主观知识在用Rata方法描述初榨橄榄油中的作用

IF 1.6 3区 农林科学 Q3 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Natalia Hodos, Andrea Cano, Valeria Berrondo, Adriana Gámbaro
{"title":"主观知识在用Rata方法描述初榨橄榄油中的作用","authors":"Natalia Hodos,&nbsp;Andrea Cano,&nbsp;Valeria Berrondo,&nbsp;Adriana Gámbaro","doi":"10.1111/joss.70011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Traditionally, the sensory characteristics of virgin olive oil (VOO) have been described by descriptive analysis (DA) carried out by panels of trained judges, with limited use of rapid descriptive methods for this product. Additionally, subjective knowledge (SK) helps identify differences in consumers' levels of knowledge and their perception of quality. This study aimed to compare the conventional descriptive characterization of VOO across different commercial qualities and sensory profiles with the description obtained through the Rate-All-That-Apply (RATA) methodology, along with acceptability evaluation from 115 frequent consumers of VOO. A hierarchical cluster analysis allowed consumers to be separated into two groups with different levels of SK. Cluster 1 (<i>n</i> = 62), characterized by lower levels of SK, assigned similar acceptability scores to all samples, indicating an inability to differentiate between the commercial qualities of VOO. Participants in this group did not perceive defects in any of the samples evaluated, nor did they demonstrate a preference for a specific sensory profile. These results indicate that frequent consumption of olive oil does not necessarily correlate with knowledge about the product and its quality. Cluster 2 (<i>n</i> = 57), characterized by higher levels of SK, assigned acceptability scores based on the commercial quality of each oil, showing a preference for the extra VOO sample characterized by flavor intensity, odor, pungency, and bitterness. The use of the RATA methodology with this group of consumers enables us to describe both the positive and negative characteristics of olive oil in a manner comparable to DA.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":17223,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sensory Studies","volume":"40 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Role of Subjective Knowledge in the Description of Virgin Olive Oil Using the Rata Methodology\",\"authors\":\"Natalia Hodos,&nbsp;Andrea Cano,&nbsp;Valeria Berrondo,&nbsp;Adriana Gámbaro\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/joss.70011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>Traditionally, the sensory characteristics of virgin olive oil (VOO) have been described by descriptive analysis (DA) carried out by panels of trained judges, with limited use of rapid descriptive methods for this product. Additionally, subjective knowledge (SK) helps identify differences in consumers' levels of knowledge and their perception of quality. This study aimed to compare the conventional descriptive characterization of VOO across different commercial qualities and sensory profiles with the description obtained through the Rate-All-That-Apply (RATA) methodology, along with acceptability evaluation from 115 frequent consumers of VOO. A hierarchical cluster analysis allowed consumers to be separated into two groups with different levels of SK. Cluster 1 (<i>n</i> = 62), characterized by lower levels of SK, assigned similar acceptability scores to all samples, indicating an inability to differentiate between the commercial qualities of VOO. Participants in this group did not perceive defects in any of the samples evaluated, nor did they demonstrate a preference for a specific sensory profile. These results indicate that frequent consumption of olive oil does not necessarily correlate with knowledge about the product and its quality. Cluster 2 (<i>n</i> = 57), characterized by higher levels of SK, assigned acceptability scores based on the commercial quality of each oil, showing a preference for the extra VOO sample characterized by flavor intensity, odor, pungency, and bitterness. The use of the RATA methodology with this group of consumers enables us to describe both the positive and negative characteristics of olive oil in a manner comparable to DA.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17223,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Sensory Studies\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Sensory Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/joss.70011\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sensory Studies","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/joss.70011","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

传统上,初榨橄榄油(VOO)的感官特征是由训练有素的评委小组进行的描述性分析(DA)来描述的,对该产品使用的快速描述性方法有限。此外,主观知识(SK)有助于识别消费者的知识水平和他们对质量的感知的差异。本研究旨在比较不同商业品质和感官特征下VOO的传统描述性特征与通过Rate-All-That-Apply (RATA)方法获得的描述,以及来自115名VOO频繁消费者的可接受性评估。分层聚类分析允许将消费者分为具有不同SK水平的两组。以SK水平较低为特征的第1组(n = 62)为所有样本分配了相似的可接受性分数,表明无法区分VOO的商业质量。这组参与者没有察觉到任何评估样本的缺陷,也没有表现出对特定感官特征的偏好。这些结果表明,经常食用橄榄油与对产品及其质量的了解并不一定相关。集群2 (n = 57)的特点是SK水平较高,根据每种油的商业质量分配可接受性分数,显示出对以风味强度、气味、辛辣和苦味为特征的额外VOO样品的偏好。在这组消费者中使用RATA方法使我们能够以与DA相当的方式描述橄榄油的积极和消极特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Role of Subjective Knowledge in the Description of Virgin Olive Oil Using the Rata Methodology

Traditionally, the sensory characteristics of virgin olive oil (VOO) have been described by descriptive analysis (DA) carried out by panels of trained judges, with limited use of rapid descriptive methods for this product. Additionally, subjective knowledge (SK) helps identify differences in consumers' levels of knowledge and their perception of quality. This study aimed to compare the conventional descriptive characterization of VOO across different commercial qualities and sensory profiles with the description obtained through the Rate-All-That-Apply (RATA) methodology, along with acceptability evaluation from 115 frequent consumers of VOO. A hierarchical cluster analysis allowed consumers to be separated into two groups with different levels of SK. Cluster 1 (n = 62), characterized by lower levels of SK, assigned similar acceptability scores to all samples, indicating an inability to differentiate between the commercial qualities of VOO. Participants in this group did not perceive defects in any of the samples evaluated, nor did they demonstrate a preference for a specific sensory profile. These results indicate that frequent consumption of olive oil does not necessarily correlate with knowledge about the product and its quality. Cluster 2 (n = 57), characterized by higher levels of SK, assigned acceptability scores based on the commercial quality of each oil, showing a preference for the extra VOO sample characterized by flavor intensity, odor, pungency, and bitterness. The use of the RATA methodology with this group of consumers enables us to describe both the positive and negative characteristics of olive oil in a manner comparable to DA.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Sensory Studies
Journal of Sensory Studies 工程技术-食品科技
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
20.00%
发文量
71
审稿时长
18-36 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Sensory Studies publishes original research and review articles, as well as expository and tutorial papers focusing on observational and experimental studies that lead to development and application of sensory and consumer (including behavior) methods to products such as food and beverage, medical, agricultural, biological, pharmaceutical, cosmetics, or other materials; information such as marketing and consumer information; or improvement of services based on sensory methods. All papers should show some advancement of sensory science in terms of methods. The journal does NOT publish papers that focus primarily on the application of standard sensory techniques to experimental variations in products unless the authors can show a unique application of sensory in an unusual way or in a new product category where sensory methods usually have not been applied.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信