Nesma M Allam, Nabil Mahmoud Abdel-Aal, Khadra M Ali, Hadaya Mosaad Eladl
{"title":"感知运动训练对下肢热烧伤后稳定性、活动能力和生活质量的影响:前瞻性随机对照试验。","authors":"Nesma M Allam, Nabil Mahmoud Abdel-Aal, Khadra M Ali, Hadaya Mosaad Eladl","doi":"10.1177/02692155251318560","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveTo determine the effect of sensorimotor training on stability, balance, mobility, quality of life, and muscle strength after lower extremity and trunk thermal burns.DesignA prospective, randomised controlled trial.SettingPhysiotherapy outpatient setting.ParticipantsSixty participants with lower extremity and trunk thermal burns, aged 20-50 years, were randomly allocated to either the Sensorimotor Training group or the Control group.InterventionThe Sensorimotor Training group received both a sensorimotor training programme and a traditional physiotherapy programme, while the Control group received only the traditional physiotherapy programme. The intervention was applied three days per week for eight weeks.Outcome measuresThe anteroposterior stability index was the primary outcome, while secondary outcomes included the overall stability index, mediolateral stability index, Timed Up and Go Test, Berg Balance Scale, and the Short Form-36 questionnaire, all measured at baseline and after eight weeks.ResultsSignificant differences were identified between groups after eight weeks, favouring the Sensorimotor Training group. Mean differences (95% CI) between groups were: -0.89 (-1.23, -0.54) for the anteroposterior stability index; 6.67 (4.48, 8.86) for the Berg Balance Scale; -1.7 (-2.82, -0.59) for the Timed Up and Go Test; 11.22 (7.03, 15.40) for knee extensor torque; and 7.98 (4.62, 11.35) for physical function.ConclusionSensorimotor training, when added to a conventional physiotherapy programme, can significantly improve stability, balance, mobility, quality of life, and muscle strength compared to conventional physiotherapy alone in participants with lower extremity and trunk thermal burns.</p>","PeriodicalId":10441,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"460-470"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of sensorimotor training on stability, mobility, and quality of life after lower extremity thermal burns: A prospective randomised controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Nesma M Allam, Nabil Mahmoud Abdel-Aal, Khadra M Ali, Hadaya Mosaad Eladl\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/02692155251318560\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>ObjectiveTo determine the effect of sensorimotor training on stability, balance, mobility, quality of life, and muscle strength after lower extremity and trunk thermal burns.DesignA prospective, randomised controlled trial.SettingPhysiotherapy outpatient setting.ParticipantsSixty participants with lower extremity and trunk thermal burns, aged 20-50 years, were randomly allocated to either the Sensorimotor Training group or the Control group.InterventionThe Sensorimotor Training group received both a sensorimotor training programme and a traditional physiotherapy programme, while the Control group received only the traditional physiotherapy programme. The intervention was applied three days per week for eight weeks.Outcome measuresThe anteroposterior stability index was the primary outcome, while secondary outcomes included the overall stability index, mediolateral stability index, Timed Up and Go Test, Berg Balance Scale, and the Short Form-36 questionnaire, all measured at baseline and after eight weeks.ResultsSignificant differences were identified between groups after eight weeks, favouring the Sensorimotor Training group. Mean differences (95% CI) between groups were: -0.89 (-1.23, -0.54) for the anteroposterior stability index; 6.67 (4.48, 8.86) for the Berg Balance Scale; -1.7 (-2.82, -0.59) for the Timed Up and Go Test; 11.22 (7.03, 15.40) for knee extensor torque; and 7.98 (4.62, 11.35) for physical function.ConclusionSensorimotor training, when added to a conventional physiotherapy programme, can significantly improve stability, balance, mobility, quality of life, and muscle strength compared to conventional physiotherapy alone in participants with lower extremity and trunk thermal burns.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10441,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"460-470\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/02692155251318560\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/11 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02692155251318560","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:探讨感觉运动训练对下肢和躯干热烧伤后稳定性、平衡性、活动能力、生活质量和肌力的影响。设计:前瞻性、随机对照试验。设置:物理治疗门诊设置。参与者:60名下肢和躯干热烧伤的参与者,年龄20-50岁,随机分为感觉运动训练组和对照组。干预:感觉运动训练组同时接受感觉运动训练计划和传统物理治疗计划,而对照组只接受传统物理治疗计划。干预措施每周应用三天,持续八周。结果测量:前后稳定性指数是主要结果,次要结果包括总体稳定性指数、中外侧稳定性指数、Timed Up and Go测试、Berg平衡量表和短表格-36问卷,均在基线和8周后测量。结果:8周后,两组之间发现了显著差异,感觉运动训练组更有利。各组间的平均差异(95% CI)为:前后稳定性指数为-0.89 (-1.23,-0.54);伯格平衡量表为6.67 (4.48,8.86);-1.7分(-2.82分,-0.59分);11.22(7.03, 15.40)为膝关节伸肌扭矩;物理功能为7.98(4.62,11.35)。结论:与常规物理治疗方案相比,感觉运动训练与常规物理治疗方案相结合,可显著改善下肢和躯干热烧伤患者的稳定性、平衡性、活动能力、生活质量和肌肉力量。
Effect of sensorimotor training on stability, mobility, and quality of life after lower extremity thermal burns: A prospective randomised controlled trial.
ObjectiveTo determine the effect of sensorimotor training on stability, balance, mobility, quality of life, and muscle strength after lower extremity and trunk thermal burns.DesignA prospective, randomised controlled trial.SettingPhysiotherapy outpatient setting.ParticipantsSixty participants with lower extremity and trunk thermal burns, aged 20-50 years, were randomly allocated to either the Sensorimotor Training group or the Control group.InterventionThe Sensorimotor Training group received both a sensorimotor training programme and a traditional physiotherapy programme, while the Control group received only the traditional physiotherapy programme. The intervention was applied three days per week for eight weeks.Outcome measuresThe anteroposterior stability index was the primary outcome, while secondary outcomes included the overall stability index, mediolateral stability index, Timed Up and Go Test, Berg Balance Scale, and the Short Form-36 questionnaire, all measured at baseline and after eight weeks.ResultsSignificant differences were identified between groups after eight weeks, favouring the Sensorimotor Training group. Mean differences (95% CI) between groups were: -0.89 (-1.23, -0.54) for the anteroposterior stability index; 6.67 (4.48, 8.86) for the Berg Balance Scale; -1.7 (-2.82, -0.59) for the Timed Up and Go Test; 11.22 (7.03, 15.40) for knee extensor torque; and 7.98 (4.62, 11.35) for physical function.ConclusionSensorimotor training, when added to a conventional physiotherapy programme, can significantly improve stability, balance, mobility, quality of life, and muscle strength compared to conventional physiotherapy alone in participants with lower extremity and trunk thermal burns.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Rehabilitation covering the whole field of disability and rehabilitation, this peer-reviewed journal publishes research and discussion articles and acts as a forum for the international dissemination and exchange of information amongst the large number of professionals involved in rehabilitation. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)