低负荷血流量限制训练和高负荷阻力训练对股四头肌力量、动态稳定性和功能表现的影响。

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
I Putu Gde Surya Adhitya, I Gusti Ngurah Wien Aryana, Ida Kurniawati, Sayu Aryantari Putri Thanaya, Made Bang Redy Utama
{"title":"低负荷血流量限制训练和高负荷阻力训练对股四头肌力量、动态稳定性和功能表现的影响。","authors":"I Putu Gde Surya Adhitya, I Gusti Ngurah Wien Aryana, Ida Kurniawati, Sayu Aryantari Putri Thanaya, Made Bang Redy Utama","doi":"10.1097/JSM.0000000000001330","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Blood flow restriction (BFR) is a method used to affix a pneumatic cuff to the uppermost part of a leg. Blood flow restriction is often combined with low load-blood flow restriction training (LL-BFRt) to enhance strength and promote muscle hypertrophy. Therefore, this research aimed to examine the effect of LL-BFRt, sham LL-BFRt, and high load-resistance training (HL-Rt) on quadriceps strength (QS), dynamic stability, and functional performance.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Single-blinded randomized trial method.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>A private physical therapy clinic in Bali, Indonesia.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Data were collected from 63 basketball and rugby players assigned to 3 intervention groups, namely, LL-BFRt, sham LL-BFRt, and HL-Rt, through block randomization.</p><p><strong>Independent variables: </strong>Each participant received intervention consisting of 45-minute sessions twice per week for 8 weeks.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures: </strong>Quadriceps strength, star excursion balance test (SEBT), and single-leg hop test (SLHT) were evaluated in baseline, 4 weeks, and 8 weeks of the intervention period.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In LL-BFRt and HL-Rt groups, QS, SEBT, and SLHT scores were significantly improved during 8-week intervention period, except in sham LL-BFRt group. Furthermore, there was a significant improvement in LL-BFRt (QS: 9.2-33.5 Newton; SEBT: 1.2-11.1 cm; SLHT: 1.3-9.8 cm, P-values < 0.05) and HL-Rt groups (QS: 15.4-35.9 Newton; SEBT: 2.2-9.0 cm; SLHT: 4.5-15.8 cm, P < 0.05) compared with sham LL-BFRt.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The improvements attained by participants using LL-BFRt and HL-Rt were comparable and capable of improving QS, SEBT, and SLHT more than sham LL-BFRt.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>NCT05951036.</p>","PeriodicalId":10355,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Low-Load Blood Flow Restriction Training and High-Load Resistance Training on Quadriceps Strength, Dynamic Stability, and Functional Performance.\",\"authors\":\"I Putu Gde Surya Adhitya, I Gusti Ngurah Wien Aryana, Ida Kurniawati, Sayu Aryantari Putri Thanaya, Made Bang Redy Utama\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/JSM.0000000000001330\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Blood flow restriction (BFR) is a method used to affix a pneumatic cuff to the uppermost part of a leg. Blood flow restriction is often combined with low load-blood flow restriction training (LL-BFRt) to enhance strength and promote muscle hypertrophy. Therefore, this research aimed to examine the effect of LL-BFRt, sham LL-BFRt, and high load-resistance training (HL-Rt) on quadriceps strength (QS), dynamic stability, and functional performance.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Single-blinded randomized trial method.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>A private physical therapy clinic in Bali, Indonesia.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Data were collected from 63 basketball and rugby players assigned to 3 intervention groups, namely, LL-BFRt, sham LL-BFRt, and HL-Rt, through block randomization.</p><p><strong>Independent variables: </strong>Each participant received intervention consisting of 45-minute sessions twice per week for 8 weeks.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures: </strong>Quadriceps strength, star excursion balance test (SEBT), and single-leg hop test (SLHT) were evaluated in baseline, 4 weeks, and 8 weeks of the intervention period.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In LL-BFRt and HL-Rt groups, QS, SEBT, and SLHT scores were significantly improved during 8-week intervention period, except in sham LL-BFRt group. Furthermore, there was a significant improvement in LL-BFRt (QS: 9.2-33.5 Newton; SEBT: 1.2-11.1 cm; SLHT: 1.3-9.8 cm, P-values < 0.05) and HL-Rt groups (QS: 15.4-35.9 Newton; SEBT: 2.2-9.0 cm; SLHT: 4.5-15.8 cm, P < 0.05) compared with sham LL-BFRt.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The improvements attained by participants using LL-BFRt and HL-Rt were comparable and capable of improving QS, SEBT, and SLHT more than sham LL-BFRt.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>NCT05951036.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10355,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/JSM.0000000000001330\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JSM.0000000000001330","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:血流量限制(BFR)是一种将气动袖带固定在腿上部的方法。血流限制通常与低负荷血流限制训练(LL-BFRt)相结合,以增强力量和促进肌肉肥大。因此,本研究旨在探讨LL-BFRt、假LL-BFRt和高负荷阻力训练(HL-Rt)对股四头肌力量(QS)、动态稳定性和功能性能的影响。设计:单盲随机试验方法。背景:印度尼西亚巴厘岛的一家私人理疗诊所。研究对象:63名篮球和橄榄球运动员的数据采用分组随机法分为3个干预组,即LL-BFRt、假LL-BFRt和HL-Rt。独立变量:每位参与者接受干预,包括每周两次45分钟的疗程,持续8周。结果测量:在基线、干预期4周和8周评估股四头肌力量、星形偏移平衡测试(SEBT)和单腿跳跃测试(SLHT)。结果:除假LL-BFRt组外,LL-BFRt组和HL-Rt组在8周干预期内QS、SEBT、SLHT评分均有显著改善。此外,LL-BFRt显著改善(QS: 9.2-33.5 Newton;SEBT: 1.2-11.1 cm;SLHT: 1.3 ~ 9.8 cm, p值< 0.05)和HL-Rt组(QS: 15.4 ~ 35.9 Newton;SEBT: 2.2-9.0 cm;SLHT: 4.5 ~ 15.8 cm, P < 0.05)。结论:与假LL-BFRt相比,使用LL-BFRt和HL-Rt获得的改善具有可比性,并且能够改善QS、SEBT和SLHT。试验注册:NCT05951036。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of Low-Load Blood Flow Restriction Training and High-Load Resistance Training on Quadriceps Strength, Dynamic Stability, and Functional Performance.

Objective: Blood flow restriction (BFR) is a method used to affix a pneumatic cuff to the uppermost part of a leg. Blood flow restriction is often combined with low load-blood flow restriction training (LL-BFRt) to enhance strength and promote muscle hypertrophy. Therefore, this research aimed to examine the effect of LL-BFRt, sham LL-BFRt, and high load-resistance training (HL-Rt) on quadriceps strength (QS), dynamic stability, and functional performance.

Design: Single-blinded randomized trial method.

Setting: A private physical therapy clinic in Bali, Indonesia.

Participants: Data were collected from 63 basketball and rugby players assigned to 3 intervention groups, namely, LL-BFRt, sham LL-BFRt, and HL-Rt, through block randomization.

Independent variables: Each participant received intervention consisting of 45-minute sessions twice per week for 8 weeks.

Outcome measures: Quadriceps strength, star excursion balance test (SEBT), and single-leg hop test (SLHT) were evaluated in baseline, 4 weeks, and 8 weeks of the intervention period.

Results: In LL-BFRt and HL-Rt groups, QS, SEBT, and SLHT scores were significantly improved during 8-week intervention period, except in sham LL-BFRt group. Furthermore, there was a significant improvement in LL-BFRt (QS: 9.2-33.5 Newton; SEBT: 1.2-11.1 cm; SLHT: 1.3-9.8 cm, P-values < 0.05) and HL-Rt groups (QS: 15.4-35.9 Newton; SEBT: 2.2-9.0 cm; SLHT: 4.5-15.8 cm, P < 0.05) compared with sham LL-BFRt.

Conclusions: The improvements attained by participants using LL-BFRt and HL-Rt were comparable and capable of improving QS, SEBT, and SLHT more than sham LL-BFRt.

Trial registration: NCT05951036.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
7.40%
发文量
185
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine is an international refereed journal published for clinicians with a primary interest in sports medicine practice. The journal publishes original research and reviews covering diagnostics, therapeutics, and rehabilitation in healthy and physically challenged individuals of all ages and levels of sport and exercise participation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信