手部手术患者对人工智能的认知:对511例手部手术门诊患者的调查

IF 2.1 2区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Sebastian D Arango, Jason C Flynn, Jacob Zeitlin, Samuel H Payne, Andrew J Miller, Tristan B Weir
{"title":"手部手术患者对人工智能的认知:对511例手部手术门诊患者的调查","authors":"Sebastian D Arango, Jason C Flynn, Jacob Zeitlin, Samuel H Payne, Andrew J Miller, Tristan B Weir","doi":"10.1016/j.jhsa.2025.01.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate patient awareness and perceptions of artificial intelligence (AI) chatbots in a hand surgery clinic setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 16-question, multiple-choice, paper survey was administered to adult patients at five urban and suburban hand clinic locations from February to March 2024. The anonymous survey assessed patient characteristics and patient familiarity, usage, and trust toward chatbots in hand surgery. Descriptive statistics summarized the survey results, whereas multivariable logistic regression analyses determined the factors associated with positive perceptions of AI.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 564 surveys administered, 511 (91%) were completed in their entirety and were included in the study. Most patients (81%) reported having at least basic familiarity with computers and smartphones, whereas 45% had never heard of specific AI chatbots (eg, ChatGPT). Only 3.9% of patients frequently use chatbots in daily life, whereas 70% have never used a chatbot. Only 14.1% of patients stated that they were likely to use chatbots to answer questions about their upper-extremity condition. Similarly, low proportions were likely to trust chatbots to accurately answer questions (14.7%), make a diagnosis (9.0%), make appropriate treatment recommendations (11.9%), and help manage complications (10.8%). A greater proportion thought chatbots would play an important role in their future upper- extremity care (18.6%). Positive perceptions of chatbots were associated with uninsured payment status and those with a college degree, whereas patients who were older or who had greater familiarity with technology were less likely to have positive perceptions of chatbots.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>As AI is increasingly integrated into medical practice, many hand clinic patients remain unaware of or uncertain about its role in their care.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>Although certain populations had positive attitudes toward chatbots, enhancing patient education about the role and benefits of AI, as well as ensuring transparency, may facilitate its integration into patient care.</p>","PeriodicalId":54815,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand Surgery-American Volume","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patient Perceptions of Artificial Intelligence in Hand Surgery: A Survey of 511 Patients Presenting to a Hand Surgery Clinic.\",\"authors\":\"Sebastian D Arango, Jason C Flynn, Jacob Zeitlin, Samuel H Payne, Andrew J Miller, Tristan B Weir\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jhsa.2025.01.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate patient awareness and perceptions of artificial intelligence (AI) chatbots in a hand surgery clinic setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 16-question, multiple-choice, paper survey was administered to adult patients at five urban and suburban hand clinic locations from February to March 2024. The anonymous survey assessed patient characteristics and patient familiarity, usage, and trust toward chatbots in hand surgery. Descriptive statistics summarized the survey results, whereas multivariable logistic regression analyses determined the factors associated with positive perceptions of AI.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 564 surveys administered, 511 (91%) were completed in their entirety and were included in the study. Most patients (81%) reported having at least basic familiarity with computers and smartphones, whereas 45% had never heard of specific AI chatbots (eg, ChatGPT). Only 3.9% of patients frequently use chatbots in daily life, whereas 70% have never used a chatbot. Only 14.1% of patients stated that they were likely to use chatbots to answer questions about their upper-extremity condition. Similarly, low proportions were likely to trust chatbots to accurately answer questions (14.7%), make a diagnosis (9.0%), make appropriate treatment recommendations (11.9%), and help manage complications (10.8%). A greater proportion thought chatbots would play an important role in their future upper- extremity care (18.6%). Positive perceptions of chatbots were associated with uninsured payment status and those with a college degree, whereas patients who were older or who had greater familiarity with technology were less likely to have positive perceptions of chatbots.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>As AI is increasingly integrated into medical practice, many hand clinic patients remain unaware of or uncertain about its role in their care.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>Although certain populations had positive attitudes toward chatbots, enhancing patient education about the role and benefits of AI, as well as ensuring transparency, may facilitate its integration into patient care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54815,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Hand Surgery-American Volume\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Hand Surgery-American Volume\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2025.01.004\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hand Surgery-American Volume","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2025.01.004","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在评估在手外科诊所环境中患者对人工智能(AI)聊天机器人的认知和感知。方法:对2024年2月至3月在5个城市和郊区手科诊所就诊的成年患者进行16题选择问卷调查。这项匿名调查评估了患者的特征以及患者对手部手术中聊天机器人的熟悉程度、使用情况和信任程度。描述性统计总结了调查结果,而多变量逻辑回归分析确定了与人工智能的积极看法相关的因素。结果:在564份调查中,511份(91%)完整完成并纳入研究。大多数患者(81%)表示至少对电脑和智能手机有基本的了解,而45%的患者从未听说过特定的人工智能聊天机器人(如ChatGPT)。只有3.9%的患者在日常生活中经常使用聊天机器人,而70%的患者从未使用过聊天机器人。只有14.1%的患者表示,他们可能会使用聊天机器人来回答有关上肢状况的问题。同样,相信聊天机器人能够准确回答问题(14.7%)、做出诊断(9.0%)、提出适当的治疗建议(11.9%)和帮助管理并发症(10.8%)的比例也很低。更大比例的人认为聊天机器人将在他们未来的上肢护理中发挥重要作用(18.6%)。对聊天机器人的积极看法与没有保险的支付状况和拥有大学学位的人有关,而年龄较大或对技术更熟悉的患者对聊天机器人的积极看法则不太可能。结论:随着人工智能越来越多地融入医疗实践,许多手部诊所的患者仍然不知道或不确定它在他们的护理中的作用。临床相关性:尽管某些人群对聊天机器人持积极态度,但加强患者对人工智能的作用和好处的教育,以及确保透明度,可能会促进其融入患者护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Patient Perceptions of Artificial Intelligence in Hand Surgery: A Survey of 511 Patients Presenting to a Hand Surgery Clinic.

Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate patient awareness and perceptions of artificial intelligence (AI) chatbots in a hand surgery clinic setting.

Methods: A 16-question, multiple-choice, paper survey was administered to adult patients at five urban and suburban hand clinic locations from February to March 2024. The anonymous survey assessed patient characteristics and patient familiarity, usage, and trust toward chatbots in hand surgery. Descriptive statistics summarized the survey results, whereas multivariable logistic regression analyses determined the factors associated with positive perceptions of AI.

Results: Of the 564 surveys administered, 511 (91%) were completed in their entirety and were included in the study. Most patients (81%) reported having at least basic familiarity with computers and smartphones, whereas 45% had never heard of specific AI chatbots (eg, ChatGPT). Only 3.9% of patients frequently use chatbots in daily life, whereas 70% have never used a chatbot. Only 14.1% of patients stated that they were likely to use chatbots to answer questions about their upper-extremity condition. Similarly, low proportions were likely to trust chatbots to accurately answer questions (14.7%), make a diagnosis (9.0%), make appropriate treatment recommendations (11.9%), and help manage complications (10.8%). A greater proportion thought chatbots would play an important role in their future upper- extremity care (18.6%). Positive perceptions of chatbots were associated with uninsured payment status and those with a college degree, whereas patients who were older or who had greater familiarity with technology were less likely to have positive perceptions of chatbots.

Conclusions: As AI is increasingly integrated into medical practice, many hand clinic patients remain unaware of or uncertain about its role in their care.

Clinical relevance: Although certain populations had positive attitudes toward chatbots, enhancing patient education about the role and benefits of AI, as well as ensuring transparency, may facilitate its integration into patient care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
10.50%
发文量
402
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Hand Surgery publishes original, peer-reviewed articles related to the pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment of diseases and conditions of the upper extremity; these include both clinical and basic science studies, along with case reports. Special features include Review Articles (including Current Concepts and The Hand Surgery Landscape), Reviews of Books and Media, and Letters to the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信