单一长期护理机构老年人肠道多药耐药菌定植的一年监测。

IF 3.7 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance Pub Date : 2025-02-08 eCollection Date: 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1093/jacamr/dlaf008
Cristina Colmenarejo, Concepción Rodríguez-Jiménez, Francisco Javier Navarro, Ana Belén Mateo, Eva María Pellejero, Rosa María Belda-Moreno, Roberto Ureña-Méndez, Raúl Pérez-Serrano, Soledad Illescas, José Ramón Muñoz-Rodríguez, Rosa Del Campo
{"title":"单一长期护理机构老年人肠道多药耐药菌定植的一年监测。","authors":"Cristina Colmenarejo, Concepción Rodríguez-Jiménez, Francisco Javier Navarro, Ana Belén Mateo, Eva María Pellejero, Rosa María Belda-Moreno, Roberto Ureña-Méndez, Raúl Pérez-Serrano, Soledad Illescas, José Ramón Muñoz-Rodríguez, Rosa Del Campo","doi":"10.1093/jacamr/dlaf008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To monitor the gut colonization by multidrug resistant (MDR) bacteria in residents of a single long-term care facility (LTCF) in relation to their clinical evolution, antibiotic consumption and mortality risk.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a total of 187 voluntarily enrolled residents, five rectal swabs samples were recovered over 1 year. Selective media were used to isolate MDR bacteria. Clinical data related to infections, antibiotic consumption and mortality were recovered. Mortality risk among residents who were MDR colonized and non-colonized was compared by Kaplan-Meier curves.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Globally, 25% of residents have gut colonization by ESBL-producing <i>Escherichia coli</i> with a lack of other pathogens such as <i>Acinetobacter baumannii</i> or <i>Clostridioides difficile</i>. Monitoring of ESBL-producing <i>E. coli</i> colonization for 1 year allowed to us to establish three categories among residents: 48.6% never colonized, 15.5% had a persistent colonization, and the remaining 35.8% presented intermittent colonization. The rates of mortality, infections and antibiotic exposure were comparable among ESBL-producing <i>E. coli</i> colonized and non-colonized residents, except for the intermittent colonization group in which a higher and statistically significant mortality rate was observed. As expected, urinary and respiratory tract infections were the most prevalent infectious pathologies in the LTCF, with amoxicillin/clavulanate and fluoroquinolones being the most prescribed antibiotics. A high percentage of ESBL-producing <i>E. coli</i> (28%), and fluoroquinolone resistance were detected in clinical samples.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The monitoring of gut colonization by MDR microorganisms in a single LTCF for 1 year demonstrated the predominance of ESBL-producing <i>E. coli</i>. Almost half of the residents were resistant to its colonization, whereas in 15.5% of them gut colonization was stable. Incidence of infectious episodes and antibiotic exposure were comparable between colonized and non-colonized subjects, but the group with the highest risk of mortality was that with intermittent colonization by ESBL-producing <i>E. coli</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":14594,"journal":{"name":"JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance","volume":"7 1","pages":"dlaf008"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11806259/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"One-year monitorization of the gut colonization by multidrug resistant bacteria in elderly of a single long-term care facility.\",\"authors\":\"Cristina Colmenarejo, Concepción Rodríguez-Jiménez, Francisco Javier Navarro, Ana Belén Mateo, Eva María Pellejero, Rosa María Belda-Moreno, Roberto Ureña-Méndez, Raúl Pérez-Serrano, Soledad Illescas, José Ramón Muñoz-Rodríguez, Rosa Del Campo\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jacamr/dlaf008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To monitor the gut colonization by multidrug resistant (MDR) bacteria in residents of a single long-term care facility (LTCF) in relation to their clinical evolution, antibiotic consumption and mortality risk.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a total of 187 voluntarily enrolled residents, five rectal swabs samples were recovered over 1 year. Selective media were used to isolate MDR bacteria. Clinical data related to infections, antibiotic consumption and mortality were recovered. Mortality risk among residents who were MDR colonized and non-colonized was compared by Kaplan-Meier curves.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Globally, 25% of residents have gut colonization by ESBL-producing <i>Escherichia coli</i> with a lack of other pathogens such as <i>Acinetobacter baumannii</i> or <i>Clostridioides difficile</i>. Monitoring of ESBL-producing <i>E. coli</i> colonization for 1 year allowed to us to establish three categories among residents: 48.6% never colonized, 15.5% had a persistent colonization, and the remaining 35.8% presented intermittent colonization. The rates of mortality, infections and antibiotic exposure were comparable among ESBL-producing <i>E. coli</i> colonized and non-colonized residents, except for the intermittent colonization group in which a higher and statistically significant mortality rate was observed. As expected, urinary and respiratory tract infections were the most prevalent infectious pathologies in the LTCF, with amoxicillin/clavulanate and fluoroquinolones being the most prescribed antibiotics. A high percentage of ESBL-producing <i>E. coli</i> (28%), and fluoroquinolone resistance were detected in clinical samples.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The monitoring of gut colonization by MDR microorganisms in a single LTCF for 1 year demonstrated the predominance of ESBL-producing <i>E. coli</i>. Almost half of the residents were resistant to its colonization, whereas in 15.5% of them gut colonization was stable. Incidence of infectious episodes and antibiotic exposure were comparable between colonized and non-colonized subjects, but the group with the highest risk of mortality was that with intermittent colonization by ESBL-producing <i>E. coli</i>.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14594,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"dlaf008\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11806259/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jacamr/dlaf008\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jacamr/dlaf008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:监测某长期护理机构(LTCF)住院患者肠道多药耐药菌(MDR)定植与临床演变、抗生素使用和死亡风险的关系。方法:在187名自愿入组的居民中,在1年内回收5份直肠拭子样本。采用选择性培养基分离耐多药细菌。收集了与感染、抗生素使用和死亡率相关的临床数据。用Kaplan-Meier曲线比较耐多药定殖和非定殖居民的死亡风险。结果:在全球范围内,25%的居民肠道定植有产esbl的大肠杆菌,缺乏其他病原体,如鲍曼不动杆菌或艰难梭菌。对产生esbl的大肠杆菌定植1年的监测使我们在居民中建立了三种类型:48.6%从未定植,15.5%持续定植,其余35.8%间歇性定植。在产生esbl的大肠杆菌定植和非定植的居民中,死亡率、感染率和抗生素暴露率是相当的,除了间歇性定植组,观察到更高且具有统计学意义的死亡率。正如预期的那样,尿路和呼吸道感染是LTCF中最常见的感染性疾病,阿莫西林/克拉维酸盐和氟喹诺酮类药物是处方最多的抗生素。在临床样本中检测到高比例的产eslb大肠杆菌(28%)和氟喹诺酮类药物耐药性。结论:对单个LTCF患者1年多耐多药微生物肠道定植的监测表明,产esbl的大肠杆菌占主导地位。近一半的居民对其定植有抵抗力,而15.5%的居民肠道定植稳定。感染事件和抗生素暴露的发生率在定植和未定植的受试者之间具有可比性,但死亡率最高的组是产生esbl的大肠杆菌间歇性定植的组。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
One-year monitorization of the gut colonization by multidrug resistant bacteria in elderly of a single long-term care facility.

Objective: To monitor the gut colonization by multidrug resistant (MDR) bacteria in residents of a single long-term care facility (LTCF) in relation to their clinical evolution, antibiotic consumption and mortality risk.

Methods: In a total of 187 voluntarily enrolled residents, five rectal swabs samples were recovered over 1 year. Selective media were used to isolate MDR bacteria. Clinical data related to infections, antibiotic consumption and mortality were recovered. Mortality risk among residents who were MDR colonized and non-colonized was compared by Kaplan-Meier curves.

Results: Globally, 25% of residents have gut colonization by ESBL-producing Escherichia coli with a lack of other pathogens such as Acinetobacter baumannii or Clostridioides difficile. Monitoring of ESBL-producing E. coli colonization for 1 year allowed to us to establish three categories among residents: 48.6% never colonized, 15.5% had a persistent colonization, and the remaining 35.8% presented intermittent colonization. The rates of mortality, infections and antibiotic exposure were comparable among ESBL-producing E. coli colonized and non-colonized residents, except for the intermittent colonization group in which a higher and statistically significant mortality rate was observed. As expected, urinary and respiratory tract infections were the most prevalent infectious pathologies in the LTCF, with amoxicillin/clavulanate and fluoroquinolones being the most prescribed antibiotics. A high percentage of ESBL-producing E. coli (28%), and fluoroquinolone resistance were detected in clinical samples.

Conclusions: The monitoring of gut colonization by MDR microorganisms in a single LTCF for 1 year demonstrated the predominance of ESBL-producing E. coli. Almost half of the residents were resistant to its colonization, whereas in 15.5% of them gut colonization was stable. Incidence of infectious episodes and antibiotic exposure were comparable between colonized and non-colonized subjects, but the group with the highest risk of mortality was that with intermittent colonization by ESBL-producing E. coli.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信