linvoseltamab治疗复发/难治性多发性骨髓瘤的评价。

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q2 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-16 DOI:10.1080/14712598.2025.2465825
Zachary M Avigan, Mohammad A Rattu, Joshua Richter
{"title":"linvoseltamab治疗复发/难治性多发性骨髓瘤的评价。","authors":"Zachary M Avigan, Mohammad A Rattu, Joshua Richter","doi":"10.1080/14712598.2025.2465825","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Bispecific antibody therapies, primarily targeting B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA), have shown remarkable outcomes in the treatment of heavily pretreated patients with multiple myeloma (MM). However, there are no current head-to-head trials informing practice for selection or sequencing of optimal T cell redirection strategies in later lines of therapy. Linvoseltamab is a novel BCMA-targeted bispecific antibody that was recently evaluated in the phase 1/2 LINKER-MM1 trial and is currently pending formal regulatory approval.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>In this drug evaluation, we review efficacy and toxicity profiles of linvoseltamab in the context of currently approved bispecific antibody therapies for MM. Specifically, we highlight differences in dosing strategy, cytokine release syndrome (CRS) kinetics, and indirect efficacy comparisons between trials of linvoseltamab and other bispecific antibodies.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Linvoseltamab has a similar efficacy profile with favorable CRS incidence and time-to-onset compared to other approved bispecific antibodies. Pending final regulatory approval and labeling, further real-world analyses are needed to evaluate its final role in the evolving landscape of T cell redirection therapy for MM.</p>","PeriodicalId":12084,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"221-228"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An evaluation of linvoseltamab for treatment of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.\",\"authors\":\"Zachary M Avigan, Mohammad A Rattu, Joshua Richter\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14712598.2025.2465825\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Bispecific antibody therapies, primarily targeting B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA), have shown remarkable outcomes in the treatment of heavily pretreated patients with multiple myeloma (MM). However, there are no current head-to-head trials informing practice for selection or sequencing of optimal T cell redirection strategies in later lines of therapy. Linvoseltamab is a novel BCMA-targeted bispecific antibody that was recently evaluated in the phase 1/2 LINKER-MM1 trial and is currently pending formal regulatory approval.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>In this drug evaluation, we review efficacy and toxicity profiles of linvoseltamab in the context of currently approved bispecific antibody therapies for MM. Specifically, we highlight differences in dosing strategy, cytokine release syndrome (CRS) kinetics, and indirect efficacy comparisons between trials of linvoseltamab and other bispecific antibodies.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Linvoseltamab has a similar efficacy profile with favorable CRS incidence and time-to-onset compared to other approved bispecific antibodies. Pending final regulatory approval and labeling, further real-world analyses are needed to evaluate its final role in the evolving landscape of T cell redirection therapy for MM.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12084,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"221-228\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14712598.2025.2465825\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/16 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14712598.2025.2465825","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

双特异性抗体疗法,主要针对b细胞成熟抗原(BCMA),在治疗重度预处理的多发性骨髓瘤(MM)患者中显示出显着的结果。然而,目前还没有头对头的试验,为后续治疗中最佳T细胞重定向策略的选择或排序提供实践信息。Linvoseltamab是一种新的bcma靶向双特异性抗体,最近在1/2期LINKER-MM1试验中进行了评估,目前正在等待正式的监管批准。涵盖的领域:在本次药物评估中,我们回顾了linvoseltamab在目前批准的MM双特异性抗体治疗中的疗效和毒性。具体而言,我们强调了linvoseltamab和其他双特异性抗体试验在剂量策略、细胞因子释放综合征(CRS)动力学以及间接疗效比较方面的差异。专家意见:与其他已批准的双特异性抗体相比,Linvoseltamab具有相似的疗效,具有有利的CRS发生率和发病时间。在最终的监管批准和标记之前,需要进一步的实际分析来评估其在MM的T细胞重定向治疗的发展前景中的最终作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An evaluation of linvoseltamab for treatment of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.

Introduction: Bispecific antibody therapies, primarily targeting B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA), have shown remarkable outcomes in the treatment of heavily pretreated patients with multiple myeloma (MM). However, there are no current head-to-head trials informing practice for selection or sequencing of optimal T cell redirection strategies in later lines of therapy. Linvoseltamab is a novel BCMA-targeted bispecific antibody that was recently evaluated in the phase 1/2 LINKER-MM1 trial and is currently pending formal regulatory approval.

Areas covered: In this drug evaluation, we review efficacy and toxicity profiles of linvoseltamab in the context of currently approved bispecific antibody therapies for MM. Specifically, we highlight differences in dosing strategy, cytokine release syndrome (CRS) kinetics, and indirect efficacy comparisons between trials of linvoseltamab and other bispecific antibodies.

Expert opinion: Linvoseltamab has a similar efficacy profile with favorable CRS incidence and time-to-onset compared to other approved bispecific antibodies. Pending final regulatory approval and labeling, further real-world analyses are needed to evaluate its final role in the evolving landscape of T cell redirection therapy for MM.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy
Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy 医学-生物工程与应用微生物
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
96
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy (1471-2598; 1744-7682) is a MEDLINE-indexed, international journal publishing peer-reviewed research across all aspects of biological therapy. Each article is structured to incorporate the author’s own expert opinion on the impact of the topic on research and clinical practice and the scope for future development. The audience consists of scientists and managers in the healthcare and biopharmaceutical industries and others closely involved in the development and application of biological therapies for the treatment of human disease. The journal welcomes: Reviews covering therapeutic antibodies and vaccines, peptides and proteins, gene therapies and gene transfer technologies, cell-based therapies and regenerative medicine Drug evaluations reviewing the clinical data on a particular biological agent Original research papers reporting the results of clinical investigations on biological agents and biotherapeutic-based studies with a strong link to clinical practice Comprehensive coverage in each review is complemented by the unique Expert Collection format and includes the following sections: Expert Opinion – a personal view of the data presented in the article, a discussion on the developments that are likely to be important in the future, and the avenues of research likely to become exciting as further studies yield more detailed results; Article Highlights – an executive summary of the author’s most critical points.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信