少参与,多提供:巴基斯坦社区卫生工作者对如何克服反对脊髓灰质炎疫苗接种的看法。

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Global Public Health Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-11 DOI:10.1080/17441692.2025.2465645
Arman Majidulla, Marium A Sultan, Ayesha Zaman, Muhammad Shafique, Saeed Ahmed, Farah Naz, Sadaf Nayyab, Ali Sohail
{"title":"少参与,多提供:巴基斯坦社区卫生工作者对如何克服反对脊髓灰质炎疫苗接种的看法。","authors":"Arman Majidulla, Marium A Sultan, Ayesha Zaman, Muhammad Shafique, Saeed Ahmed, Farah Naz, Sadaf Nayyab, Ali Sohail","doi":"10.1080/17441692.2025.2465645","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Pakistan has 40 Super High Risk Union Councils (SHRUCs) where polio has been persistently endemic, and community relationships have been a persistent challenge due to campaign fatigue and violent, organised resistance. This study aimed to gather perspectives from frontline workers in these areas to improve community engagement. We conducted participant observation, over 100 interviews, and held Human-centred Design inspired sessions with 171 teams of frontline polio staff from 2020 to 2022 in the SHRUCs of a major city in Pakistan. The results show that frontline polio workers repeatedly visited households broadly neglected by government services in SHRUCs, but some households refused the vaccine due to fatigue from multiple visits and fear of government surveillance. Others refused the vaccine to draw attention to their more pressing needs. Frontline polio workers suggested that decreasing touchpoints and providing additional services, such as food, medicines, primary health care, and sanitation services, would improve vaccine uptake. We discuss several implications for vaccine communications, including the importance of quality engagement, the legitimacy of rumours surrounding vaccination, the limited applicability of 'vaccine hesitancy', and the critical role of service provision in improving vaccine acceptability.</p>","PeriodicalId":12735,"journal":{"name":"Global Public Health","volume":"20 1","pages":"2465645"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Engage less, provide more: Community health workers' perspectives on how to overcome opposition to polio vaccination in Pakistan.\",\"authors\":\"Arman Majidulla, Marium A Sultan, Ayesha Zaman, Muhammad Shafique, Saeed Ahmed, Farah Naz, Sadaf Nayyab, Ali Sohail\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17441692.2025.2465645\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Pakistan has 40 Super High Risk Union Councils (SHRUCs) where polio has been persistently endemic, and community relationships have been a persistent challenge due to campaign fatigue and violent, organised resistance. This study aimed to gather perspectives from frontline workers in these areas to improve community engagement. We conducted participant observation, over 100 interviews, and held Human-centred Design inspired sessions with 171 teams of frontline polio staff from 2020 to 2022 in the SHRUCs of a major city in Pakistan. The results show that frontline polio workers repeatedly visited households broadly neglected by government services in SHRUCs, but some households refused the vaccine due to fatigue from multiple visits and fear of government surveillance. Others refused the vaccine to draw attention to their more pressing needs. Frontline polio workers suggested that decreasing touchpoints and providing additional services, such as food, medicines, primary health care, and sanitation services, would improve vaccine uptake. We discuss several implications for vaccine communications, including the importance of quality engagement, the legitimacy of rumours surrounding vaccination, the limited applicability of 'vaccine hesitancy', and the critical role of service provision in improving vaccine acceptability.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12735,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Public Health\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"2465645\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Public Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17441692.2025.2465645\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/11 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17441692.2025.2465645","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

巴基斯坦有40个超高风险联盟理事会(SHRUCs),脊髓灰质炎在这些地区持续流行,由于运动疲劳和有组织的暴力抵抗,社区关系一直是一项挑战。本研究旨在收集这些领域一线工作者的观点,以提高社区参与度。从2020年到2022年,我们在巴基斯坦一个主要城市的社区卫生中心对171个一线脊髓灰质炎工作人员小组进行了参与者观察、100多次访谈和以人为本的设计启发会议。结果表明,一线脊髓灰质炎工作人员多次访问被政府服务广泛忽视的家庭,但由于多次访问的疲劳和害怕政府监督,一些家庭拒绝接种疫苗。其他人拒绝接种疫苗,以引起人们对他们更紧迫需求的关注。一线脊髓灰质炎工作人员建议,减少接触点并提供额外服务,如食品、药品、初级卫生保健和卫生服务,将改善疫苗的吸收。我们讨论了疫苗传播的几个影响,包括高质量参与的重要性,围绕疫苗接种的谣言的合法性,“疫苗犹豫”的有限适用性,以及服务提供在提高疫苗可接受性方面的关键作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Engage less, provide more: Community health workers' perspectives on how to overcome opposition to polio vaccination in Pakistan.

Pakistan has 40 Super High Risk Union Councils (SHRUCs) where polio has been persistently endemic, and community relationships have been a persistent challenge due to campaign fatigue and violent, organised resistance. This study aimed to gather perspectives from frontline workers in these areas to improve community engagement. We conducted participant observation, over 100 interviews, and held Human-centred Design inspired sessions with 171 teams of frontline polio staff from 2020 to 2022 in the SHRUCs of a major city in Pakistan. The results show that frontline polio workers repeatedly visited households broadly neglected by government services in SHRUCs, but some households refused the vaccine due to fatigue from multiple visits and fear of government surveillance. Others refused the vaccine to draw attention to their more pressing needs. Frontline polio workers suggested that decreasing touchpoints and providing additional services, such as food, medicines, primary health care, and sanitation services, would improve vaccine uptake. We discuss several implications for vaccine communications, including the importance of quality engagement, the legitimacy of rumours surrounding vaccination, the limited applicability of 'vaccine hesitancy', and the critical role of service provision in improving vaccine acceptability.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Global Public Health
Global Public Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
3.00%
发文量
120
期刊介绍: Global Public Health is an essential peer-reviewed journal that energetically engages with key public health issues that have come to the fore in the global environment — mounting inequalities between rich and poor; the globalization of trade; new patterns of travel and migration; epidemics of newly-emerging and re-emerging infectious diseases; the HIV/AIDS pandemic; the increase in chronic illnesses; escalating pressure on public health infrastructures around the world; and the growing range and scale of conflict situations, terrorist threats, environmental pressures, natural and human-made disasters.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信