缺乏标准化编码限制了肺栓塞诊断电子临床质量测量的准确性。

Lisa Baumann Kreuziger, Megan Keenan, Hayley Dykhoff, Marie Hall, Kyle Campbell, Emily Cahill, Ryan Hanson, Dustin McEvoy, Wei He, Sayon Dutta, Rachel P Rosovsky, Damon E Houghton
{"title":"缺乏标准化编码限制了肺栓塞诊断电子临床质量测量的准确性。","authors":"Lisa Baumann Kreuziger, Megan Keenan, Hayley Dykhoff, Marie Hall, Kyle Campbell, Emily Cahill, Ryan Hanson, Dustin McEvoy, Wei He, Sayon Dutta, Rachel P Rosovsky, Damon E Houghton","doi":"10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000223","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Guidelines for diagnosing pulmonary embolism (PE) start with a risk assessment using a pretest probability (PTP) tool, followed by D-dimer testing or computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) depending on risk. The project aimed to develop an electronic clinical quality measure (eCQM) to encourage broader use of a validated PTP scoring tool in emergency departments (EDs) to more accurately diagnose PE and to reduce unnecessary CTPAs. To identify a value set to accurately identify CTPA and abnormal D-dimer tests using standard classification systems and clinical vocabularies (ie, Current Procedural Terminology [CPT], Logical Observation Identifiers Names and Codes [LOINC], systematized nomenclature of medicine clinical terms [SNOMED CT]) across 3 academic United States health care systems. A comprehensive value set to identify CTPAs was selected, which contained 31 codes. Additionally, each health care system had unique, site-specific codes to more granularly identify CTPAs. Three health care systems representing 38 EDs from across the country submitted data from all ED encounters between September 12, 2022, and January 11, 2023. Imaging types were reviewed from each of the CPT codes and LOINC. The project evaluated whether a D-dimer was obtained using CPT and LOINC and whether the D-dimer result was elevated using SNOMED CT. The number of ED encounters, PTP use, and diagnosis of PE using different codes were determined. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value for selected codes were calculated. Over a 4-month study period, 270,214 encounters were included from 38 EDs. 11,794 ED encounters with CTPAs during the study period, using the site-specific codes were identified. The comprehensive value set had a PPV of 63.4%. Restricting the CTPA value set to CPT code 71275 or LOINC 88322-3 improved the PPV to 82% with 100% sensitivity and 99% specificity. The restricted value set captured the highest proportion of relevant site-specific codes. D-dimer values were identified using LOINC codes 48065-7 and 91556-1 at Site 1 and 48067-3 at Site 2. SNOMED CT codes were not used at any site to identify elevated D-dimer results. Different D-dimer tests with different normal ranges were used at each site, and only one site provided an abnormal flag for D-dimer results. Heterogeneity in the use of nationally standardized codes for labs and imaging tests limits the ability to measure and compare quality across health care organizations for CTPA and D-dimer results. Restricting the identification of CTPA to CPT Code 71275 or LOINC 88322-3 resulted in high sensitivity and specificity, but false positives remain. Additionally, coding for an abnormal D-dimer test result is not standardized across institutions. Therefore, the currently available value sets cannot be used to develop eCQMs whose aim is to evaluate whether CTPA is ordered appropriately based on the PTP risk level and laboratory testing.</p>","PeriodicalId":101338,"journal":{"name":"American journal of medical quality : the official journal of the American College of Medical Quality","volume":" ","pages":"38-43"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lack of Standardized Coding Limits Accuracy of Electronic Clinical Quality Measure for Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosis.\",\"authors\":\"Lisa Baumann Kreuziger, Megan Keenan, Hayley Dykhoff, Marie Hall, Kyle Campbell, Emily Cahill, Ryan Hanson, Dustin McEvoy, Wei He, Sayon Dutta, Rachel P Rosovsky, Damon E Houghton\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000223\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Guidelines for diagnosing pulmonary embolism (PE) start with a risk assessment using a pretest probability (PTP) tool, followed by D-dimer testing or computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) depending on risk. The project aimed to develop an electronic clinical quality measure (eCQM) to encourage broader use of a validated PTP scoring tool in emergency departments (EDs) to more accurately diagnose PE and to reduce unnecessary CTPAs. To identify a value set to accurately identify CTPA and abnormal D-dimer tests using standard classification systems and clinical vocabularies (ie, Current Procedural Terminology [CPT], Logical Observation Identifiers Names and Codes [LOINC], systematized nomenclature of medicine clinical terms [SNOMED CT]) across 3 academic United States health care systems. A comprehensive value set to identify CTPAs was selected, which contained 31 codes. Additionally, each health care system had unique, site-specific codes to more granularly identify CTPAs. Three health care systems representing 38 EDs from across the country submitted data from all ED encounters between September 12, 2022, and January 11, 2023. Imaging types were reviewed from each of the CPT codes and LOINC. The project evaluated whether a D-dimer was obtained using CPT and LOINC and whether the D-dimer result was elevated using SNOMED CT. The number of ED encounters, PTP use, and diagnosis of PE using different codes were determined. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value for selected codes were calculated. Over a 4-month study period, 270,214 encounters were included from 38 EDs. 11,794 ED encounters with CTPAs during the study period, using the site-specific codes were identified. The comprehensive value set had a PPV of 63.4%. Restricting the CTPA value set to CPT code 71275 or LOINC 88322-3 improved the PPV to 82% with 100% sensitivity and 99% specificity. The restricted value set captured the highest proportion of relevant site-specific codes. D-dimer values were identified using LOINC codes 48065-7 and 91556-1 at Site 1 and 48067-3 at Site 2. SNOMED CT codes were not used at any site to identify elevated D-dimer results. Different D-dimer tests with different normal ranges were used at each site, and only one site provided an abnormal flag for D-dimer results. Heterogeneity in the use of nationally standardized codes for labs and imaging tests limits the ability to measure and compare quality across health care organizations for CTPA and D-dimer results. Restricting the identification of CTPA to CPT Code 71275 or LOINC 88322-3 resulted in high sensitivity and specificity, but false positives remain. Additionally, coding for an abnormal D-dimer test result is not standardized across institutions. Therefore, the currently available value sets cannot be used to develop eCQMs whose aim is to evaluate whether CTPA is ordered appropriately based on the PTP risk level and laboratory testing.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101338,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of medical quality : the official journal of the American College of Medical Quality\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"38-43\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of medical quality : the official journal of the American College of Medical Quality\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000223\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/11 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of medical quality : the official journal of the American College of Medical Quality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000223","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

肺栓塞(PE)诊断指南首先使用预测概率(PTP)工具进行风险评估,然后根据风险进行d -二聚体测试或计算机断层肺血管造影(CTPA)。该项目旨在开发一种电子临床质量测量(eCQM),以鼓励在急诊科(ed)更广泛地使用经过验证的PTP评分工具,以更准确地诊断PE并减少不必要的ctpa。利用标准分类系统和临床词汇(即现行程序术语[CPT]、逻辑观察标识名称和代码[LOINC]、医学临床术语系统化命名法[SNOMED CT]),在美国3个学术卫生保健系统中确定一个准确识别CTPA和异常d -二聚体测试的值集。选择了一个包含31个代码的综合值集来识别ctpa。此外,每个医疗保健系统都有独特的、特定于站点的代码,以更精细地识别ctpa。代表全国38个急诊科的三个医疗保健系统提交了2022年9月12日至2023年1月11日期间所有急诊科就诊的数据。从每个CPT代码和LOINC中审查成像类型。该项目评估了使用CPT和LOINC是否获得d -二聚体,以及使用SNOMED CT是否提高d -二聚体的结果。测定不同编码的ED就诊次数、PTP使用情况和PE诊断情况。计算所选编码的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值(PPV)和阴性预测值。在4个月的研究期间,来自38个急诊科的270,214次遭遇。在研究期间,使用特定站点代码确定了11,794例与ctpa的ED接触。综合价值集的PPV为63.4%。将CTPA值设置为CPT代码71275或LOINC 88322-3可将PPV提高至82%,灵敏度为100%,特异性为99%。限制值集捕获了最高比例的相关站点特定代码。在Site 1和Site 2分别使用LOINC代码48065-7和91556-1和48067-3鉴定d -二聚体值。没有在任何部位使用SNOMED CT编码来识别d -二聚体升高的结果。在每个位点使用不同正常范围的不同d -二聚体测试,只有一个位点为d -二聚体结果提供异常标志。使用国家标准化的实验室和成像测试代码的异质性限制了衡量和比较医疗机构之间CTPA和d -二聚体结果质量的能力。将CTPA的鉴定限定为CPT Code 71275或LOINC 88322-3,灵敏性和特异性较高,但仍存在假阳性。此外,对异常d -二聚体测试结果的编码在各机构之间没有标准化。因此,目前可用的值集不能用于开发eCQMs,其目的是评估CTPA是否根据PTP风险水平和实验室测试适当订购。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Lack of Standardized Coding Limits Accuracy of Electronic Clinical Quality Measure for Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosis.

Guidelines for diagnosing pulmonary embolism (PE) start with a risk assessment using a pretest probability (PTP) tool, followed by D-dimer testing or computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) depending on risk. The project aimed to develop an electronic clinical quality measure (eCQM) to encourage broader use of a validated PTP scoring tool in emergency departments (EDs) to more accurately diagnose PE and to reduce unnecessary CTPAs. To identify a value set to accurately identify CTPA and abnormal D-dimer tests using standard classification systems and clinical vocabularies (ie, Current Procedural Terminology [CPT], Logical Observation Identifiers Names and Codes [LOINC], systematized nomenclature of medicine clinical terms [SNOMED CT]) across 3 academic United States health care systems. A comprehensive value set to identify CTPAs was selected, which contained 31 codes. Additionally, each health care system had unique, site-specific codes to more granularly identify CTPAs. Three health care systems representing 38 EDs from across the country submitted data from all ED encounters between September 12, 2022, and January 11, 2023. Imaging types were reviewed from each of the CPT codes and LOINC. The project evaluated whether a D-dimer was obtained using CPT and LOINC and whether the D-dimer result was elevated using SNOMED CT. The number of ED encounters, PTP use, and diagnosis of PE using different codes were determined. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value for selected codes were calculated. Over a 4-month study period, 270,214 encounters were included from 38 EDs. 11,794 ED encounters with CTPAs during the study period, using the site-specific codes were identified. The comprehensive value set had a PPV of 63.4%. Restricting the CTPA value set to CPT code 71275 or LOINC 88322-3 improved the PPV to 82% with 100% sensitivity and 99% specificity. The restricted value set captured the highest proportion of relevant site-specific codes. D-dimer values were identified using LOINC codes 48065-7 and 91556-1 at Site 1 and 48067-3 at Site 2. SNOMED CT codes were not used at any site to identify elevated D-dimer results. Different D-dimer tests with different normal ranges were used at each site, and only one site provided an abnormal flag for D-dimer results. Heterogeneity in the use of nationally standardized codes for labs and imaging tests limits the ability to measure and compare quality across health care organizations for CTPA and D-dimer results. Restricting the identification of CTPA to CPT Code 71275 or LOINC 88322-3 resulted in high sensitivity and specificity, but false positives remain. Additionally, coding for an abnormal D-dimer test result is not standardized across institutions. Therefore, the currently available value sets cannot be used to develop eCQMs whose aim is to evaluate whether CTPA is ordered appropriately based on the PTP risk level and laboratory testing.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信