性别转型的机会?联合国妇女署应对COVID-19的政策。

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Global Public Health Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-11 DOI:10.1080/17441692.2025.2462626
Asha Herten-Crabb, Alice Mũrage, Julia Smith, Clare Wenham
{"title":"性别转型的机会?联合国妇女署应对COVID-19的政策。","authors":"Asha Herten-Crabb, Alice Mũrage, Julia Smith, Clare Wenham","doi":"10.1080/17441692.2025.2462626","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Pandemics disproportionately affect women due to their dominant roles in healthcare, caregiving, and industries vulnerable to public health policies. Women face higher infection risks, greater unpaid care burdens, and job losses during crises. Violence against women and disrupted access to healthcare, including sexual and reproductive services, also increase. Despite clear evidence of these effects, global pandemic responses have historically been gender-blind, with only limited improvements during COVID-19. This study uses the READ approach to analyze UN Women COVID-19 policy documents published in 2020, examining recommendations related to socio-economic security, violence against women and girls (VAWG), and people living across borders. From these documents we also analyzed 301 recommendations using the WHO's Gender Responsive Scale to assess their transformative potential. The results show that while UN Women addressed key gendered impacts, the recommendations often stopped short of promoting systemic change, reflecting broader limitations in global health responses. The findings highlight the gap between acknowledging gender disparities and promoting (let alone implementing) transformative policies that address structural inequalities. This research contributes to ongoing debates on the role of global institutions in advancing gender-responsive pandemic policies and calls for more meaningful engagement in addressing gender inequities in global health governance.</p>","PeriodicalId":12735,"journal":{"name":"Global Public Health","volume":"20 1","pages":"2462626"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An opportunity for gender transformation? UN Women's policy response to COVID-19.\",\"authors\":\"Asha Herten-Crabb, Alice Mũrage, Julia Smith, Clare Wenham\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17441692.2025.2462626\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Pandemics disproportionately affect women due to their dominant roles in healthcare, caregiving, and industries vulnerable to public health policies. Women face higher infection risks, greater unpaid care burdens, and job losses during crises. Violence against women and disrupted access to healthcare, including sexual and reproductive services, also increase. Despite clear evidence of these effects, global pandemic responses have historically been gender-blind, with only limited improvements during COVID-19. This study uses the READ approach to analyze UN Women COVID-19 policy documents published in 2020, examining recommendations related to socio-economic security, violence against women and girls (VAWG), and people living across borders. From these documents we also analyzed 301 recommendations using the WHO's Gender Responsive Scale to assess their transformative potential. The results show that while UN Women addressed key gendered impacts, the recommendations often stopped short of promoting systemic change, reflecting broader limitations in global health responses. The findings highlight the gap between acknowledging gender disparities and promoting (let alone implementing) transformative policies that address structural inequalities. This research contributes to ongoing debates on the role of global institutions in advancing gender-responsive pandemic policies and calls for more meaningful engagement in addressing gender inequities in global health governance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12735,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Public Health\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"2462626\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Public Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17441692.2025.2462626\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/11 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17441692.2025.2462626","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于妇女在保健、护理和易受公共卫生政策影响的行业中占主导地位,大流行病对妇女的影响尤为严重。妇女在危机期间面临更高的感染风险、更大的无偿护理负担和失业。针对妇女的暴力行为以及无法获得保健服务,包括性服务和生殖服务的情况也有所增加。尽管存在这些影响的明确证据,但全球大流行应对措施历来是不分性别的,在2019冠状病毒病期间只有有限的改善。本研究采用READ方法分析了联合国妇女署于2020年发布的2019冠状病毒病政策文件,审查了与社会经济安全、暴力侵害妇女和女童行为以及跨境居民有关的建议。从这些文件中,我们还使用世卫组织性别促进量表分析了301项建议,以评估其变革潜力。结果表明,虽然联合国妇女署处理了关键的性别影响,但这些建议往往没有促进系统性变革,反映了全球卫生应对工作中更广泛的局限性。调查结果凸显了承认性别差异与促进(更不用说实施)解决结构性不平等的变革政策之间的差距。这项研究有助于就全球机构在推进促进性别平等的大流行病政策方面的作用进行辩论,并呼吁更有意义地参与解决全球卫生治理中的性别不平等问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An opportunity for gender transformation? UN Women's policy response to COVID-19.

Pandemics disproportionately affect women due to their dominant roles in healthcare, caregiving, and industries vulnerable to public health policies. Women face higher infection risks, greater unpaid care burdens, and job losses during crises. Violence against women and disrupted access to healthcare, including sexual and reproductive services, also increase. Despite clear evidence of these effects, global pandemic responses have historically been gender-blind, with only limited improvements during COVID-19. This study uses the READ approach to analyze UN Women COVID-19 policy documents published in 2020, examining recommendations related to socio-economic security, violence against women and girls (VAWG), and people living across borders. From these documents we also analyzed 301 recommendations using the WHO's Gender Responsive Scale to assess their transformative potential. The results show that while UN Women addressed key gendered impacts, the recommendations often stopped short of promoting systemic change, reflecting broader limitations in global health responses. The findings highlight the gap between acknowledging gender disparities and promoting (let alone implementing) transformative policies that address structural inequalities. This research contributes to ongoing debates on the role of global institutions in advancing gender-responsive pandemic policies and calls for more meaningful engagement in addressing gender inequities in global health governance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Global Public Health
Global Public Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
3.00%
发文量
120
期刊介绍: Global Public Health is an essential peer-reviewed journal that energetically engages with key public health issues that have come to the fore in the global environment — mounting inequalities between rich and poor; the globalization of trade; new patterns of travel and migration; epidemics of newly-emerging and re-emerging infectious diseases; the HIV/AIDS pandemic; the increase in chronic illnesses; escalating pressure on public health infrastructures around the world; and the growing range and scale of conflict situations, terrorist threats, environmental pressures, natural and human-made disasters.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信