日本公共保险未完全覆盖的私人长期护理服务的用户概况

IF 1.5 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
JMA journal Pub Date : 2025-01-15 Epub Date: 2024-11-11 DOI:10.31662/jmaj.2024-0164
Kazuhiro Abe, Hiroshi Murayama
{"title":"日本公共保险未完全覆盖的私人长期护理服务的用户概况","authors":"Kazuhiro Abe, Hiroshi Murayama","doi":"10.31662/jmaj.2024-0164","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the characteristics of private long-term care (LTC) service users provided by a company independent from public LTC insurance (LTCI) and to analyze the usage patterns across different types of services.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We utilized data from 8,046 consultations from the administration data of a private LTC service in Suginami Ward, Tokyo, Japan. We focused on older adults enrolled from February 2016 to October 2019 with follow-up until June 2020. The descriptions included users' demographics, LTCI-certified care levels, living situations, and reasons for choosing private LTC services. Furthermore, we examined the frequencies and minutes of each type of service used, such as shopping, meal, cleaning, outing, and social participation assistance, stratified by solitary living and LTCI certification.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 51 older adults, including 35 (69%) women, 28 (55%) solitary living individuals, 23 (45%) public LTCI-certified individuals, and 45 (88%) participants residing in detached houses. The primary motive for private service use was the absence of informal caregiving in 55% of the participants. Cleaning assistance was the most frequently used. Solitary living residents used various types of assistance, not only cleaning, and LTCI-certified individuals more frequently used meal and outing assistance than those without LTCI certification.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings indicate that older adults using private LTC services predominantly lived alone, lived in detached houses, or had no informal care support. Our findings provide an opportunity to examine the appropriateness of the complementary relationship between public and private LTC services.</p>","PeriodicalId":73550,"journal":{"name":"JMA journal","volume":"8 1","pages":"165-173"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11799566/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"User Profiles of Private Long-term Care Services Not Fully Covered by Public Insurance in Japan.\",\"authors\":\"Kazuhiro Abe, Hiroshi Murayama\",\"doi\":\"10.31662/jmaj.2024-0164\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the characteristics of private long-term care (LTC) service users provided by a company independent from public LTC insurance (LTCI) and to analyze the usage patterns across different types of services.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We utilized data from 8,046 consultations from the administration data of a private LTC service in Suginami Ward, Tokyo, Japan. We focused on older adults enrolled from February 2016 to October 2019 with follow-up until June 2020. The descriptions included users' demographics, LTCI-certified care levels, living situations, and reasons for choosing private LTC services. Furthermore, we examined the frequencies and minutes of each type of service used, such as shopping, meal, cleaning, outing, and social participation assistance, stratified by solitary living and LTCI certification.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 51 older adults, including 35 (69%) women, 28 (55%) solitary living individuals, 23 (45%) public LTCI-certified individuals, and 45 (88%) participants residing in detached houses. The primary motive for private service use was the absence of informal caregiving in 55% of the participants. Cleaning assistance was the most frequently used. Solitary living residents used various types of assistance, not only cleaning, and LTCI-certified individuals more frequently used meal and outing assistance than those without LTCI certification.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings indicate that older adults using private LTC services predominantly lived alone, lived in detached houses, or had no informal care support. Our findings provide an opportunity to examine the appropriateness of the complementary relationship between public and private LTC services.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73550,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JMA journal\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"165-173\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11799566/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JMA journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31662/jmaj.2024-0164\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/11 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMA journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31662/jmaj.2024-0164","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在评估一家独立于公共长期护理保险公司(LTCI)提供的私人长期护理(LTC)服务用户的特征,并分析不同类型服务的使用模式。方法:我们利用来自日本东京杉南区一家私人LTC服务管理数据的8046次咨询的数据。我们的研究重点是2016年2月至2019年10月登记的老年人,随访至2020年6月。这些描述包括用户的人口统计数据、ltci认证的护理水平、生活状况以及选择私人LTC服务的原因。此外,我们检查了使用的每种服务的频率和分钟数,如购物、用餐、清洁、郊游和社会参与援助,并根据独居生活和LTCI认证进行分层。结果:该研究包括51名老年人,包括35名(69%)女性,28名(55%)独居者,23名(45%)公共ltci认证者,以及45名(88%)居住在独立住宅的参与者。55%的参与者使用私人服务的主要动机是缺乏非正式的照顾。清洁辅助是最常用的。独居居民使用各种类型的援助,而不仅仅是清洁,LTCI认证的个人比没有LTCI认证的人更频繁地使用膳食和外出援助。结论:这些发现表明,使用私人LTC服务的老年人主要是独居,住在独立的房子里,或者没有非正式的护理支持。我们的研究结果提供了一个机会来检查公共和私人LTC服务之间互补关系的适当性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
User Profiles of Private Long-term Care Services Not Fully Covered by Public Insurance in Japan.

Introduction: This study aimed to evaluate the characteristics of private long-term care (LTC) service users provided by a company independent from public LTC insurance (LTCI) and to analyze the usage patterns across different types of services.

Methods: We utilized data from 8,046 consultations from the administration data of a private LTC service in Suginami Ward, Tokyo, Japan. We focused on older adults enrolled from February 2016 to October 2019 with follow-up until June 2020. The descriptions included users' demographics, LTCI-certified care levels, living situations, and reasons for choosing private LTC services. Furthermore, we examined the frequencies and minutes of each type of service used, such as shopping, meal, cleaning, outing, and social participation assistance, stratified by solitary living and LTCI certification.

Results: The study included 51 older adults, including 35 (69%) women, 28 (55%) solitary living individuals, 23 (45%) public LTCI-certified individuals, and 45 (88%) participants residing in detached houses. The primary motive for private service use was the absence of informal caregiving in 55% of the participants. Cleaning assistance was the most frequently used. Solitary living residents used various types of assistance, not only cleaning, and LTCI-certified individuals more frequently used meal and outing assistance than those without LTCI certification.

Conclusions: These findings indicate that older adults using private LTC services predominantly lived alone, lived in detached houses, or had no informal care support. Our findings provide an opportunity to examine the appropriateness of the complementary relationship between public and private LTC services.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信