重新评估人工智能服务聊天机器人的个性化:基于少量学习的身份匹配研究

Jan Blömker, Carmen-Maria Albrecht
{"title":"重新评估人工智能服务聊天机器人的个性化:基于少量学习的身份匹配研究","authors":"Jan Blömker,&nbsp;Carmen-Maria Albrecht","doi":"10.1016/j.chbah.2025.100126","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study explores the potential of AI-based few-shot learning in creating distinct service chatbot identities (i.e., based on gender and personality). Further, it examines the impact of customer-chatbot identity congruity on perceived enjoyment, usefulness, ease of use, and future chatbot usage intention. A scenario-based online experiment with a 4 (Chatbot identity: extraverted vs. introverted vs. male vs. female) × 2 (Congruity: matching vs. mismatching) between-subjects design with <em>N</em> = 475 participants was conducted. The results confirmed that customers could distinguish between different chatbot identities created via few-shot learning. Contrary to the initial hypothesis, gender-based personalization led to a stronger future chatbot usage intention than personalization based on personality traits. This finding challenges the assumption that an increased depth of personalization is inherently more effective. Customer-chatbot identity congruity did not significantly impact future chatbot usage intention, questioning existing beliefs about the benefits of identity matching. Perceived enjoyment and perceived usefulness mediated the relationship between chatbot identity and future chatbot usage intention, while perceived ease of use did not. High levels of perceived enjoyment and usefulness were strong predictors for the future chatbot usage intention. Thus, while few-shot learning effectively creates distinct chatbot identities, an increased depth of personalization and identity matching do not significantly influence future chatbot usage intentions. Practitioners should prioritize enhancing perceived enjoyment and usefulness in chatbot interactions to encourage future chatbot use.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100324,"journal":{"name":"Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans","volume":"3 ","pages":"Article 100126"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reevaluating personalization in AI-powered service chatbots: A study on identity matching via few-shot learning\",\"authors\":\"Jan Blömker,&nbsp;Carmen-Maria Albrecht\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.chbah.2025.100126\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study explores the potential of AI-based few-shot learning in creating distinct service chatbot identities (i.e., based on gender and personality). Further, it examines the impact of customer-chatbot identity congruity on perceived enjoyment, usefulness, ease of use, and future chatbot usage intention. A scenario-based online experiment with a 4 (Chatbot identity: extraverted vs. introverted vs. male vs. female) × 2 (Congruity: matching vs. mismatching) between-subjects design with <em>N</em> = 475 participants was conducted. The results confirmed that customers could distinguish between different chatbot identities created via few-shot learning. Contrary to the initial hypothesis, gender-based personalization led to a stronger future chatbot usage intention than personalization based on personality traits. This finding challenges the assumption that an increased depth of personalization is inherently more effective. Customer-chatbot identity congruity did not significantly impact future chatbot usage intention, questioning existing beliefs about the benefits of identity matching. Perceived enjoyment and perceived usefulness mediated the relationship between chatbot identity and future chatbot usage intention, while perceived ease of use did not. High levels of perceived enjoyment and usefulness were strong predictors for the future chatbot usage intention. Thus, while few-shot learning effectively creates distinct chatbot identities, an increased depth of personalization and identity matching do not significantly influence future chatbot usage intentions. Practitioners should prioritize enhancing perceived enjoyment and usefulness in chatbot interactions to encourage future chatbot use.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100324,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans\",\"volume\":\"3 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100126\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949882125000106\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949882125000106","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究探讨了基于人工智能的短时间学习在创建不同服务聊天机器人身份(即基于性别和个性)方面的潜力。此外,它还研究了客户聊天机器人身份一致性对感知享受、有用性、易用性和未来聊天机器人使用意图的影响。采用基于场景的4(聊天机器人身份:外向与内向、男性与女性)× 2(一致性:匹配与不匹配)被试设计在线实验,共475名被试。结果证实,客户可以区分通过几次学习创建的不同聊天机器人身份。与最初的假设相反,基于性别的个性化比基于人格特征的个性化导致了更强的未来聊天机器人使用意愿。这一发现挑战了增加个性化深度本质上更有效的假设。客户-聊天机器人身份一致性并没有显著影响未来聊天机器人的使用意图,这质疑了关于身份匹配好处的现有信念。感知享受和感知有用性在聊天机器人身份与未来聊天机器人使用意图之间的关系中起中介作用,而感知易用性没有中介作用。高水平的感知享受和有用性是未来聊天机器人使用意图的有力预测因素。因此,虽然少射学习有效地创建了不同的聊天机器人身份,但增加的个性化深度和身份匹配并不会显著影响未来聊天机器人的使用意图。从业者应该优先考虑提高聊天机器人交互的感知享受和有用性,以鼓励未来的聊天机器人使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reevaluating personalization in AI-powered service chatbots: A study on identity matching via few-shot learning
This study explores the potential of AI-based few-shot learning in creating distinct service chatbot identities (i.e., based on gender and personality). Further, it examines the impact of customer-chatbot identity congruity on perceived enjoyment, usefulness, ease of use, and future chatbot usage intention. A scenario-based online experiment with a 4 (Chatbot identity: extraverted vs. introverted vs. male vs. female) × 2 (Congruity: matching vs. mismatching) between-subjects design with N = 475 participants was conducted. The results confirmed that customers could distinguish between different chatbot identities created via few-shot learning. Contrary to the initial hypothesis, gender-based personalization led to a stronger future chatbot usage intention than personalization based on personality traits. This finding challenges the assumption that an increased depth of personalization is inherently more effective. Customer-chatbot identity congruity did not significantly impact future chatbot usage intention, questioning existing beliefs about the benefits of identity matching. Perceived enjoyment and perceived usefulness mediated the relationship between chatbot identity and future chatbot usage intention, while perceived ease of use did not. High levels of perceived enjoyment and usefulness were strong predictors for the future chatbot usage intention. Thus, while few-shot learning effectively creates distinct chatbot identities, an increased depth of personalization and identity matching do not significantly influence future chatbot usage intentions. Practitioners should prioritize enhancing perceived enjoyment and usefulness in chatbot interactions to encourage future chatbot use.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信