":"105 ","pages":"Article 102153"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Factorial validity and reliability of the 16-item individualism and collectivism scale for measuring cultural orientation\",\"authors\":\"Betul Keles-Gordesli ,&nbsp;Mary Leamy ,&nbsp;Trevor Murrells ,&nbsp;Annmarie Grealish\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijintrel.2025.102153\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study aimed to investigate the factor structure of the 16-item individualism and collectivism scale and assess its validity and reliability. The sample consisted of 299 secondary school students aged 14–16 from Turkey (N = 176), Ireland (N = 70), and England (N = 53). The total sample was divided into halves, Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was performed on the first half (N = 150) and the confirmatory factor analysis on the remaining sample (N = 149). Cognitive interviews were conducted with seven adolescents from Turkey and England to provide further evidence of validity. The mean age was 15.21 years (range 14–16 years). EFA generated a four-factor model in which all items except one loaded on the expected factors whereas the one item (labeled as VC4) that was expected to load on the factor representing ‘vertical collectivism’ loaded higher on the factor representing ‘horizontal collectivism’. Cognitive interview results supported the EFA results. After omitting the problematic item, fit indices showed a better fit to the data and the scale had good and acceptable reliability. A previously identified model, in which VC4 was assigned to the HC factor and HC3 and HI4 were excluded from the analysis, demonstrated a slightly better fit for the majority of fit indices. For valid and reliable results, the 16-item individualism and collectivism scale needs to be further developed by clarifying vague or ambiguous terms. Future research should also replicate this study with a larger sample and in different settings.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48216,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Intercultural Relations\",\"volume\":\"105 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102153\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Intercultural Relations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0147176725000161\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Intercultural Relations","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0147176725000161","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在探讨16项个人主义与集体主义量表的因素结构,并评估其效度和信度。样本包括来自土耳其(N = 176)、爱尔兰(N = 70)和英国(N = 53)的299名14-16岁中学生。将总样本分成两半,对前半份样本(N = 150)进行探索性因子分析(EFA),对剩余样本(N = 149)进行验证性因子分析。对来自土耳其和英国的7名青少年进行了认知访谈,以提供进一步的有效性证据。平均年龄15.21岁(14 ~ 16岁)。EFA生成了一个四因素模型,在这个模型中,除了一个项目外,所有项目都对预期因素产生了负荷,而一个项目(标记为VC4)预计对代表“垂直集体主义”的因素产生了负荷,对代表“水平集体主义”的因素产生了更高的负荷。认知访谈结果支持EFA的结果。剔除问题项后,拟合指标与数据拟合较好,量表具有良好的可接受信度。先前确定的模型,其中VC4分配给HC因子,HC3和HI4被排除在分析之外,证明了大多数拟合指标的拟合程度略好。为了获得有效和可靠的结果,16项个人主义和集体主义量表需要进一步发展,澄清模糊或模棱两可的术语。未来的研究还应该在更大的样本和不同的环境中重复这项研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Factorial validity and reliability of the 16-item individualism and collectivism scale for measuring cultural orientation
This study aimed to investigate the factor structure of the 16-item individualism and collectivism scale and assess its validity and reliability. The sample consisted of 299 secondary school students aged 14–16 from Turkey (N = 176), Ireland (N = 70), and England (N = 53). The total sample was divided into halves, Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was performed on the first half (N = 150) and the confirmatory factor analysis on the remaining sample (N = 149). Cognitive interviews were conducted with seven adolescents from Turkey and England to provide further evidence of validity. The mean age was 15.21 years (range 14–16 years). EFA generated a four-factor model in which all items except one loaded on the expected factors whereas the one item (labeled as VC4) that was expected to load on the factor representing ‘vertical collectivism’ loaded higher on the factor representing ‘horizontal collectivism’. Cognitive interview results supported the EFA results. After omitting the problematic item, fit indices showed a better fit to the data and the scale had good and acceptable reliability. A previously identified model, in which VC4 was assigned to the HC factor and HC3 and HI4 were excluded from the analysis, demonstrated a slightly better fit for the majority of fit indices. For valid and reliable results, the 16-item individualism and collectivism scale needs to be further developed by clarifying vague or ambiguous terms. Future research should also replicate this study with a larger sample and in different settings.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
14.30%
发文量
122
期刊介绍: IJIR is dedicated to advancing knowledge and understanding of theory, practice, and research in intergroup relations. The contents encompass theoretical developments, field-based evaluations of training techniques, empirical discussions of cultural similarities and differences, and critical descriptions of new training approaches. Papers selected for publication in IJIR are judged to increase our understanding of intergroup tensions and harmony. Issue-oriented and cross-discipline discussion is encouraged. The highest priority is given to manuscripts that join theory, practice, and field research design. By theory, we mean conceptual schemes focused on the nature of cultural differences and similarities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信