使用新的BRCA1/BRCA2 ENIGMA轨道集对BRCA1和BRCA2中的VUS进行重新分类,证明了ClinGen ENIGMA专家小组规范优于标准ACMG/AMP分类系统

Anna Benet-Pagès , Andreas Laner , Luis R. Nassar , Tobias Wohlfrom , Verena Steinke-Lange , Maximilian Haeussler , Elke Holinski-Feder
{"title":"使用新的BRCA1/BRCA2 ENIGMA轨道集对BRCA1和BRCA2中的VUS进行重新分类,证明了ClinGen ENIGMA专家小组规范优于标准ACMG/AMP分类系统","authors":"Anna Benet-Pagès ,&nbsp;Andreas Laner ,&nbsp;Luis R. Nassar ,&nbsp;Tobias Wohlfrom ,&nbsp;Verena Steinke-Lange ,&nbsp;Maximilian Haeussler ,&nbsp;Elke Holinski-Feder","doi":"10.1016/j.gimo.2024.101961","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Variants of uncertain significance (VUS) are considered one of the most significant impediments to the translation of genetic test results into precise clinical recommendations. The 2015 American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics/Association for Molecular Pathology (ACMG/AMP) classification guidelines established a general framework for the assessment and classification of genetic variants; yet, gene-specific specifications are needed to enable better variant classification to reduce the number of VUS. The process of gene-specific adaptations of the ACMG/AMP codes is led and accompanied by ClinGen and implemented by Variant Curation Expert Panels (VCEP). The Evidence-based Network for the Interpretation of Germline Mutant Alleles (ENIGMA) VCEP recently published its specifications for the <em>BRCA1</em> (HGNC:1100) and <em>BRCA2</em> (HGNC:1101) genes. We investigated the differences in reclassification between the ENIGMA specifications and the standard ACMG/AMP classification system in a clinical setting.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We reclassified 121 VUS identified in these genes with the latest annotation data using the standard ACMG/AMP classification system and recommendations from the Sequence Variant Interpretation and the ENIGMA specifications. To simplify the reevaluation process, we have created a University of California Santa Cruz Genome Browser track hub that displays the exact data points required for variant classification using the ENIGMA VCEP specifications at the exon and variant level (<span><span>https://genome.ucsc.edu/s/abenet/BRCA.ENIGMA.hg19</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>By comparing the codes used and their different weighting in the 2 approaches, we were able to demonstrate the superiority of the application of ENIGMA VCEP specifications, which resulted in a dramatic reduction of VUS (83.5% ENIGMA VCEP vs 20% ACMG/AMP + Sequence Variant Interpretation).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>For the diagnostic analysis of the <em>BRCA1</em> and <em>BRCA2</em> genes, the use of the ENIGMA VCEP specifications gives the best possible result in the clinical translation of genetic variants. The University of California Santa Cruz Genome Browser <em>BRCA1</em>/<em>BRCA2</em> ENIGMA track set significantly simplified the interpretation process.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100576,"journal":{"name":"Genetics in Medicine Open","volume":"3 ","pages":"Article 101961"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reclassification of VUS in BRCA1 and BRCA2 using the new BRCA1/BRCA2 ENIGMA track set demonstrates the superiority of ClinGen ENIGMA Expert Panel specifications over the standard ACMG/AMP classification system\",\"authors\":\"Anna Benet-Pagès ,&nbsp;Andreas Laner ,&nbsp;Luis R. Nassar ,&nbsp;Tobias Wohlfrom ,&nbsp;Verena Steinke-Lange ,&nbsp;Maximilian Haeussler ,&nbsp;Elke Holinski-Feder\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.gimo.2024.101961\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Variants of uncertain significance (VUS) are considered one of the most significant impediments to the translation of genetic test results into precise clinical recommendations. The 2015 American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics/Association for Molecular Pathology (ACMG/AMP) classification guidelines established a general framework for the assessment and classification of genetic variants; yet, gene-specific specifications are needed to enable better variant classification to reduce the number of VUS. The process of gene-specific adaptations of the ACMG/AMP codes is led and accompanied by ClinGen and implemented by Variant Curation Expert Panels (VCEP). The Evidence-based Network for the Interpretation of Germline Mutant Alleles (ENIGMA) VCEP recently published its specifications for the <em>BRCA1</em> (HGNC:1100) and <em>BRCA2</em> (HGNC:1101) genes. We investigated the differences in reclassification between the ENIGMA specifications and the standard ACMG/AMP classification system in a clinical setting.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We reclassified 121 VUS identified in these genes with the latest annotation data using the standard ACMG/AMP classification system and recommendations from the Sequence Variant Interpretation and the ENIGMA specifications. To simplify the reevaluation process, we have created a University of California Santa Cruz Genome Browser track hub that displays the exact data points required for variant classification using the ENIGMA VCEP specifications at the exon and variant level (<span><span>https://genome.ucsc.edu/s/abenet/BRCA.ENIGMA.hg19</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>By comparing the codes used and their different weighting in the 2 approaches, we were able to demonstrate the superiority of the application of ENIGMA VCEP specifications, which resulted in a dramatic reduction of VUS (83.5% ENIGMA VCEP vs 20% ACMG/AMP + Sequence Variant Interpretation).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>For the diagnostic analysis of the <em>BRCA1</em> and <em>BRCA2</em> genes, the use of the ENIGMA VCEP specifications gives the best possible result in the clinical translation of genetic variants. The University of California Santa Cruz Genome Browser <em>BRCA1</em>/<em>BRCA2</em> ENIGMA track set significantly simplified the interpretation process.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100576,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Genetics in Medicine Open\",\"volume\":\"3 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101961\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Genetics in Medicine Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949774424011075\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Genetics in Medicine Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949774424011075","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的不确定意义变异(VUS)被认为是基因检测结果转化为精确临床建议的最大障碍之一。2015年美国医学遗传学和基因组学学院/分子病理学协会(ACMG/AMP)分类指南建立了遗传变异评估和分类的总体框架;然而,需要基因特异性规范来实现更好的变异分类,以减少VUS的数量。ACMG/AMP编码的基因特异性适应过程由ClinGen领导和陪同,并由变体策展专家小组(VCEP)实施。基于证据的种系突变等位基因解释网络(ENIGMA) VCEP最近发布了BRCA1 (HGNC:1100)和BRCA2 (HGNC:1101)基因规范。我们研究了临床环境中ENIGMA规范和标准ACMG/AMP分类系统在重分类方面的差异。方法利用最新的ACMG/AMP标准分类系统和序列变异解释(Sequence Variant Interpretation)和ENIGMA规范的建议,对这些基因中鉴定出的121个VUS进行重新分类。为了简化重新评估过程,我们创建了加州大学圣克鲁斯基因组浏览器跟踪中心,显示使用ENIGMA VCEP规范在外显子和变体级别进行变体分类所需的确切数据点(https://genome.ucsc.edu/s/abenet/BRCA.ENIGMA.hg19).ResultsBy比较所使用的代码及其在两种方法中的不同权重,我们能够证明ENIGMA VCEP规范应用的优越性。这导致了VUS的显著降低(83.5% ENIGMA VCEP vs 20% ACMG/AMP +序列变异解释)。结论对于BRCA1和BRCA2基因的诊断分析,使用ENIGMA VCEP规范可以在遗传变异的临床翻译中获得最佳结果。加州大学圣克鲁斯分校基因组浏览器BRCA1/BRCA2 ENIGMA轨道集显著简化了解释过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reclassification of VUS in BRCA1 and BRCA2 using the new BRCA1/BRCA2 ENIGMA track set demonstrates the superiority of ClinGen ENIGMA Expert Panel specifications over the standard ACMG/AMP classification system

Purpose

Variants of uncertain significance (VUS) are considered one of the most significant impediments to the translation of genetic test results into precise clinical recommendations. The 2015 American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics/Association for Molecular Pathology (ACMG/AMP) classification guidelines established a general framework for the assessment and classification of genetic variants; yet, gene-specific specifications are needed to enable better variant classification to reduce the number of VUS. The process of gene-specific adaptations of the ACMG/AMP codes is led and accompanied by ClinGen and implemented by Variant Curation Expert Panels (VCEP). The Evidence-based Network for the Interpretation of Germline Mutant Alleles (ENIGMA) VCEP recently published its specifications for the BRCA1 (HGNC:1100) and BRCA2 (HGNC:1101) genes. We investigated the differences in reclassification between the ENIGMA specifications and the standard ACMG/AMP classification system in a clinical setting.

Methods

We reclassified 121 VUS identified in these genes with the latest annotation data using the standard ACMG/AMP classification system and recommendations from the Sequence Variant Interpretation and the ENIGMA specifications. To simplify the reevaluation process, we have created a University of California Santa Cruz Genome Browser track hub that displays the exact data points required for variant classification using the ENIGMA VCEP specifications at the exon and variant level (https://genome.ucsc.edu/s/abenet/BRCA.ENIGMA.hg19).

Results

By comparing the codes used and their different weighting in the 2 approaches, we were able to demonstrate the superiority of the application of ENIGMA VCEP specifications, which resulted in a dramatic reduction of VUS (83.5% ENIGMA VCEP vs 20% ACMG/AMP + Sequence Variant Interpretation).

Conclusion

For the diagnostic analysis of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes, the use of the ENIGMA VCEP specifications gives the best possible result in the clinical translation of genetic variants. The University of California Santa Cruz Genome Browser BRCA1/BRCA2 ENIGMA track set significantly simplified the interpretation process.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信