过程工业生产系统网络安全风险评估与保护策略优化的博弈论方法

IF 3.9 2区 工程技术 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Feilong Zhang , Liangchao Chen , Jianfeng Yang , Pengchao Wang , Jianwen Zhang , Qianlin Wang , Xu Diao , Zhan Dou
{"title":"过程工业生产系统网络安全风险评估与保护策略优化的博弈论方法","authors":"Feilong Zhang ,&nbsp;Liangchao Chen ,&nbsp;Jianfeng Yang ,&nbsp;Pengchao Wang ,&nbsp;Jianwen Zhang ,&nbsp;Qianlin Wang ,&nbsp;Xu Diao ,&nbsp;Zhan Dou","doi":"10.1016/j.compchemeng.2025.109034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In the realm of process plants, the imperative to avert accidental incidents is compounded by the escalating specter of deliberate attacks, predominantly in the form of cyber intrusions. These cyber threats, with their attendant physical risks, are notoriously elusive to quantify, thereby impeding the plants’ ability to adapt swiftly to evolving risk profiles. This paper introduces a game-theoretic framework that translates cyber-assaults on industrial processes into process deviations induced by anomalous control actions, enabling the quantification of risk and the assessment of the cyberattacks’ impact on operational processes. Risk quantification serves as the foundation for the payoffs of both the attackers and the defenders, and it is used to address the probability and severity of incidents through static games characterized by incomplete information. Subsequently, complete information static game theory is employed to calculate the payoffs for both the attacker and the defender. This approach encompasses a spectrum of potential attacks and defenses, yielding optimal economic strategies for the defender across various temporal junctures. Furthermore, a risk tolerance model is integrated to refine the payoff calculation, offering a blueprint for the defender to execute enhanced defensive strategies. The efficacy of the proposed methodology in managing the physical risks emanating from cyberattacks is substantiated through a case study, which scrutinizes a steam stripper and its control system within a catalytic cracking unit.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":286,"journal":{"name":"Computers & Chemical Engineering","volume":"195 ","pages":"Article 109034"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Game-theoretic approach to cybersecurity risk assessment and protective strategy optimization in process industry production systems\",\"authors\":\"Feilong Zhang ,&nbsp;Liangchao Chen ,&nbsp;Jianfeng Yang ,&nbsp;Pengchao Wang ,&nbsp;Jianwen Zhang ,&nbsp;Qianlin Wang ,&nbsp;Xu Diao ,&nbsp;Zhan Dou\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.compchemeng.2025.109034\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>In the realm of process plants, the imperative to avert accidental incidents is compounded by the escalating specter of deliberate attacks, predominantly in the form of cyber intrusions. These cyber threats, with their attendant physical risks, are notoriously elusive to quantify, thereby impeding the plants’ ability to adapt swiftly to evolving risk profiles. This paper introduces a game-theoretic framework that translates cyber-assaults on industrial processes into process deviations induced by anomalous control actions, enabling the quantification of risk and the assessment of the cyberattacks’ impact on operational processes. Risk quantification serves as the foundation for the payoffs of both the attackers and the defenders, and it is used to address the probability and severity of incidents through static games characterized by incomplete information. Subsequently, complete information static game theory is employed to calculate the payoffs for both the attacker and the defender. This approach encompasses a spectrum of potential attacks and defenses, yielding optimal economic strategies for the defender across various temporal junctures. Furthermore, a risk tolerance model is integrated to refine the payoff calculation, offering a blueprint for the defender to execute enhanced defensive strategies. The efficacy of the proposed methodology in managing the physical risks emanating from cyberattacks is substantiated through a case study, which scrutinizes a steam stripper and its control system within a catalytic cracking unit.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":286,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computers & Chemical Engineering\",\"volume\":\"195 \",\"pages\":\"Article 109034\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computers & Chemical Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0098135425000389\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers & Chemical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0098135425000389","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在加工工厂领域,避免意外事件的必要性因蓄意攻击(主要以网络入侵的形式)的幽灵不断升级而变得更加复杂。众所周知,这些网络威胁及其伴随的物理风险难以量化,从而阻碍了工厂迅速适应不断变化的风险状况的能力。本文介绍了一个博弈论框架,该框架将对工业过程的网络攻击转化为由异常控制动作引起的过程偏差,从而能够量化风险并评估网络攻击对操作过程的影响。风险量化是判断攻击者和防御者收益的基础,它被用来通过信息不完全的静态博弈来处理事件的概率和严重性。然后,利用完全信息静态博弈论计算攻击方和防御方的收益。这种方法包含了一系列潜在的攻击和防御,为防御者在不同的时间节点上提供了最佳的经济策略。并结合风险容忍度模型来细化收益计算,为防御方实施强化防御策略提供了蓝图。通过对催化裂化装置内蒸汽提汽器及其控制系统的案例研究,证实了所提出的方法在管理网络攻击产生的物理风险方面的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Game-theoretic approach to cybersecurity risk assessment and protective strategy optimization in process industry production systems
In the realm of process plants, the imperative to avert accidental incidents is compounded by the escalating specter of deliberate attacks, predominantly in the form of cyber intrusions. These cyber threats, with their attendant physical risks, are notoriously elusive to quantify, thereby impeding the plants’ ability to adapt swiftly to evolving risk profiles. This paper introduces a game-theoretic framework that translates cyber-assaults on industrial processes into process deviations induced by anomalous control actions, enabling the quantification of risk and the assessment of the cyberattacks’ impact on operational processes. Risk quantification serves as the foundation for the payoffs of both the attackers and the defenders, and it is used to address the probability and severity of incidents through static games characterized by incomplete information. Subsequently, complete information static game theory is employed to calculate the payoffs for both the attacker and the defender. This approach encompasses a spectrum of potential attacks and defenses, yielding optimal economic strategies for the defender across various temporal junctures. Furthermore, a risk tolerance model is integrated to refine the payoff calculation, offering a blueprint for the defender to execute enhanced defensive strategies. The efficacy of the proposed methodology in managing the physical risks emanating from cyberattacks is substantiated through a case study, which scrutinizes a steam stripper and its control system within a catalytic cracking unit.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Computers & Chemical Engineering
Computers & Chemical Engineering 工程技术-工程:化工
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
14.00%
发文量
374
审稿时长
70 days
期刊介绍: Computers & Chemical Engineering is primarily a journal of record for new developments in the application of computing and systems technology to chemical engineering problems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信