导管消融治疗老年房颤的结果和对未来当日出院策略的影响。

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Rahin Wahedi, Stephan Willems, Mario Jularic, Jens Hartmann, Omar Anwar, Jannis Dickow, Tim Harloff, Philipp Bengel, Peter Wohlmuth, Andreas Metzner, Nele Gessler, Melanie A. Gunawardene
{"title":"导管消融治疗老年房颤的结果和对未来当日出院策略的影响。","authors":"Rahin Wahedi,&nbsp;Stephan Willems,&nbsp;Mario Jularic,&nbsp;Jens Hartmann,&nbsp;Omar Anwar,&nbsp;Jannis Dickow,&nbsp;Tim Harloff,&nbsp;Philipp Bengel,&nbsp;Peter Wohlmuth,&nbsp;Andreas Metzner,&nbsp;Nele Gessler,&nbsp;Melanie A. Gunawardene","doi":"10.1111/jce.16600","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Catheter ablation (CA) for atrial fibrillation (AF) in the elderly poses a growing challenge. Outcome data regarding CA in these patients are scarce.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Octogenarians with AF or consecutive atrial tachycardia undergoing index or re-ablation (pulmonary vein isolation [PVI] and ablation beyond PVI with different energy sources) in a single center, were analyzed. Study endpoints were efficacy as well as procedural safety. Secondary endpoints included periprocedural complications and predictors for prolonged hospital stay.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>In total, 301 patients (82.1 ± 1.9 years, paroxysmal AF <i>n</i> = 94 [31.2%], CHA<sub>2</sub>DS<sub>2</sub>-VASc-Score 4.2 ± 1.2) undergoing index ablation (<i>n</i> = 172/301, 57.1% [PVI only <i>n</i> = 156/172, radiofrequency <i>n</i> = 92, cryoballoon <i>n</i> = 59, pulsed-field ablation <i>n</i> = 5]) and re-ablation (<i>n</i> = 129/301 [42.9%]) were included. Arrhythmia-free survival at 1 year was 72.6%. Complication rates were low (groin site <i>n</i> = 2/301 [0.7%], tamponade <i>n</i> = 2/301 [0.7%] and stroke <i>n</i> = 1/301 [0.3%]). However concomitant infections (pneumonia <i>n</i> = 5/301 [1.7%], urinary-tract-infections <i>n</i> = 4/301, [1.3%]) and pacemaker-implantation <i>n</i> = 6/301 (2%) occurred more commonly. Hospital stay after CA was 2.3 ± 2 nights. Predictors for prolonged hospitalization were complications (odds ratio: 3.1), infections (odds ratio: 2.1), female sex (odds ratio: 1.15) and frailty assessed by Barthel index (odds ratio: 1.02).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>CA for AF in octogenarians shows low procedural complications and reasonable efficacy. However, concomitant infections and pacemaker implantations occur in this cohort. Due to prolonged hospitalization after CA, especially in female and frail octogenarians, same-day discharge may not be suitable for this specific patient cohort.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15178,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology","volume":"36 4","pages":"832-841"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation in Octogenarians—Outcome and Impact for Future Same Day Discharge Strategies\",\"authors\":\"Rahin Wahedi,&nbsp;Stephan Willems,&nbsp;Mario Jularic,&nbsp;Jens Hartmann,&nbsp;Omar Anwar,&nbsp;Jannis Dickow,&nbsp;Tim Harloff,&nbsp;Philipp Bengel,&nbsp;Peter Wohlmuth,&nbsp;Andreas Metzner,&nbsp;Nele Gessler,&nbsp;Melanie A. Gunawardene\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jce.16600\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Catheter ablation (CA) for atrial fibrillation (AF) in the elderly poses a growing challenge. Outcome data regarding CA in these patients are scarce.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Octogenarians with AF or consecutive atrial tachycardia undergoing index or re-ablation (pulmonary vein isolation [PVI] and ablation beyond PVI with different energy sources) in a single center, were analyzed. Study endpoints were efficacy as well as procedural safety. Secondary endpoints included periprocedural complications and predictors for prolonged hospital stay.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>In total, 301 patients (82.1 ± 1.9 years, paroxysmal AF <i>n</i> = 94 [31.2%], CHA<sub>2</sub>DS<sub>2</sub>-VASc-Score 4.2 ± 1.2) undergoing index ablation (<i>n</i> = 172/301, 57.1% [PVI only <i>n</i> = 156/172, radiofrequency <i>n</i> = 92, cryoballoon <i>n</i> = 59, pulsed-field ablation <i>n</i> = 5]) and re-ablation (<i>n</i> = 129/301 [42.9%]) were included. Arrhythmia-free survival at 1 year was 72.6%. Complication rates were low (groin site <i>n</i> = 2/301 [0.7%], tamponade <i>n</i> = 2/301 [0.7%] and stroke <i>n</i> = 1/301 [0.3%]). However concomitant infections (pneumonia <i>n</i> = 5/301 [1.7%], urinary-tract-infections <i>n</i> = 4/301, [1.3%]) and pacemaker-implantation <i>n</i> = 6/301 (2%) occurred more commonly. Hospital stay after CA was 2.3 ± 2 nights. Predictors for prolonged hospitalization were complications (odds ratio: 3.1), infections (odds ratio: 2.1), female sex (odds ratio: 1.15) and frailty assessed by Barthel index (odds ratio: 1.02).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>CA for AF in octogenarians shows low procedural complications and reasonable efficacy. However, concomitant infections and pacemaker implantations occur in this cohort. Due to prolonged hospitalization after CA, especially in female and frail octogenarians, same-day discharge may not be suitable for this specific patient cohort.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15178,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology\",\"volume\":\"36 4\",\"pages\":\"832-841\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jce.16600\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jce.16600","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:导管消融(CA)治疗老年心房颤动(AF)面临越来越大的挑战。关于这些患者CA的结局数据很少。方法:对在单一中心进行指数消融或再消融(肺静脉隔离术[PVI]和不同能量来源的PVI以外消融)的80多岁房颤或连续房性心动过速患者进行分析。研究终点是疗效和程序安全性。次要终点包括围手术期并发症和延长住院时间的预测因素。结果:共纳入301例患者(82.1±1.9岁,阵发性房颤94例[31.2%],cha2ds2 - vasc评分4.2±1.2),分别行指数消融(n = 172/301, 57.1%[仅PVI n = 156/172,射频n = 92,冷冻球囊n = 59,脉冲场消融n = 5])和再消融(n = 129/301[42.9%])。1年无心律失常生存率为72.6%。并发症发生率低(腹股沟部位n = 2/301[0.7%],填塞n = 2/301[0.7%],卒中n = 1/301[0.3%])。然而,合并感染(肺炎n = 5/301[1.7%],尿路感染n = 4/301[1.3%])和起搏器植入n = 6/301(2%)更为常见。CA术后住院时间为2.3±2晚。长期住院的预测因素为并发症(优势比为3.1)、感染(优势比为2.1)、女性(优势比为1.15)和Barthel指数评估的虚弱(优势比为1.02)。结论:CA治疗老年房颤手术并发症少,疗效合理。然而,在这一队列中也发生了并发感染和起搏器植入。由于CA术后住院时间较长,尤其是女性和体弱多病的八旬老人,当日出院可能不适合这一特定患者队列。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation in Octogenarians—Outcome and Impact for Future Same Day Discharge Strategies

Background

Catheter ablation (CA) for atrial fibrillation (AF) in the elderly poses a growing challenge. Outcome data regarding CA in these patients are scarce.

Methods

Octogenarians with AF or consecutive atrial tachycardia undergoing index or re-ablation (pulmonary vein isolation [PVI] and ablation beyond PVI with different energy sources) in a single center, were analyzed. Study endpoints were efficacy as well as procedural safety. Secondary endpoints included periprocedural complications and predictors for prolonged hospital stay.

Results

In total, 301 patients (82.1 ± 1.9 years, paroxysmal AF n = 94 [31.2%], CHA2DS2-VASc-Score 4.2 ± 1.2) undergoing index ablation (n = 172/301, 57.1% [PVI only n = 156/172, radiofrequency n = 92, cryoballoon n = 59, pulsed-field ablation n = 5]) and re-ablation (n = 129/301 [42.9%]) were included. Arrhythmia-free survival at 1 year was 72.6%. Complication rates were low (groin site n = 2/301 [0.7%], tamponade n = 2/301 [0.7%] and stroke n = 1/301 [0.3%]). However concomitant infections (pneumonia n = 5/301 [1.7%], urinary-tract-infections n = 4/301, [1.3%]) and pacemaker-implantation n = 6/301 (2%) occurred more commonly. Hospital stay after CA was 2.3 ± 2 nights. Predictors for prolonged hospitalization were complications (odds ratio: 3.1), infections (odds ratio: 2.1), female sex (odds ratio: 1.15) and frailty assessed by Barthel index (odds ratio: 1.02).

Conclusions

CA for AF in octogenarians shows low procedural complications and reasonable efficacy. However, concomitant infections and pacemaker implantations occur in this cohort. Due to prolonged hospitalization after CA, especially in female and frail octogenarians, same-day discharge may not be suitable for this specific patient cohort.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
14.80%
发文量
433
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology (JCE) keeps its readership well informed of the latest developments in the study and management of arrhythmic disorders. Edited by Bradley P. Knight, M.D., and a distinguished international editorial board, JCE is the leading journal devoted to the study of the electrophysiology of the heart.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信