Allan K. Metz M.D. , Joseph Featherall M.D. , Ameen Z. Khalil M.S. , Reece M. Rosenthal B.S. , Collin D.R. Hunter B.S. , Daniel C. Lewis M.D. , Stephen K. Aoki M.D.
{"title":"磁共振成像上轮匝肌带的大小与髋关节轴向牵张阻力增加无关","authors":"Allan K. Metz M.D. , Joseph Featherall M.D. , Ameen Z. Khalil M.S. , Reece M. Rosenthal B.S. , Collin D.R. Hunter B.S. , Daniel C. Lewis M.D. , Stephen K. Aoki M.D.","doi":"10.1016/j.asmr.2024.100989","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To evaluate the relation between zona orbicularis (ZO) thickness on magnetic resonance imaging and distractibility of the hip in patients undergoing hip arthroscopy.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a retrospective review of primary hip arthroscopy patients treated for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome from December 2021 to September 2022. Prior to arthroscopy, hips were subjected to 100 lb of force (lbf) with fluoroscopic images taken to calculate joint space and overall distraction distance. The ZO was measured on coronal sequences of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging or magnetic resonance arthrography. Multivariable linear regression was performed and controlled for age, sex, body mass index, and lateral center-edge angle.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Sixty-eight patients were included in the final analysis. The mean age was 34.5 ± 12.4 years. The mean joint space at 100-lbf axial traction was 11.0 ± 3.8 mm, and the mean distraction distance was 6.6 ± 3.7 mm. The mean ZO size was 3.2 ± 1.0 mm. Linear regression showed no relation between ZO size and joint space at 100 lbf (β = –0.109, <em>R</em> = 0.107, <em>P</em> = .842). The results of our linear regression analysis also showed no significant association between ZO size and overall distraction distance (β = –0.15, <em>R</em> = 0.108, <em>P</em> = .977).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The results of this study show no significant association between ZO size and resistance to axial traction at the hip joint.</div></div><div><h3>Clinical Relevance</h3><div>Our results suggest that the resistance to axial traction on the hip from the ZO is conferred by its overall integrity and presence—and is not dependent on its size—and that, likely, deviations in other soft-tissue restraints contribute to the spectrum of hip stability experienced by patients.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34631,"journal":{"name":"Arthroscopy Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation","volume":"7 1","pages":"Article 100989"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Larger Zona Orbicularis Size on Magnetic Resonance Imaging Is Not Associated With Increased Resistance to Axial Distraction of the Hip Joint\",\"authors\":\"Allan K. Metz M.D. , Joseph Featherall M.D. , Ameen Z. Khalil M.S. , Reece M. Rosenthal B.S. , Collin D.R. Hunter B.S. , Daniel C. Lewis M.D. , Stephen K. Aoki M.D.\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.asmr.2024.100989\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To evaluate the relation between zona orbicularis (ZO) thickness on magnetic resonance imaging and distractibility of the hip in patients undergoing hip arthroscopy.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a retrospective review of primary hip arthroscopy patients treated for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome from December 2021 to September 2022. Prior to arthroscopy, hips were subjected to 100 lb of force (lbf) with fluoroscopic images taken to calculate joint space and overall distraction distance. The ZO was measured on coronal sequences of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging or magnetic resonance arthrography. Multivariable linear regression was performed and controlled for age, sex, body mass index, and lateral center-edge angle.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Sixty-eight patients were included in the final analysis. The mean age was 34.5 ± 12.4 years. The mean joint space at 100-lbf axial traction was 11.0 ± 3.8 mm, and the mean distraction distance was 6.6 ± 3.7 mm. The mean ZO size was 3.2 ± 1.0 mm. Linear regression showed no relation between ZO size and joint space at 100 lbf (β = –0.109, <em>R</em> = 0.107, <em>P</em> = .842). The results of our linear regression analysis also showed no significant association between ZO size and overall distraction distance (β = –0.15, <em>R</em> = 0.108, <em>P</em> = .977).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The results of this study show no significant association between ZO size and resistance to axial traction at the hip joint.</div></div><div><h3>Clinical Relevance</h3><div>Our results suggest that the resistance to axial traction on the hip from the ZO is conferred by its overall integrity and presence—and is not dependent on its size—and that, likely, deviations in other soft-tissue restraints contribute to the spectrum of hip stability experienced by patients.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34631,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arthroscopy Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"Article 100989\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arthroscopy Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666061X24001263\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthroscopy Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666061X24001263","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的探讨髋关节镜手术患者的核磁共振轮状带(ZO)厚度与髋关节牵伸度的关系。方法回顾性分析了2021年12月至2022年9月期间因股髋臼撞击综合征接受原发性髋关节镜治疗的患者。在关节镜检查之前,髋关节受到100 lb的力(lbf),并拍摄透视图像以计算关节间隙和总牵拉距离。术前磁共振成像或磁共振关节成像冠状位序列测量ZO。对年龄、性别、体重指数和侧中心棱角进行多变量线性回归控制。结果68例患者纳入最终分析。平均年龄34.5±12.4岁。100-lbf轴向牵引时平均关节间隙为11.0±3.8 mm,平均牵张距离为6.6±3.7 mm。平均ZO尺寸为3.2±1.0 mm。线性回归结果显示,100 lbf时ZO尺寸与关节间距无相关性(β = -0.109, R = 0.107, P = .842)。我们的线性回归分析结果也显示,ZO大小与总分心距离无显著相关(β = -0.15, R = 0.108, P = 0.977)。结论本研究结果显示髋关节ZO大小与髋关节轴向牵引阻力无显著相关性。临床相关性我们的研究结果表明,ZO对髋关节轴向牵引的阻力是由其整体完整性和存在决定的,而不是取决于其大小,而且,其他软组织约束的偏差可能有助于患者经历的髋关节稳定性范围。
Larger Zona Orbicularis Size on Magnetic Resonance Imaging Is Not Associated With Increased Resistance to Axial Distraction of the Hip Joint
Purpose
To evaluate the relation between zona orbicularis (ZO) thickness on magnetic resonance imaging and distractibility of the hip in patients undergoing hip arthroscopy.
Methods
We conducted a retrospective review of primary hip arthroscopy patients treated for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome from December 2021 to September 2022. Prior to arthroscopy, hips were subjected to 100 lb of force (lbf) with fluoroscopic images taken to calculate joint space and overall distraction distance. The ZO was measured on coronal sequences of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging or magnetic resonance arthrography. Multivariable linear regression was performed and controlled for age, sex, body mass index, and lateral center-edge angle.
Results
Sixty-eight patients were included in the final analysis. The mean age was 34.5 ± 12.4 years. The mean joint space at 100-lbf axial traction was 11.0 ± 3.8 mm, and the mean distraction distance was 6.6 ± 3.7 mm. The mean ZO size was 3.2 ± 1.0 mm. Linear regression showed no relation between ZO size and joint space at 100 lbf (β = –0.109, R = 0.107, P = .842). The results of our linear regression analysis also showed no significant association between ZO size and overall distraction distance (β = –0.15, R = 0.108, P = .977).
Conclusions
The results of this study show no significant association between ZO size and resistance to axial traction at the hip joint.
Clinical Relevance
Our results suggest that the resistance to axial traction on the hip from the ZO is conferred by its overall integrity and presence—and is not dependent on its size—and that, likely, deviations in other soft-tissue restraints contribute to the spectrum of hip stability experienced by patients.