腹直肌鞘和腹横面阻滞用于腱膜前内窥镜修复:双阻滞是术后疼痛管理的解决方案吗?

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Antonio Toscano, Luca Domenico Bonomo, Paolo Capuano, Luca Cremascoli, Filippo Castelli, Mattia Puppo, Fabrizio Aprà, Alberto Jannaci, Salvatore Cuccomarino
{"title":"腹直肌鞘和腹横面阻滞用于腱膜前内窥镜修复:双阻滞是术后疼痛管理的解决方案吗?","authors":"Antonio Toscano, Luca Domenico Bonomo, Paolo Capuano, Luca Cremascoli, Filippo Castelli, Mattia Puppo, Fabrizio Aprà, Alberto Jannaci, Salvatore Cuccomarino","doi":"10.1097/SLE.0000000000001358","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Diastasis recti abdominis (DRA) is a prevalent postpartum condition characterized by the separation of the rectus abdominis muscles with an interrectal distance >2.5 cm, often leading to symptoms like back pain, constipation, and urinary incontinence. Preaponeurotic endoscopic repair (REPA) is a novel, minimally invasive surgical approach for DRA, offering an alternative to traditional abdominoplasty. Despite its minimally invasive nature, REPA surgery poses significant postoperative pain challenges, typically managed with opioids, which carry numerous side effects.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This retrospective study evaluates the efficacy of combining 2 ultrasound-guided abdominal wall blocks, rectus sheath block (RSB) and transversus abdominis plane block (TAPB), to manage postoperative pain in 55 DRA patients who underwent REPA surgery. We performed lateral TAPB in 28 cases, whereas 27 received an association of TAPB and RSB.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At 6 hours postsurgery, 61% of patients in the TAPB group reported significant pain (Numeric Rating Scale >3), compared with 19% in the TAPB-RSB group ( P = 0.001). The TAPB-RSB group also required fewer analgesic rescue doses ( P = 0.042) and showed earlier recovery, with faster initiation of oral intake and mobility.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The combination of TAPB and RSB significantly reduces opioid consumption, postoperative pain, and the need for rescue analgesia compared with TAPB alone. The dual-block approach, providing a multi-dermatomal sensory block, suggests a promising strategy for improving postoperative pain management in REPA surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":22092,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rectus Sheath and Transversus Abdominis Plane Blocks for Preaponeurotic Endoscopic Repair: Is the Double Block the Solution for Postoperative Pain Management?\",\"authors\":\"Antonio Toscano, Luca Domenico Bonomo, Paolo Capuano, Luca Cremascoli, Filippo Castelli, Mattia Puppo, Fabrizio Aprà, Alberto Jannaci, Salvatore Cuccomarino\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/SLE.0000000000001358\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Diastasis recti abdominis (DRA) is a prevalent postpartum condition characterized by the separation of the rectus abdominis muscles with an interrectal distance >2.5 cm, often leading to symptoms like back pain, constipation, and urinary incontinence. Preaponeurotic endoscopic repair (REPA) is a novel, minimally invasive surgical approach for DRA, offering an alternative to traditional abdominoplasty. Despite its minimally invasive nature, REPA surgery poses significant postoperative pain challenges, typically managed with opioids, which carry numerous side effects.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This retrospective study evaluates the efficacy of combining 2 ultrasound-guided abdominal wall blocks, rectus sheath block (RSB) and transversus abdominis plane block (TAPB), to manage postoperative pain in 55 DRA patients who underwent REPA surgery. We performed lateral TAPB in 28 cases, whereas 27 received an association of TAPB and RSB.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At 6 hours postsurgery, 61% of patients in the TAPB group reported significant pain (Numeric Rating Scale >3), compared with 19% in the TAPB-RSB group ( P = 0.001). The TAPB-RSB group also required fewer analgesic rescue doses ( P = 0.042) and showed earlier recovery, with faster initiation of oral intake and mobility.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The combination of TAPB and RSB significantly reduces opioid consumption, postoperative pain, and the need for rescue analgesia compared with TAPB alone. The dual-block approach, providing a multi-dermatomal sensory block, suggests a promising strategy for improving postoperative pain management in REPA surgery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22092,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/SLE.0000000000001358\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SLE.0000000000001358","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:腹直肌分离(DRA)是一种常见的产后疾病,其特征是腹直肌分离,直肠间距离约2.5 cm,常导致背痛、便秘、尿失禁等症状。腱膜前内窥镜修复(REPA)是一种新颖的、微创的DRA手术方法,为传统的腹部成形术提供了一种选择。尽管REPA手术具有微创性,但它对术后疼痛提出了重大挑战,通常使用阿片类药物进行治疗,而阿片类药物具有许多副作用。材料与方法:本回顾性研究评价超声引导下2种腹壁阻滞,直肌鞘阻滞(RSB)和横腹平面阻滞(TAPB)对55例DRA行REPA手术患者术后疼痛的治疗效果。我们在28例患者中进行了外侧TAPB,而27例患者接受了TAPB和RSB联合治疗。结果:术后6小时,TAPB组61%的患者报告明显疼痛(数值评定量表>.3),而TAPB- rsb组为19% (P = 0.001)。TAPB-RSB组需要更少的镇痛救援剂量(P = 0.042),恢复更早,开始口服和活动更快。结论:与单用TAPB相比,TAPB联合RSB可显著减少阿片类药物的消耗、术后疼痛和抢救性镇痛的需要。双阻滞入路,提供多皮节感觉阻滞,为改善REPA手术术后疼痛管理提出了一个有希望的策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Rectus Sheath and Transversus Abdominis Plane Blocks for Preaponeurotic Endoscopic Repair: Is the Double Block the Solution for Postoperative Pain Management?

Background: Diastasis recti abdominis (DRA) is a prevalent postpartum condition characterized by the separation of the rectus abdominis muscles with an interrectal distance >2.5 cm, often leading to symptoms like back pain, constipation, and urinary incontinence. Preaponeurotic endoscopic repair (REPA) is a novel, minimally invasive surgical approach for DRA, offering an alternative to traditional abdominoplasty. Despite its minimally invasive nature, REPA surgery poses significant postoperative pain challenges, typically managed with opioids, which carry numerous side effects.

Materials and methods: This retrospective study evaluates the efficacy of combining 2 ultrasound-guided abdominal wall blocks, rectus sheath block (RSB) and transversus abdominis plane block (TAPB), to manage postoperative pain in 55 DRA patients who underwent REPA surgery. We performed lateral TAPB in 28 cases, whereas 27 received an association of TAPB and RSB.

Results: At 6 hours postsurgery, 61% of patients in the TAPB group reported significant pain (Numeric Rating Scale >3), compared with 19% in the TAPB-RSB group ( P = 0.001). The TAPB-RSB group also required fewer analgesic rescue doses ( P = 0.042) and showed earlier recovery, with faster initiation of oral intake and mobility.

Conclusion: The combination of TAPB and RSB significantly reduces opioid consumption, postoperative pain, and the need for rescue analgesia compared with TAPB alone. The dual-block approach, providing a multi-dermatomal sensory block, suggests a promising strategy for improving postoperative pain management in REPA surgery.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
10.00%
发文量
103
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Surgical Laparoscopy Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques is a primary source for peer-reviewed, original articles on the newest techniques and applications in operative laparoscopy and endoscopy. Its Editorial Board includes many of the surgeons who pioneered the use of these revolutionary techniques. The journal provides complete, timely, accurate, practical coverage of laparoscopic and endoscopic techniques and procedures; current clinical and basic science research; preoperative and postoperative patient management; complications in laparoscopic and endoscopic surgery; and new developments in instrumentation and technology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信