nab-紫杉醇联合或不联合米非司酮治疗晚期三阴性乳腺癌的随机II期试验。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-10 DOI:10.1007/s10549-025-07626-5
Nan Chen, Margarite Matossian, Poornima Saha, Murtuza Rampurwala, Salaija Kamaraju, Olwen Hahn, Frederick M Howard, Gini F Fleming, Jincong Q Freeman, Theodore Karrison, Suzanne Conzen, Rita Nanda, Erica M Stringer-Reasor
{"title":"nab-紫杉醇联合或不联合米非司酮治疗晚期三阴性乳腺癌的随机II期试验。","authors":"Nan Chen, Margarite Matossian, Poornima Saha, Murtuza Rampurwala, Salaija Kamaraju, Olwen Hahn, Frederick M Howard, Gini F Fleming, Jincong Q Freeman, Theodore Karrison, Suzanne Conzen, Rita Nanda, Erica M Stringer-Reasor","doi":"10.1007/s10549-025-07626-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Glucocorticoid receptor (GR) activity may mediate chemoresistance in advanced triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Preclinical studies demonstrate that GR antagonism can augment the effect of taxanes in TNBC models. We hypothesized that pretreatment with mifepristone, a potent GR antagonist, would enhance nab-paclitaxel efficacy in advanced TNBC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This trial was terminated early due to poor accrual. 29 of 64 planned patients were enrolled. Patients were randomized to receive nab-paclitaxel with or without mifepristone; oral mifepristone 300 mg was administered the day prior and day of each dose of nab-paclitaxel. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS); secondary/exploratory endpoints included response rate and correlation of response with GR expression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The addition of mifepristone to nab-paclitaxel did not improve PFS (3.0 m vs 3.0 m, p = 0.687) or overall response rate (23% vs 31.5%) compared to nab-paclitaxel alone. There was a trend towards improved overall survival in the combination group, primarily driven by one long-term responder. Increased rates of grade 3 neutropenia (46% vs 7%) and febrile neutropenia were observed in the combination arm, while other toxicities were similar in both groups. Increased GR expression was not correlated with clinical response in the combination arm.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While there were responders to the combination, the study was underpowered to meet the primary endpoint. Higher rates of neutropenia were observed in the combination, but overall it was well tolerated. Preclinical data in TNBC and clinical data in other malignancies support further investigation of GR modulators. Future studies should incorporate biomarkers to select patients who benefit from GR inhibition.</p>","PeriodicalId":9133,"journal":{"name":"Breast Cancer Research and Treatment","volume":" ","pages":"111-119"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11952973/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A randomized phase II trial of nab-paclitaxel with or without mifepristone for advanced triple-negative breast cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Nan Chen, Margarite Matossian, Poornima Saha, Murtuza Rampurwala, Salaija Kamaraju, Olwen Hahn, Frederick M Howard, Gini F Fleming, Jincong Q Freeman, Theodore Karrison, Suzanne Conzen, Rita Nanda, Erica M Stringer-Reasor\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10549-025-07626-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Glucocorticoid receptor (GR) activity may mediate chemoresistance in advanced triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Preclinical studies demonstrate that GR antagonism can augment the effect of taxanes in TNBC models. We hypothesized that pretreatment with mifepristone, a potent GR antagonist, would enhance nab-paclitaxel efficacy in advanced TNBC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This trial was terminated early due to poor accrual. 29 of 64 planned patients were enrolled. Patients were randomized to receive nab-paclitaxel with or without mifepristone; oral mifepristone 300 mg was administered the day prior and day of each dose of nab-paclitaxel. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS); secondary/exploratory endpoints included response rate and correlation of response with GR expression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The addition of mifepristone to nab-paclitaxel did not improve PFS (3.0 m vs 3.0 m, p = 0.687) or overall response rate (23% vs 31.5%) compared to nab-paclitaxel alone. There was a trend towards improved overall survival in the combination group, primarily driven by one long-term responder. Increased rates of grade 3 neutropenia (46% vs 7%) and febrile neutropenia were observed in the combination arm, while other toxicities were similar in both groups. Increased GR expression was not correlated with clinical response in the combination arm.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While there were responders to the combination, the study was underpowered to meet the primary endpoint. Higher rates of neutropenia were observed in the combination, but overall it was well tolerated. Preclinical data in TNBC and clinical data in other malignancies support further investigation of GR modulators. Future studies should incorporate biomarkers to select patients who benefit from GR inhibition.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9133,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Breast Cancer Research and Treatment\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"111-119\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11952973/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Breast Cancer Research and Treatment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-025-07626-5\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/10 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Breast Cancer Research and Treatment","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-025-07626-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:糖皮质激素受体(GR)活性可能介导晚期三阴性乳腺癌(TNBC)化疗耐药。临床前研究表明,GR拮抗可以增强紫杉烷在TNBC模型中的作用。我们假设米非司酮(一种强效GR拮抗剂)预处理可以增强nab-紫杉醇治疗晚期TNBC的疗效。方法:本试验因收益不佳而提前终止。64名计划患者中有29人入选。患者随机接受nab-紫杉醇联合或不联合米非司酮治疗;口服米非司酮300 mg,分别在nab-紫杉醇的前一天和第一天给药。主要终点是无进展生存期(PFS);次要/探索性终点包括应答率和应答与GR表达的相关性。结果:与单用nab-紫杉醇相比,米非司酮加用nab-紫杉醇并没有改善PFS (3.0 m vs 3.0 m, p = 0.687)或总有效率(23% vs 31.5%)。联合治疗组总体生存率有提高的趋势,主要是由一名长期应答者推动的。在联合用药组中观察到3级中性粒细胞减少(46% vs 7%)和发热性中性粒细胞减少的发生率增加,而两组的其他毒性相似。在联合组中,GR表达增加与临床反应无关。结论:虽然联合用药有应答,但该研究不足以达到主要终点。在联合用药中观察到较高的中性粒细胞减少率,但总体上耐受性良好。TNBC的临床前数据和其他恶性肿瘤的临床数据支持对GR调节剂的进一步研究。未来的研究应纳入生物标志物,以选择受益于GR抑制的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A randomized phase II trial of nab-paclitaxel with or without mifepristone for advanced triple-negative breast cancer.

Purpose: Glucocorticoid receptor (GR) activity may mediate chemoresistance in advanced triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Preclinical studies demonstrate that GR antagonism can augment the effect of taxanes in TNBC models. We hypothesized that pretreatment with mifepristone, a potent GR antagonist, would enhance nab-paclitaxel efficacy in advanced TNBC.

Methods: This trial was terminated early due to poor accrual. 29 of 64 planned patients were enrolled. Patients were randomized to receive nab-paclitaxel with or without mifepristone; oral mifepristone 300 mg was administered the day prior and day of each dose of nab-paclitaxel. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS); secondary/exploratory endpoints included response rate and correlation of response with GR expression.

Results: The addition of mifepristone to nab-paclitaxel did not improve PFS (3.0 m vs 3.0 m, p = 0.687) or overall response rate (23% vs 31.5%) compared to nab-paclitaxel alone. There was a trend towards improved overall survival in the combination group, primarily driven by one long-term responder. Increased rates of grade 3 neutropenia (46% vs 7%) and febrile neutropenia were observed in the combination arm, while other toxicities were similar in both groups. Increased GR expression was not correlated with clinical response in the combination arm.

Conclusions: While there were responders to the combination, the study was underpowered to meet the primary endpoint. Higher rates of neutropenia were observed in the combination, but overall it was well tolerated. Preclinical data in TNBC and clinical data in other malignancies support further investigation of GR modulators. Future studies should incorporate biomarkers to select patients who benefit from GR inhibition.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
2.60%
发文量
342
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment provides the surgeon, radiotherapist, medical oncologist, endocrinologist, epidemiologist, immunologist or cell biologist investigating problems in breast cancer a single forum for communication. The journal creates a "market place" for breast cancer topics which cuts across all the usual lines of disciplines, providing a site for presenting pertinent investigations, and for discussing critical questions relevant to the entire field. It seeks to develop a new focus and new perspectives for all those concerned with breast cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信