ADC直方图分析预测侵袭性脊柱肿瘤术后复发的可行性

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 Medicine
Qizheng Wang , Yongye Chen , Guangjin Zhou , Tongyu Wang , Jingchao Fang , Ke Liu , Siyuan Qin , Weili Zhao , Dapeng Hao , Ning Lang
{"title":"ADC直方图分析预测侵袭性脊柱肿瘤术后复发的可行性","authors":"Qizheng Wang ,&nbsp;Yongye Chen ,&nbsp;Guangjin Zhou ,&nbsp;Tongyu Wang ,&nbsp;Jingchao Fang ,&nbsp;Ke Liu ,&nbsp;Siyuan Qin ,&nbsp;Weili Zhao ,&nbsp;Dapeng Hao ,&nbsp;Ning Lang","doi":"10.1016/j.jbo.2025.100666","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Risk stratification of spinal tumors is a major unmet clinical need for personalized therapy.</div></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To explore the feasibility of pretreatment whole-lesion apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) histogram in predicting local recurrence of aggressive spinal tumors.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>119 aggressive spinal tumor patients (median age, 40; range, 13–74  years) confirmed by pathological findings with a mean follow-up of 36 months were enrolled and divided into the recurrence and non-recurrence group. The histogram metrics of whole-lesion, including the maximum, mean, kurtosis, skewness, entropy, and percentiles (10th, 25th, 50th, 75th, 95th) ADC values, were evaluated and take the average. Fractal dimension (FD) was assessed in the three orthogonal directions and take maximum. Clinical and general imaging features were used to construct an alternative prognostic model for comparison. Variables with statistical differences would be included in stepwise logistic regression analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>As for the clinical model, Enneking staging (odds ratio [OR]: 3.572; <em>P</em> = 0.04) and vertebral compression (OR: 4.302; <em>P</em> = 0.002) were independent predictors of recurrence. There was no statistical difference in FD between the two groups (<em>P</em> = 0.623). Among the ADC histogram parameters compared, skewness, maximum, and mean ADC values were independent risk factors and constructed ADC histogram prediction models. The ADC histogram model (AUC = 0.871) and the combined model (AUC = 0.884) performed better than the clinical prediction model (AUC = 0.704) with <em>P</em>-values of 0.004 and 0.001, respectively.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Prediction models based on the ADC histogram analysis might represent serviceable instruments for the aggressive spinal tumors.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48806,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bone Oncology","volume":"51 ","pages":"Article 100666"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Feasibility of ADC histogram analysis for predicting of postoperative recurrence in aggressive spinal tumors\",\"authors\":\"Qizheng Wang ,&nbsp;Yongye Chen ,&nbsp;Guangjin Zhou ,&nbsp;Tongyu Wang ,&nbsp;Jingchao Fang ,&nbsp;Ke Liu ,&nbsp;Siyuan Qin ,&nbsp;Weili Zhao ,&nbsp;Dapeng Hao ,&nbsp;Ning Lang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jbo.2025.100666\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Risk stratification of spinal tumors is a major unmet clinical need for personalized therapy.</div></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To explore the feasibility of pretreatment whole-lesion apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) histogram in predicting local recurrence of aggressive spinal tumors.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>119 aggressive spinal tumor patients (median age, 40; range, 13–74  years) confirmed by pathological findings with a mean follow-up of 36 months were enrolled and divided into the recurrence and non-recurrence group. The histogram metrics of whole-lesion, including the maximum, mean, kurtosis, skewness, entropy, and percentiles (10th, 25th, 50th, 75th, 95th) ADC values, were evaluated and take the average. Fractal dimension (FD) was assessed in the three orthogonal directions and take maximum. Clinical and general imaging features were used to construct an alternative prognostic model for comparison. Variables with statistical differences would be included in stepwise logistic regression analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>As for the clinical model, Enneking staging (odds ratio [OR]: 3.572; <em>P</em> = 0.04) and vertebral compression (OR: 4.302; <em>P</em> = 0.002) were independent predictors of recurrence. There was no statistical difference in FD between the two groups (<em>P</em> = 0.623). Among the ADC histogram parameters compared, skewness, maximum, and mean ADC values were independent risk factors and constructed ADC histogram prediction models. The ADC histogram model (AUC = 0.871) and the combined model (AUC = 0.884) performed better than the clinical prediction model (AUC = 0.704) with <em>P</em>-values of 0.004 and 0.001, respectively.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Prediction models based on the ADC histogram analysis might represent serviceable instruments for the aggressive spinal tumors.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48806,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Bone Oncology\",\"volume\":\"51 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100666\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Bone Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212137425000077\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Bone Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212137425000077","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景脊柱肿瘤的风险分层是目前尚未满足的个体化治疗的主要临床需求。目的探讨预处理全病灶表观扩散系数(ADC)直方图预测侵袭性脊柱肿瘤局部复发的可行性。方法119例侵袭性脊柱肿瘤患者(中位年龄40岁;纳入经病理证实的13-74岁患者,平均随访36个月,分为复发组和非复发组。评估整个病变的直方图指标,包括最大值、平均值、峰度、偏度、熵和百分位数(第10、25、50、75、95)ADC值,并取平均值。分形维数(FD)在三个正交方向上求最大值。临床和一般影像学特征被用来构建替代预后模型进行比较。有统计学差异的变量将被纳入逐步逻辑回归分析。结果临床模型中,Enneking分期(优势比[OR]: 3.572;P = 0.04)和椎体受压(OR: 4.302;P = 0.002)是复发的独立预测因子。两组FD比较差异无统计学意义(P = 0.623)。在比较的ADC直方图参数中,偏度、最大值和平均值是独立的危险因素,并构建了ADC直方图预测模型。ADC直方图模型(AUC = 0.871)和联合模型(AUC = 0.884)均优于临床预测模型(AUC = 0.704), p值分别为0.004和0.001。结论基于ADC直方图分析的预测模型是预测侵袭性脊柱肿瘤的有效工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Feasibility of ADC histogram analysis for predicting of postoperative recurrence in aggressive spinal tumors

Feasibility of ADC histogram analysis for predicting of postoperative recurrence in aggressive spinal tumors

Background

Risk stratification of spinal tumors is a major unmet clinical need for personalized therapy.

Purpose

To explore the feasibility of pretreatment whole-lesion apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) histogram in predicting local recurrence of aggressive spinal tumors.

Methods

119 aggressive spinal tumor patients (median age, 40; range, 13–74  years) confirmed by pathological findings with a mean follow-up of 36 months were enrolled and divided into the recurrence and non-recurrence group. The histogram metrics of whole-lesion, including the maximum, mean, kurtosis, skewness, entropy, and percentiles (10th, 25th, 50th, 75th, 95th) ADC values, were evaluated and take the average. Fractal dimension (FD) was assessed in the three orthogonal directions and take maximum. Clinical and general imaging features were used to construct an alternative prognostic model for comparison. Variables with statistical differences would be included in stepwise logistic regression analysis.

Results

As for the clinical model, Enneking staging (odds ratio [OR]: 3.572; P = 0.04) and vertebral compression (OR: 4.302; P = 0.002) were independent predictors of recurrence. There was no statistical difference in FD between the two groups (P = 0.623). Among the ADC histogram parameters compared, skewness, maximum, and mean ADC values were independent risk factors and constructed ADC histogram prediction models. The ADC histogram model (AUC = 0.871) and the combined model (AUC = 0.884) performed better than the clinical prediction model (AUC = 0.704) with P-values of 0.004 and 0.001, respectively.

Conclusion

Prediction models based on the ADC histogram analysis might represent serviceable instruments for the aggressive spinal tumors.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
2.90%
发文量
50
审稿时长
34 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Bone Oncology is a peer-reviewed international journal aimed at presenting basic, translational and clinical high-quality research related to bone and cancer. As the first journal dedicated to cancer induced bone diseases, JBO welcomes original research articles, review articles, editorials and opinion pieces. Case reports will only be considered in exceptional circumstances and only when accompanied by a comprehensive review of the subject. The areas covered by the journal include: Bone metastases (pathophysiology, epidemiology, diagnostics, clinical features, prevention, treatment) Preclinical models of metastasis Bone microenvironment in cancer (stem cell, bone cell and cancer interactions) Bone targeted therapy (pharmacology, therapeutic targets, drug development, clinical trials, side-effects, outcome research, health economics) Cancer treatment induced bone loss (epidemiology, pathophysiology, prevention and management) Bone imaging (clinical and animal, skeletal interventional radiology) Bone biomarkers (clinical and translational applications) Radiotherapy and radio-isotopes Skeletal complications Bone pain (mechanisms and management) Orthopaedic cancer surgery Primary bone tumours Clinical guidelines Multidisciplinary care Keywords: bisphosphonate, bone, breast cancer, cancer, CTIBL, denosumab, metastasis, myeloma, osteoblast, osteoclast, osteooncology, osteo-oncology, prostate cancer, skeleton, tumour.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信