对药物使用和精神障碍高密度基因组进行全基因组测序:会议报告

IF 2.4 4区 心理学 Q2 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Shirley Y. Hill, Howard J. Edenberg, Aiden Corvin, Thorgeir Thorgeirsson, Jennifer E. Below, David Goldman, Suzanne Leal, Laura Almasy, Nancy J. Cox, Mark Daly, Benjamin Neale, Scott Vrieze, Huda Zoghbi
{"title":"对药物使用和精神障碍高密度基因组进行全基因组测序:会议报告","authors":"Shirley Y. Hill,&nbsp;Howard J. Edenberg,&nbsp;Aiden Corvin,&nbsp;Thorgeir Thorgeirsson,&nbsp;Jennifer E. Below,&nbsp;David Goldman,&nbsp;Suzanne Leal,&nbsp;Laura Almasy,&nbsp;Nancy J. Cox,&nbsp;Mark Daly,&nbsp;Benjamin Neale,&nbsp;Scott Vrieze,&nbsp;Huda Zoghbi","doi":"10.1111/gbb.70017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The National Institute of Drug Abuse convened a panel of scientists with expertise in substance use disorders (SUD) and genetic methodologies primarily to determine the feasibility of performing whole genome sequencing utilizing existing pedigree collections with a high density of SUD and psychiatric disorders. A major focus was on determining if there had been any successes in identifying genetic variants for complex traits in family-based designs. Such information could provide assurance that whole genome sequencing might provide significant pay-offs particularly in the pursuit of rare variants and copy number variants. An important goal was to discuss and evaluate optimal strategies for studying genetic variants in human samples. Specific topics were (a) to consider whether a smaller number of cases typically available in family studies versus the larger number available in biobanks can reveal unique information; (b) to identify potential gaps in information available in biobank data that might be supplemented with family data; (c) to consider the optimal SUD phenotypic definitions (e.g., quantity of use, problem-oriented) and data collection instruments (self-report or clinician administered) that are both practical and efficient to collect, and likely to provide important insights concerning prevention, intervention, and medication development. Conclusions reached by the panel included optimism about the successes that have occurred in the existing family studies ascertained to include densely affected pedigrees. Evaluation of methodologies led, overall, to a panel consensus that steps should be taken to utilize biobank collection in conjunction with family-based investigations for optimal variant discovery.</p>","PeriodicalId":50426,"journal":{"name":"Genes Brain and Behavior","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gbb.70017","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Whole Genome Sequencing of Pedigrees With High Density of Substance Use and Psychiatric Disorders: A Meeting Report\",\"authors\":\"Shirley Y. Hill,&nbsp;Howard J. Edenberg,&nbsp;Aiden Corvin,&nbsp;Thorgeir Thorgeirsson,&nbsp;Jennifer E. Below,&nbsp;David Goldman,&nbsp;Suzanne Leal,&nbsp;Laura Almasy,&nbsp;Nancy J. Cox,&nbsp;Mark Daly,&nbsp;Benjamin Neale,&nbsp;Scott Vrieze,&nbsp;Huda Zoghbi\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/gbb.70017\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The National Institute of Drug Abuse convened a panel of scientists with expertise in substance use disorders (SUD) and genetic methodologies primarily to determine the feasibility of performing whole genome sequencing utilizing existing pedigree collections with a high density of SUD and psychiatric disorders. A major focus was on determining if there had been any successes in identifying genetic variants for complex traits in family-based designs. Such information could provide assurance that whole genome sequencing might provide significant pay-offs particularly in the pursuit of rare variants and copy number variants. An important goal was to discuss and evaluate optimal strategies for studying genetic variants in human samples. Specific topics were (a) to consider whether a smaller number of cases typically available in family studies versus the larger number available in biobanks can reveal unique information; (b) to identify potential gaps in information available in biobank data that might be supplemented with family data; (c) to consider the optimal SUD phenotypic definitions (e.g., quantity of use, problem-oriented) and data collection instruments (self-report or clinician administered) that are both practical and efficient to collect, and likely to provide important insights concerning prevention, intervention, and medication development. Conclusions reached by the panel included optimism about the successes that have occurred in the existing family studies ascertained to include densely affected pedigrees. Evaluation of methodologies led, overall, to a panel consensus that steps should be taken to utilize biobank collection in conjunction with family-based investigations for optimal variant discovery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50426,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Genes Brain and Behavior\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gbb.70017\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Genes Brain and Behavior\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gbb.70017\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Genes Brain and Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gbb.70017","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

美国国家药物滥用研究所召集了一组具有物质使用障碍(SUD)和遗传方法专业知识的科学家,主要是为了确定利用现有家谱进行全基因组测序的可行性,这些家谱收集具有高密度的SUD和精神疾病。一个主要的焦点是确定在基于家族的设计中,在识别复杂性状的遗传变异方面是否取得了任何成功。这些信息可以保证全基因组测序可能会带来重大回报,特别是在追求罕见变异和拷贝数变异方面。一个重要的目标是讨论和评估在人类样本中研究遗传变异的最佳策略。具体的主题是:(a)考虑家庭研究中通常可用的较少数量的病例与生物库中可用的大量病例是否可以揭示独特的信息;(b)确定生物库数据中可用信息的潜在差距,这些信息可以用家庭数据加以补充;(c)考虑最佳SUD表型定义(例如,使用数量,问题导向)和数据收集工具(自我报告或临床医生管理),这些工具既实用又有效,并且可能提供有关预防,干预和药物开发的重要见解。专家组得出的结论包括对现有家庭研究中已确定的包括密集影响谱系的成功持乐观态度。总体而言,对方法的评估导致专家组达成共识,认为应采取措施将生物库收集与基于家庭的调查结合起来,以获得最佳的变异发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Whole Genome Sequencing of Pedigrees With High Density of Substance Use and Psychiatric Disorders: A Meeting Report

The National Institute of Drug Abuse convened a panel of scientists with expertise in substance use disorders (SUD) and genetic methodologies primarily to determine the feasibility of performing whole genome sequencing utilizing existing pedigree collections with a high density of SUD and psychiatric disorders. A major focus was on determining if there had been any successes in identifying genetic variants for complex traits in family-based designs. Such information could provide assurance that whole genome sequencing might provide significant pay-offs particularly in the pursuit of rare variants and copy number variants. An important goal was to discuss and evaluate optimal strategies for studying genetic variants in human samples. Specific topics were (a) to consider whether a smaller number of cases typically available in family studies versus the larger number available in biobanks can reveal unique information; (b) to identify potential gaps in information available in biobank data that might be supplemented with family data; (c) to consider the optimal SUD phenotypic definitions (e.g., quantity of use, problem-oriented) and data collection instruments (self-report or clinician administered) that are both practical and efficient to collect, and likely to provide important insights concerning prevention, intervention, and medication development. Conclusions reached by the panel included optimism about the successes that have occurred in the existing family studies ascertained to include densely affected pedigrees. Evaluation of methodologies led, overall, to a panel consensus that steps should be taken to utilize biobank collection in conjunction with family-based investigations for optimal variant discovery.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Genes Brain and Behavior
Genes Brain and Behavior 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
4.00%
发文量
62
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Genes, Brain and Behavior was launched in 2002 with the aim of publishing top quality research in behavioral and neural genetics in their broadest sense. The emphasis is on the analysis of the behavioral and neural phenotypes under consideration, the unifying theme being the genetic approach as a tool to increase our understanding of these phenotypes. Genes Brain and Behavior is pleased to offer the following features: 8 issues per year online submissions with first editorial decisions within 3-4 weeks and fast publication at Wiley-Blackwells High visibility through its coverage by PubMed/Medline, Current Contents and other major abstracting and indexing services Inclusion in the Wiley-Blackwell consortial license, extending readership to thousands of international libraries and institutions A large and varied editorial board comprising of international specialists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信