关于最佳婴儿喂养定量数据框架的专家意见:在英国进行的一项混合方法德尔菲式研究

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q3 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Rochelle Embling, Rachel Evans, Niamh Mchugh, Anna Kolosowska, Varsha Nagaraj, Rachel Bath
{"title":"关于最佳婴儿喂养定量数据框架的专家意见:在英国进行的一项混合方法德尔菲式研究","authors":"Rochelle Embling,&nbsp;Rachel Evans,&nbsp;Niamh Mchugh,&nbsp;Anna Kolosowska,&nbsp;Varsha Nagaraj,&nbsp;Rachel Bath","doi":"10.1111/jhn.70025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>This study aimed to explore how expert stakeholders involved in research, policy and practice would define an ideal dataset for collecting infant feeding data, to better align efforts to monitor and evaluate breastfeeding across the UK four nations.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methodology</h3>\n \n <p>Using the Delphi method, two phases of consultation were completed with a total of 42 stakeholders. First, qualitative (Round 1) and quantitative (Round 2) surveys were distributed to an interdisciplinary panel of experts, to identify individual-level agreement for key terms and timepoints for data collection relevant to infant age. Second, policy-led stakeholders discussed outcomes from Phase 1, before contributing to a written consultation response for their nation to indicate group-level agreement.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Across Phase 1 surveys, 13 of 15 indicators reached consensus for definitions, and 11 of 13 reached consensus for timepoints. During Phase 2, 5 of 7 indicators reached a level of final agreement. Data collection was suggested to focus on the intention to breastfeed (around birth), and the early initiation of feeding (from birth to 10 days). Monitoring of ‘exclusive’ breastfeeding from 0 to 6 months, ‘any’ breastfeeding from 0 to 24 months, and complementary feeding at 6 and 12 months, were identified as key touchpoints.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Principal Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>To support the feasibility of data reforms across UK nations, these results identify consensus for a shortlist of shared data indicators (see Supplementary Figure 1), highlighting opportunities for data collection that close the gap with international standards, and align with existing monitoring frameworks and healthcare practice.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":54803,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics","volume":"38 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Expert Opinions on an Optimal Infant Feeding Quantitative Data Framework: A Mixed Methods Delphi-Style Study in the UK\",\"authors\":\"Rochelle Embling,&nbsp;Rachel Evans,&nbsp;Niamh Mchugh,&nbsp;Anna Kolosowska,&nbsp;Varsha Nagaraj,&nbsp;Rachel Bath\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jhn.70025\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study aimed to explore how expert stakeholders involved in research, policy and practice would define an ideal dataset for collecting infant feeding data, to better align efforts to monitor and evaluate breastfeeding across the UK four nations.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methodology</h3>\\n \\n <p>Using the Delphi method, two phases of consultation were completed with a total of 42 stakeholders. First, qualitative (Round 1) and quantitative (Round 2) surveys were distributed to an interdisciplinary panel of experts, to identify individual-level agreement for key terms and timepoints for data collection relevant to infant age. Second, policy-led stakeholders discussed outcomes from Phase 1, before contributing to a written consultation response for their nation to indicate group-level agreement.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Across Phase 1 surveys, 13 of 15 indicators reached consensus for definitions, and 11 of 13 reached consensus for timepoints. During Phase 2, 5 of 7 indicators reached a level of final agreement. Data collection was suggested to focus on the intention to breastfeed (around birth), and the early initiation of feeding (from birth to 10 days). Monitoring of ‘exclusive’ breastfeeding from 0 to 6 months, ‘any’ breastfeeding from 0 to 24 months, and complementary feeding at 6 and 12 months, were identified as key touchpoints.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Principal Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>To support the feasibility of data reforms across UK nations, these results identify consensus for a shortlist of shared data indicators (see Supplementary Figure 1), highlighting opportunities for data collection that close the gap with international standards, and align with existing monitoring frameworks and healthcare practice.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54803,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jhn.70025\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jhn.70025","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在探讨参与研究、政策和实践的专家利益相关者如何定义收集婴儿喂养数据的理想数据集,以更好地协调监测和评估英国四个国家的母乳喂养工作。采用德尔菲法,共与42个利益相关者完成了两个阶段的咨询。首先,将定性(第1轮)和定量(第2轮)调查分发给一个跨学科专家小组,以确定个人对与婴儿年龄有关的数据收集的关键术语和时间点的共识。其次,政策导向的利益相关者讨论了第一阶段的成果,然后为他们的国家提交了一份书面咨询回应,以表明集团层面的协议。结果在第一阶段的调查中,15个指标中的13个在定义上达成了共识,13个指标中的11个在时间点上达成了共识。在第二阶段,7项指标中有5项达到了最终一致的程度。建议将数据收集重点放在母乳喂养的意向(出生前后)和早期开始喂养(出生至10天)上。监测0至6个月的“纯”母乳喂养,0至24个月的“任何”母乳喂养,以及6个月和12个月的补充喂养,被确定为关键接触点。为了支持英国各国数据改革的可行性,这些结果确定了共享数据指标的短名单的共识(见补充图1),强调了数据收集的机会,以缩小与国际标准的差距,并与现有的监测框架和医疗保健实践保持一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Expert Opinions on an Optimal Infant Feeding Quantitative Data Framework: A Mixed Methods Delphi-Style Study in the UK

Background

This study aimed to explore how expert stakeholders involved in research, policy and practice would define an ideal dataset for collecting infant feeding data, to better align efforts to monitor and evaluate breastfeeding across the UK four nations.

Methodology

Using the Delphi method, two phases of consultation were completed with a total of 42 stakeholders. First, qualitative (Round 1) and quantitative (Round 2) surveys were distributed to an interdisciplinary panel of experts, to identify individual-level agreement for key terms and timepoints for data collection relevant to infant age. Second, policy-led stakeholders discussed outcomes from Phase 1, before contributing to a written consultation response for their nation to indicate group-level agreement.

Results

Across Phase 1 surveys, 13 of 15 indicators reached consensus for definitions, and 11 of 13 reached consensus for timepoints. During Phase 2, 5 of 7 indicators reached a level of final agreement. Data collection was suggested to focus on the intention to breastfeed (around birth), and the early initiation of feeding (from birth to 10 days). Monitoring of ‘exclusive’ breastfeeding from 0 to 6 months, ‘any’ breastfeeding from 0 to 24 months, and complementary feeding at 6 and 12 months, were identified as key touchpoints.

Principal Conclusions

To support the feasibility of data reforms across UK nations, these results identify consensus for a shortlist of shared data indicators (see Supplementary Figure 1), highlighting opportunities for data collection that close the gap with international standards, and align with existing monitoring frameworks and healthcare practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
15.20%
发文量
133
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics is an international peer-reviewed journal publishing papers in applied nutrition and dietetics. Papers are therefore welcomed on: - Clinical nutrition and the practice of therapeutic dietetics - Clinical and professional guidelines - Public health nutrition and nutritional epidemiology - Dietary surveys and dietary assessment methodology - Health promotion and intervention studies and their effectiveness - Obesity, weight control and body composition - Research on psychological determinants of healthy and unhealthy eating behaviour. Focus can for example be on attitudes, brain correlates of food reward processing, social influences, impulsivity, cognitive control, cognitive processes, dieting, psychological treatments. - Appetite, Food intake and nutritional status - Nutrigenomics and molecular nutrition - The journal does not publish animal research The journal is published in an online-only format. No printed issue of this title will be produced but authors will still be able to order offprints of their own articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信