一种改进的细胞核分离方法。

IF 2.5 Q3 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
Biology Methods and Protocols Pub Date : 2025-01-24 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1093/biomethods/bpaf007
Pengfei Li, Jingyao Zhang, Xiaojuan Liu, Zhijuan Wu, Y James Kang, Wenjing Zhang
{"title":"一种改进的细胞核分离方法。","authors":"Pengfei Li, Jingyao Zhang, Xiaojuan Liu, Zhijuan Wu, Y James Kang, Wenjing Zhang","doi":"10.1093/biomethods/bpaf007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Nuclear isolation is crucial for studying gene expression and regulatory mechanisms in eukaryotic cells. This study aimed to improve nuclear isolation and compare the yield, purity, and efficiency of several methods. Human umbilical vein endothelial cells were used to evaluate four different techniques: sucrose centrifugation, a simplified method, homogenization, and the NE-PER kit. For sucrose centrifugation, cells were scraped in Tween buffer, washed with sucrose buffer, and homogenized in a Dounce homogenizer. The pellet was washed with glycerol buffer to isolate the nuclei. In the simplified method, cells were scraped in scraping buffer, washed with sucrose buffer, and the pellet was washed with glycerol buffer to isolate the nuclei. For homogenization, cells were washed with phosphate buffered saline, followed by two washes in extract buffer and lysed with 10 strokes in a Kontes Dounce homogenizer. The NE-PER kit was used according to the manufacturer's protocol. Nuclei isolated by each method were tested by immunoblotting, co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP), and chromatin immunoprecipitation (Ch-IP) assays. The simplified method produced nuclei with fewer organelles and less cytoplasm than those isolated by homogenization or the NE-PER kit. It was similarly effective as sucrose centrifugation but faster. Co-IP and Ch-IP assays confirmed that the simplified method enriched target proteins and DNA fragments. Overall, the simplified method provides a highly pure nuclear sample optimal for downstream applications requiring purified nuclei.</p>","PeriodicalId":36528,"journal":{"name":"Biology Methods and Protocols","volume":"10 1","pages":"bpaf007"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11805344/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An improved cell nuclear isolation method.\",\"authors\":\"Pengfei Li, Jingyao Zhang, Xiaojuan Liu, Zhijuan Wu, Y James Kang, Wenjing Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/biomethods/bpaf007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Nuclear isolation is crucial for studying gene expression and regulatory mechanisms in eukaryotic cells. This study aimed to improve nuclear isolation and compare the yield, purity, and efficiency of several methods. Human umbilical vein endothelial cells were used to evaluate four different techniques: sucrose centrifugation, a simplified method, homogenization, and the NE-PER kit. For sucrose centrifugation, cells were scraped in Tween buffer, washed with sucrose buffer, and homogenized in a Dounce homogenizer. The pellet was washed with glycerol buffer to isolate the nuclei. In the simplified method, cells were scraped in scraping buffer, washed with sucrose buffer, and the pellet was washed with glycerol buffer to isolate the nuclei. For homogenization, cells were washed with phosphate buffered saline, followed by two washes in extract buffer and lysed with 10 strokes in a Kontes Dounce homogenizer. The NE-PER kit was used according to the manufacturer's protocol. Nuclei isolated by each method were tested by immunoblotting, co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP), and chromatin immunoprecipitation (Ch-IP) assays. The simplified method produced nuclei with fewer organelles and less cytoplasm than those isolated by homogenization or the NE-PER kit. It was similarly effective as sucrose centrifugation but faster. Co-IP and Ch-IP assays confirmed that the simplified method enriched target proteins and DNA fragments. Overall, the simplified method provides a highly pure nuclear sample optimal for downstream applications requiring purified nuclei.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36528,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biology Methods and Protocols\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"bpaf007\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11805344/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biology Methods and Protocols\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/biomethods/bpaf007\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biology Methods and Protocols","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/biomethods/bpaf007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

核分离是研究真核细胞基因表达和调控机制的重要手段。本研究旨在改进核分离,并比较几种方法的产率、纯度和效率。人脐静脉内皮细胞被用来评估四种不同的技术:蔗糖离心、简化法、均质化和NE-PER试剂盒。对于蔗糖离心,细胞在Tween缓冲液中刮擦,用蔗糖缓冲液洗涤,并在Dounce匀浆器中匀浆。用甘油缓冲液洗涤颗粒以分离细胞核。在简化的方法中,细胞在刮擦缓冲液中刮擦,用蔗糖缓冲液洗涤,用甘油缓冲液洗涤,分离细胞核。为了匀浆,细胞用磷酸盐缓冲盐水洗涤,然后在提取物缓冲液中洗涤两次,在Kontes Dounce匀浆器中洗涤10次。NE-PER试剂盒按照制造商的方案使用。通过免疫印迹、共免疫沉淀(Co-IP)和染色质免疫沉淀(Ch-IP)试验检测每种方法分离的细胞核。与匀浆法或NE-PER试剂盒相比,简化法得到的细胞核细胞器和细胞质较少。它与蔗糖离心同样有效,但速度更快。Co-IP和Ch-IP实验证实,简化方法富集了目标蛋白和DNA片段。总的来说,简化的方法提供了一个高纯度的核样品,最适合下游应用需要纯化的核。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An improved cell nuclear isolation method.

Nuclear isolation is crucial for studying gene expression and regulatory mechanisms in eukaryotic cells. This study aimed to improve nuclear isolation and compare the yield, purity, and efficiency of several methods. Human umbilical vein endothelial cells were used to evaluate four different techniques: sucrose centrifugation, a simplified method, homogenization, and the NE-PER kit. For sucrose centrifugation, cells were scraped in Tween buffer, washed with sucrose buffer, and homogenized in a Dounce homogenizer. The pellet was washed with glycerol buffer to isolate the nuclei. In the simplified method, cells were scraped in scraping buffer, washed with sucrose buffer, and the pellet was washed with glycerol buffer to isolate the nuclei. For homogenization, cells were washed with phosphate buffered saline, followed by two washes in extract buffer and lysed with 10 strokes in a Kontes Dounce homogenizer. The NE-PER kit was used according to the manufacturer's protocol. Nuclei isolated by each method were tested by immunoblotting, co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP), and chromatin immunoprecipitation (Ch-IP) assays. The simplified method produced nuclei with fewer organelles and less cytoplasm than those isolated by homogenization or the NE-PER kit. It was similarly effective as sucrose centrifugation but faster. Co-IP and Ch-IP assays confirmed that the simplified method enriched target proteins and DNA fragments. Overall, the simplified method provides a highly pure nuclear sample optimal for downstream applications requiring purified nuclei.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Biology Methods and Protocols
Biology Methods and Protocols Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Agricultural and Biological Sciences (all)
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
2.80%
发文量
28
审稿时长
19 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信