PyPortOptimization:利用多种预期收益方法、风险模型和优化后配置技术的投资组合优化管道

IF 1.6 Q2 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
MethodsX Pub Date : 2025-02-07 DOI:10.1016/j.mex.2025.103211
Rushikesh Nakhate , Harikrishnan Ramachandran , Amay Mahajan
{"title":"PyPortOptimization:利用多种预期收益方法、风险模型和优化后配置技术的投资组合优化管道","authors":"Rushikesh Nakhate ,&nbsp;Harikrishnan Ramachandran ,&nbsp;Amay Mahajan","doi":"10.1016/j.mex.2025.103211","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper presents PyPortOptimization, an automated portfolio optimization library that incorporates multiple methods for expected returns, risk return modeling, and portfolio optimization. The library offers a flexible and scalable solution for constructing optimized portfolios by supporting various risk-return matrices, covariance and correlation matrices, and optimization methods. Users can customize the pipeline at every step, from data acquisition to post-processing of portfolio weights, using their own methods or selecting from predefined options. Built-in Monte Carlo simulations help assess portfolio robustness, while performance metrics such as return, risk, and Sharpe ratio are calculated to evaluate optimization results.<ul><li><span>•</span><span><div>The study compares various configured methods for each step of the portfolio optimization pipeline, including expected returns, risk-modeling and optimization techniques.</div></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><div>Custom Designed Allocator outperformed. For example, the Proportional Allocator's sharpe ratio of out-performed the expected average.</div></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><div>A caching system was implemented to optimize execution time.</div></span></li></ul></div></div>","PeriodicalId":18446,"journal":{"name":"MethodsX","volume":"14 ","pages":"Article 103211"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PyPortOptimization: A portfolio optimization pipeline leveraging multiple expected return methods, risk models, and post-optimization allocation techniques\",\"authors\":\"Rushikesh Nakhate ,&nbsp;Harikrishnan Ramachandran ,&nbsp;Amay Mahajan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.mex.2025.103211\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This paper presents PyPortOptimization, an automated portfolio optimization library that incorporates multiple methods for expected returns, risk return modeling, and portfolio optimization. The library offers a flexible and scalable solution for constructing optimized portfolios by supporting various risk-return matrices, covariance and correlation matrices, and optimization methods. Users can customize the pipeline at every step, from data acquisition to post-processing of portfolio weights, using their own methods or selecting from predefined options. Built-in Monte Carlo simulations help assess portfolio robustness, while performance metrics such as return, risk, and Sharpe ratio are calculated to evaluate optimization results.<ul><li><span>•</span><span><div>The study compares various configured methods for each step of the portfolio optimization pipeline, including expected returns, risk-modeling and optimization techniques.</div></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><div>Custom Designed Allocator outperformed. For example, the Proportional Allocator's sharpe ratio of out-performed the expected average.</div></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><div>A caching system was implemented to optimize execution time.</div></span></li></ul></div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18446,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"MethodsX\",\"volume\":\"14 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103211\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"MethodsX\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2215016125000585\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MethodsX","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2215016125000585","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

PyPortOptimization: A portfolio optimization pipeline leveraging multiple expected return methods, risk models, and post-optimization allocation techniques

PyPortOptimization: A portfolio optimization pipeline leveraging multiple expected return methods, risk models, and post-optimization allocation techniques
This paper presents PyPortOptimization, an automated portfolio optimization library that incorporates multiple methods for expected returns, risk return modeling, and portfolio optimization. The library offers a flexible and scalable solution for constructing optimized portfolios by supporting various risk-return matrices, covariance and correlation matrices, and optimization methods. Users can customize the pipeline at every step, from data acquisition to post-processing of portfolio weights, using their own methods or selecting from predefined options. Built-in Monte Carlo simulations help assess portfolio robustness, while performance metrics such as return, risk, and Sharpe ratio are calculated to evaluate optimization results.
  • The study compares various configured methods for each step of the portfolio optimization pipeline, including expected returns, risk-modeling and optimization techniques.
  • Custom Designed Allocator outperformed. For example, the Proportional Allocator's sharpe ratio of out-performed the expected average.
  • A caching system was implemented to optimize execution time.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
MethodsX
MethodsX Health Professions-Medical Laboratory Technology
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
5.30%
发文量
314
审稿时长
7 weeks
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信