Marcel Silva Luz, Caroline Tianeze de Castro, Fabian Fellipe Bueno Lemos, Gabriel Reis Rocha, Gabriel Lima Correa Santos, Samuel Luca Rocha Pinheiro, Luis Guilherme de Oliveira Silva, Mariana Santos Calmon, Márcio Vasconcelos Oliveira, Kádima Nayara Teixeira, Dulciene Maria de Magalhães Queiroz, Fabrício Freire de Melo
{"title":"成人幽门螺杆菌感染的粪便抗原检测:诊断测试准确性的荟萃分析。","authors":"Marcel Silva Luz, Caroline Tianeze de Castro, Fabian Fellipe Bueno Lemos, Gabriel Reis Rocha, Gabriel Lima Correa Santos, Samuel Luca Rocha Pinheiro, Luis Guilherme de Oliveira Silva, Mariana Santos Calmon, Márcio Vasconcelos Oliveira, Kádima Nayara Teixeira, Dulciene Maria de Magalhães Queiroz, Fabrício Freire de Melo","doi":"10.1097/MCG.0000000000002102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The stool antigen test (SAT) is a convenient noninvasive option for the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori ( H. pylori ) infection. However, despite having been previously evaluated, there is currently a lack of evidence regarding the comparative accuracy of conventional and rapid SATs utilizing monoclonal or polyclonal antibodies in adults. Here, we perform a thorough statistical synthesis to determine and compare the diagnostic accuracy of conventional and rapid SATs for the diagnosis of H. pylori infection in adults.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We conducted independent searches through July 25, 2023, for studies evaluating the accuracy of SAT against a reference standard. We assessed methodological quality using Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 and calculated overall accuracy measures using the bivariate random-effect model. We also conducted subgroup analyses based on model and assessment technique, and Spearman correlation analysis to investigate a possible threshold effect. We generated summary receiver operating characteristic curves to assess heterogeneity and evaluated publication bias.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Conventional SAT demonstrated superior sensitivity (92.19% vs 85.79%), specificity (92.93% vs 91.18%), likelihood ratios (LR+ 9.68 vs 8.16; LR- 0.10 vs 0.15), and area under the curve (0.958 vs 0.940) compared with rapid SAT. Notably, the diagnostic odds ratio for conventional SAT (114.70) significantly outperformed rapid SAT (diagnostic odds ratio: 57.72). Correlation analysis revealed no threshold effect and summary receiver operating characteristic curves showed consistent accuracy for both tests.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study establishes evidence of the superior diagnostic accuracy of conventional SATs over rapid SATs for detecting H. pylori infection in adults. Also, we provide valuable insights into the impact of using monoclonal or polyclonal antibodies and different assessment techniques on diagnostic accuracy measures.</p>","PeriodicalId":15457,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical gastroenterology","volume":" ","pages":"393-404"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Stool Antigen Test for Helicobacter Pylori Infection in Adults : A Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy.\",\"authors\":\"Marcel Silva Luz, Caroline Tianeze de Castro, Fabian Fellipe Bueno Lemos, Gabriel Reis Rocha, Gabriel Lima Correa Santos, Samuel Luca Rocha Pinheiro, Luis Guilherme de Oliveira Silva, Mariana Santos Calmon, Márcio Vasconcelos Oliveira, Kádima Nayara Teixeira, Dulciene Maria de Magalhães Queiroz, Fabrício Freire de Melo\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MCG.0000000000002102\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The stool antigen test (SAT) is a convenient noninvasive option for the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori ( H. pylori ) infection. However, despite having been previously evaluated, there is currently a lack of evidence regarding the comparative accuracy of conventional and rapid SATs utilizing monoclonal or polyclonal antibodies in adults. Here, we perform a thorough statistical synthesis to determine and compare the diagnostic accuracy of conventional and rapid SATs for the diagnosis of H. pylori infection in adults.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We conducted independent searches through July 25, 2023, for studies evaluating the accuracy of SAT against a reference standard. We assessed methodological quality using Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 and calculated overall accuracy measures using the bivariate random-effect model. We also conducted subgroup analyses based on model and assessment technique, and Spearman correlation analysis to investigate a possible threshold effect. We generated summary receiver operating characteristic curves to assess heterogeneity and evaluated publication bias.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Conventional SAT demonstrated superior sensitivity (92.19% vs 85.79%), specificity (92.93% vs 91.18%), likelihood ratios (LR+ 9.68 vs 8.16; LR- 0.10 vs 0.15), and area under the curve (0.958 vs 0.940) compared with rapid SAT. Notably, the diagnostic odds ratio for conventional SAT (114.70) significantly outperformed rapid SAT (diagnostic odds ratio: 57.72). Correlation analysis revealed no threshold effect and summary receiver operating characteristic curves showed consistent accuracy for both tests.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study establishes evidence of the superior diagnostic accuracy of conventional SATs over rapid SATs for detecting H. pylori infection in adults. Also, we provide valuable insights into the impact of using monoclonal or polyclonal antibodies and different assessment techniques on diagnostic accuracy measures.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15457,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of clinical gastroenterology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"393-404\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of clinical gastroenterology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MCG.0000000000002102\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/7 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MCG.0000000000002102","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:大便抗原检测(SAT)是诊断幽门螺杆菌(h.p ylori)感染的一种便捷的无创方法。然而,尽管先前已经进行了评估,但目前缺乏关于在成人中使用单克隆或多克隆抗体的常规和快速SATs的比较准确性的证据。在这里,我们进行了全面的统计综合,以确定和比较常规和快速sat诊断成人幽门螺杆菌感染的诊断准确性。材料和方法:我们在2023年7月25日之前进行了独立搜索,以评估SAT与参考标准的准确性。我们使用诊断准确性研究质量评估-2评估方法学质量,并使用双变量随机效应模型计算总体准确性。我们还进行了基于模型和评估技术的亚组分析,并进行了Spearman相关分析以探讨可能的阈值效应。我们生成了汇总的受试者工作特征曲线来评估异质性和评价发表偏倚。结果:传统SAT表现出更高的灵敏度(92.19% vs 85.79%)、特异性(92.93% vs 91.18%)、似然比(LR+ 9.68 vs 8.16;与快速SAT相比,LR- 0.10 vs 0.15),曲线下面积(0.958 vs 0.940)。值得注意的是,常规SAT的诊断优势比(114.70)显著优于快速SAT(诊断优势比:57.72)。相关分析显示无阈值效应,两种试验的总体受试者工作特征曲线准确度一致。结论:我们的研究建立了常规SATs在检测成人幽门螺杆菌感染方面优于快速SATs的诊断准确性的证据。此外,我们对使用单克隆或多克隆抗体和不同评估技术对诊断准确性测量的影响提供了有价值的见解。
Stool Antigen Test for Helicobacter Pylori Infection in Adults : A Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy.
Objective: The stool antigen test (SAT) is a convenient noninvasive option for the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori ( H. pylori ) infection. However, despite having been previously evaluated, there is currently a lack of evidence regarding the comparative accuracy of conventional and rapid SATs utilizing monoclonal or polyclonal antibodies in adults. Here, we perform a thorough statistical synthesis to determine and compare the diagnostic accuracy of conventional and rapid SATs for the diagnosis of H. pylori infection in adults.
Materials and methods: We conducted independent searches through July 25, 2023, for studies evaluating the accuracy of SAT against a reference standard. We assessed methodological quality using Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 and calculated overall accuracy measures using the bivariate random-effect model. We also conducted subgroup analyses based on model and assessment technique, and Spearman correlation analysis to investigate a possible threshold effect. We generated summary receiver operating characteristic curves to assess heterogeneity and evaluated publication bias.
Results: Conventional SAT demonstrated superior sensitivity (92.19% vs 85.79%), specificity (92.93% vs 91.18%), likelihood ratios (LR+ 9.68 vs 8.16; LR- 0.10 vs 0.15), and area under the curve (0.958 vs 0.940) compared with rapid SAT. Notably, the diagnostic odds ratio for conventional SAT (114.70) significantly outperformed rapid SAT (diagnostic odds ratio: 57.72). Correlation analysis revealed no threshold effect and summary receiver operating characteristic curves showed consistent accuracy for both tests.
Conclusion: Our study establishes evidence of the superior diagnostic accuracy of conventional SATs over rapid SATs for detecting H. pylori infection in adults. Also, we provide valuable insights into the impact of using monoclonal or polyclonal antibodies and different assessment techniques on diagnostic accuracy measures.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology gathers the world''s latest, most relevant clinical studies and reviews, case reports, and technical expertise in a single source. Regular features include cutting-edge, peer-reviewed articles and clinical reviews that put the latest research and development into the context of your practice. Also included are biographies, focused organ reviews, practice management, and therapeutic recommendations.