IF 0.6 Q3 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Beliz Bilgili, Ecem Güçlü Öztürk, Gamze Tanırgan Çabaklı, Gülşen Cebecik Teomete, Merve Ergenç
{"title":"Bilateral Modified Thoracoabdominal Nerve Block Through a Perichondrial Approach in Patients Undergoing Major Abdominal Surgery: A Randomized Single-Blind Controlled Trial.","authors":"Beliz Bilgili, Ecem Güçlü Öztürk, Gamze Tanırgan Çabaklı, Gülşen Cebecik Teomete, Merve Ergenç","doi":"10.4274/TJAR.2025.241752","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Modified thoracoabdominal nerve block with a perichondrial approach (M-TAPA) provides effective analgesia in the anterior and lateral thoracoabdominal regions. Previous studies have shown the efficacy of M-TAPA in laparoscopic surgery. The primary aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of M-TAPA block in patients undergoing open major abdominal surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was designed as a prospective, randomized, single-blind, controlled study. A total of 43 patients were included in the study. In group M-TAPA, the block was performed bilaterally at the end of the surgery. Local wound infiltration was performed on the control group. Postoperative analgesia was provided with patient-controlled intravenous morphine. When numeric rating scale (NRS) pain scores exceeded 4, rescue analgesia with tramadol was administered. The primary outcome of this study was to compare the 24-hour total morphine consumption. The secondary outcomes included comparing pain scores, rescue analgesia requirements, and patient satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Regarding our primary outcome, median morphine consumption during the first 24 hours was lower in the M-TAPA group [16 (14-18)] than in the control group [24.5 (19.5-27)] (<i>P</i> < 0.01, 95% confidence interval: -9, 42 and -3.01). Additionally, NRS scores were significantly lower and patient satisfaction was significantly higher in the M-TAPA group. The need for rescue analgesics in the first 24 hours was comparable among the study groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The M-TAPA block is an effective abdominal wall block that can be considered part of multimodal analgesia in open major abdominal surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":23353,"journal":{"name":"Turkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation","volume":"53 1","pages":"12-19"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11827508/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4274/TJAR.2025.241752","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:改良胸腹神经阻滞术(Modified thoracoabdominal nerve block with a perichondrial approach,M-TAPA)可为胸腹前部和外侧区域提供有效的镇痛。之前的研究表明,M-TAPA 在腹腔镜手术中具有很好的疗效。本研究的主要目的是调查 M-TAPA 阻滞在开腹大手术患者中的疗效:本研究是一项前瞻性、随机、单盲对照研究。研究共纳入 43 名患者。在 M-TAPA 组中,手术结束时进行双侧阻滞。对照组进行局部伤口浸润。术后镇痛由患者自控静脉注射吗啡。当数字评定量表(NRS)疼痛评分超过4分时,使用曲马多进行抢救性镇痛。本研究的主要结果是比较 24 小时吗啡总消耗量。次要结果包括疼痛评分、抢救性镇痛需求和患者满意度的比较:在主要结果方面,M-TAPA 组前 24 小时吗啡消耗量中位数[16(14-18)]低于对照组[24.5(19.5-27)](P < 0.01,95% 置信区间:-9、42 和 -3.01)。此外,M-TAPA 组的 NRS 评分明显更低,患者满意度明显更高。各研究组在最初 24 小时内对镇痛药的需求相当:结论:M-TAPA阻滞是一种有效的腹壁阻滞,可作为开腹大手术多模式镇痛的一部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Bilateral Modified Thoracoabdominal Nerve Block Through a Perichondrial Approach in Patients Undergoing Major Abdominal Surgery: A Randomized Single-Blind Controlled Trial.

Objective: Modified thoracoabdominal nerve block with a perichondrial approach (M-TAPA) provides effective analgesia in the anterior and lateral thoracoabdominal regions. Previous studies have shown the efficacy of M-TAPA in laparoscopic surgery. The primary aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of M-TAPA block in patients undergoing open major abdominal surgery.

Methods: This study was designed as a prospective, randomized, single-blind, controlled study. A total of 43 patients were included in the study. In group M-TAPA, the block was performed bilaterally at the end of the surgery. Local wound infiltration was performed on the control group. Postoperative analgesia was provided with patient-controlled intravenous morphine. When numeric rating scale (NRS) pain scores exceeded 4, rescue analgesia with tramadol was administered. The primary outcome of this study was to compare the 24-hour total morphine consumption. The secondary outcomes included comparing pain scores, rescue analgesia requirements, and patient satisfaction.

Results: Regarding our primary outcome, median morphine consumption during the first 24 hours was lower in the M-TAPA group [16 (14-18)] than in the control group [24.5 (19.5-27)] (P < 0.01, 95% confidence interval: -9, 42 and -3.01). Additionally, NRS scores were significantly lower and patient satisfaction was significantly higher in the M-TAPA group. The need for rescue analgesics in the first 24 hours was comparable among the study groups.

Conclusion: The M-TAPA block is an effective abdominal wall block that can be considered part of multimodal analgesia in open major abdominal surgery.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信