开放关节切开术和关节镜手术治疗原发性髋关节滑膜软骨瘤病的结果:倾向评分匹配的比较研究。

IF 4.5 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
American Journal of Sports Medicine Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-09 DOI:10.1177/03635465251316312
Han Soul Kim, Cha Hyeong Ok, Jae Suk Chang, Ji Wan Kim, Chul-Ho Kim
{"title":"开放关节切开术和关节镜手术治疗原发性髋关节滑膜软骨瘤病的结果:倾向评分匹配的比较研究。","authors":"Han Soul Kim, Cha Hyeong Ok, Jae Suk Chang, Ji Wan Kim, Chul-Ho Kim","doi":"10.1177/03635465251316312","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite the widespread use of arthroscopic surgery for hip synovial chondromatosis, its postoperative outcomes remain uncertain. A head-to-head comparison between open arthrotomy and arthroscopic surgery is lacking.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the treatment outcomes of open arthrotomy, particularly with surgical dislocation, and arthroscopic surgery for hip synovial chondromatosis.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All patients who were surgically treated for symptomatic synovial chondromatosis in a tertiary university referral hospital between April 1996 and February 2023 were investigated via 1:1 propensity score matching to compare open arthrotomy and arthroscopic surgery. The primary outcome was chondromatosis recurrence. Secondary outcomes were patient-reported outcome scores, reoperations, and complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 73 patients were enrolled, and after matching, 28 patients in each group were investigated. The mean age and mean follow-up period were 40.5 ± 13.7 years and 4.0 ± 3.1 years, respectively. Clinical and radiological recurrence rates did not differ between groups (clinical recurrence: 7.1% for open arthrotomy vs 25.0% for arthroscopic surgery [<i>P</i> = .143]; radiological recurrence: 14.3% for open arthrotomy vs 32.1% for arthroscopic surgery [<i>P</i> = .205]). However, all patient-reported outcomes at final follow-up were in favor of open arthrotomy compared with arthroscopic surgery (visual analog scale for pain: 1.6 for open arthrotomy vs 3.1 for arthroscopic surgery [<i>P</i> = .002]; quality of life scale: 80.4 for open arthrotomy vs 65.4 for arthroscopic surgery [<i>P</i> < .001]; and modified Harris Hip Score: 84.4 for open arthrotomy vs 75.9 for arthroscopic surgery [<i>P</i> = .001]). The symptom dissatisfaction rate at final follow-up was significantly higher with arthroscopic surgery than with open arthrotomy (35.7% vs 7.1%, respectively; <i>P</i> = .020). There was no difference in reoperation and complication rates between the 2 groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For treating primary synovial chondromatosis, particularly when it is distributed across both the central and peripheral zones, arthroscopic surgery should be chosen with caution, and open arthrotomy with surgical dislocation should be actively considered.</p>","PeriodicalId":55528,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"911-920"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcomes of Open Arthrotomy and Arthroscopic Surgery for Primary Synovial Chondromatosis of the Hip: A Comparative Study With Propensity Score Matching.\",\"authors\":\"Han Soul Kim, Cha Hyeong Ok, Jae Suk Chang, Ji Wan Kim, Chul-Ho Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/03635465251316312\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite the widespread use of arthroscopic surgery for hip synovial chondromatosis, its postoperative outcomes remain uncertain. A head-to-head comparison between open arthrotomy and arthroscopic surgery is lacking.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the treatment outcomes of open arthrotomy, particularly with surgical dislocation, and arthroscopic surgery for hip synovial chondromatosis.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All patients who were surgically treated for symptomatic synovial chondromatosis in a tertiary university referral hospital between April 1996 and February 2023 were investigated via 1:1 propensity score matching to compare open arthrotomy and arthroscopic surgery. The primary outcome was chondromatosis recurrence. Secondary outcomes were patient-reported outcome scores, reoperations, and complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 73 patients were enrolled, and after matching, 28 patients in each group were investigated. The mean age and mean follow-up period were 40.5 ± 13.7 years and 4.0 ± 3.1 years, respectively. Clinical and radiological recurrence rates did not differ between groups (clinical recurrence: 7.1% for open arthrotomy vs 25.0% for arthroscopic surgery [<i>P</i> = .143]; radiological recurrence: 14.3% for open arthrotomy vs 32.1% for arthroscopic surgery [<i>P</i> = .205]). However, all patient-reported outcomes at final follow-up were in favor of open arthrotomy compared with arthroscopic surgery (visual analog scale for pain: 1.6 for open arthrotomy vs 3.1 for arthroscopic surgery [<i>P</i> = .002]; quality of life scale: 80.4 for open arthrotomy vs 65.4 for arthroscopic surgery [<i>P</i> < .001]; and modified Harris Hip Score: 84.4 for open arthrotomy vs 75.9 for arthroscopic surgery [<i>P</i> = .001]). The symptom dissatisfaction rate at final follow-up was significantly higher with arthroscopic surgery than with open arthrotomy (35.7% vs 7.1%, respectively; <i>P</i> = .020). There was no difference in reoperation and complication rates between the 2 groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For treating primary synovial chondromatosis, particularly when it is distributed across both the central and peripheral zones, arthroscopic surgery should be chosen with caution, and open arthrotomy with surgical dislocation should be actively considered.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55528,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Sports Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"911-920\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Sports Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465251316312\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/9 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465251316312","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:尽管关节镜手术广泛应用于髋关节滑膜软骨瘤病,但其术后结果仍不确定。开放性关节切开术和关节镜手术之间的比较缺乏。目的:比较开放关节切开术,特别是手术脱位和关节镜手术治疗髋关节滑膜软骨瘤病的疗效。研究设计:队列研究;证据水平,3。方法:对1996年4月至2023年2月在某三级大学转诊医院接受手术治疗的所有症状性滑膜软骨瘤病患者进行1:1倾向评分匹配,比较开放关节切开术和关节镜手术。主要结局是软骨瘤病复发。次要结局是患者报告的结局评分、再手术和并发症。结果:共入组73例患者,经配对后,每组调查28例患者。平均年龄40.5±13.7岁,平均随访时间4.0±3.1岁。两组患者的临床和放射学复发率无差异(临床复发率:切开关节切除术7.1%,关节镜手术25.0% [P = .143];放射学复发率:开放关节切开术14.3%,关节镜手术32.1% [P = .205])。然而,与关节镜手术相比,最终随访时所有患者报告的结果都支持切开关节切开术(疼痛的视觉模拟评分:切开关节切开术1.6分,关节镜手术3.1分[P = .002];生活质量评分:切开关节切开术80.4分,关节镜手术65.4分[P < .001];改良Harris髋关节评分:开放关节切开术为84.4,关节镜手术为75.9 [P = .001])。最终随访时,关节镜手术患者的症状不满意率明显高于开放关节切开术患者(分别为35.7%和7.1%;P = .020)。两组再手术及并发症发生率无差异。结论:原发性滑膜软骨瘤病的治疗,特别是当其分布在中心区和外周区时,应谨慎选择关节镜手术,并积极考虑开放性关节切开术合并手术脱位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Outcomes of Open Arthrotomy and Arthroscopic Surgery for Primary Synovial Chondromatosis of the Hip: A Comparative Study With Propensity Score Matching.

Background: Despite the widespread use of arthroscopic surgery for hip synovial chondromatosis, its postoperative outcomes remain uncertain. A head-to-head comparison between open arthrotomy and arthroscopic surgery is lacking.

Purpose: To compare the treatment outcomes of open arthrotomy, particularly with surgical dislocation, and arthroscopic surgery for hip synovial chondromatosis.

Study design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods: All patients who were surgically treated for symptomatic synovial chondromatosis in a tertiary university referral hospital between April 1996 and February 2023 were investigated via 1:1 propensity score matching to compare open arthrotomy and arthroscopic surgery. The primary outcome was chondromatosis recurrence. Secondary outcomes were patient-reported outcome scores, reoperations, and complications.

Results: A total of 73 patients were enrolled, and after matching, 28 patients in each group were investigated. The mean age and mean follow-up period were 40.5 ± 13.7 years and 4.0 ± 3.1 years, respectively. Clinical and radiological recurrence rates did not differ between groups (clinical recurrence: 7.1% for open arthrotomy vs 25.0% for arthroscopic surgery [P = .143]; radiological recurrence: 14.3% for open arthrotomy vs 32.1% for arthroscopic surgery [P = .205]). However, all patient-reported outcomes at final follow-up were in favor of open arthrotomy compared with arthroscopic surgery (visual analog scale for pain: 1.6 for open arthrotomy vs 3.1 for arthroscopic surgery [P = .002]; quality of life scale: 80.4 for open arthrotomy vs 65.4 for arthroscopic surgery [P < .001]; and modified Harris Hip Score: 84.4 for open arthrotomy vs 75.9 for arthroscopic surgery [P = .001]). The symptom dissatisfaction rate at final follow-up was significantly higher with arthroscopic surgery than with open arthrotomy (35.7% vs 7.1%, respectively; P = .020). There was no difference in reoperation and complication rates between the 2 groups.

Conclusion: For treating primary synovial chondromatosis, particularly when it is distributed across both the central and peripheral zones, arthroscopic surgery should be chosen with caution, and open arthrotomy with surgical dislocation should be actively considered.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
425
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: An invaluable resource for the orthopaedic sports medicine community, _The American Journal of Sports Medicine_ is a peer-reviewed scientific journal, first published in 1972. It is the official publication of the [American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine (AOSSM)](http://www.sportsmed.org/)! The journal acts as an important forum for independent orthopaedic sports medicine research and education, allowing clinical practitioners the ability to make decisions based on sound scientific information. This journal is a must-read for: * Orthopaedic Surgeons and Specialists * Sports Medicine Physicians * Physiatrists * Athletic Trainers * Team Physicians * And Physical Therapists
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信