IF 3.4 4区 生物学 Q2 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
Proteomics Pub Date : 2025-02-09 DOI:10.1002/pmic.202400346
Harald Mischak, Joost P. Schanstra, Antonia Vlahou, Joachim Beige
{"title":"Clinical Proteomics, Quo Vadis?","authors":"Harald Mischak,&nbsp;Joost P. Schanstra,&nbsp;Antonia Vlahou,&nbsp;Joachim Beige","doi":"10.1002/pmic.202400346","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The field of clinical proteomics has seen enormous growth in the past 20 years, with over 40,000 scientific manuscripts published to date. At the same time, actual clinical application of the reported findings is obviously scarce. In this viewpoint article, we discuss the key issues that may be responsible for this apparent lack of success. We conclude that success must not be assessed based on the number of publications, but via the impact on patient management and treatment. We proceed with specific suggestions for potential solutions, which include keeping a strict focus on potential patient benefit. We hope this article can help shape the field, so it can in fact deliver on its realistic promise to bring significant improvement in management and care to patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":224,"journal":{"name":"Proteomics","volume":"25 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/pmic.202400346","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proteomics","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/pmic.202400346","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在过去的20年里,临床蛋白质组学领域取得了巨大的发展,迄今为止已经发表了超过40,000篇科学论文。同时,报告结果的实际临床应用明显不足。在这篇观点文章中,我们将讨论可能导致这种明显缺乏成功的关键问题。我们的结论是,评估成功与否不应基于发表论文的数量,而应通过对患者管理和治疗的影响。我们继续为潜在的解决方案提出具体建议,其中包括严格关注潜在的患者利益。我们希望这篇文章可以帮助塑造这个领域,这样它就可以实现其现实的承诺,为患者的管理和护理带来重大改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Clinical Proteomics, Quo Vadis?

Clinical Proteomics, Quo Vadis?

The field of clinical proteomics has seen enormous growth in the past 20 years, with over 40,000 scientific manuscripts published to date. At the same time, actual clinical application of the reported findings is obviously scarce. In this viewpoint article, we discuss the key issues that may be responsible for this apparent lack of success. We conclude that success must not be assessed based on the number of publications, but via the impact on patient management and treatment. We proceed with specific suggestions for potential solutions, which include keeping a strict focus on potential patient benefit. We hope this article can help shape the field, so it can in fact deliver on its realistic promise to bring significant improvement in management and care to patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Proteomics
Proteomics 生物-生化研究方法
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
5.90%
发文量
193
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: PROTEOMICS is the premier international source for information on all aspects of applications and technologies, including software, in proteomics and other "omics". The journal includes but is not limited to proteomics, genomics, transcriptomics, metabolomics and lipidomics, and systems biology approaches. Papers describing novel applications of proteomics and integration of multi-omics data and approaches are especially welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信