氧化铝99.6%,凯夫拉®,铝复合装甲板的性能评价数值研究

IF 0.6 4区 工程技术 Q4 MECHANICS
M. D. Umbharatwala, Manmohan Dass Goel, Gaurav Tiwari, Nikhil Andraskar
{"title":"氧化铝99.6%,凯夫拉®,铝复合装甲板的性能评价数值研究","authors":"M. D. Umbharatwala,&nbsp;Manmohan Dass Goel,&nbsp;Gaurav Tiwari,&nbsp;Nikhil Andraskar","doi":"10.1134/S0025654424605172","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The current study is focused on evaluating the effectiveness of composite armour made from ceramic, fabric and metal, employing various configurations. Additionally, it incorporates Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) analysis to compare the performance of different configurations of composite armour plates having 20 mm thickness against high-velocity hard steel core armour-piercing projectiles, particularly for vehicle armour applications. The ceramic component of the armour comprises hardened alumina (99.6%), Kevlar<sup>®</sup> fabric-based fibre-matrix composites, and an epoxy blend reinforced with carbon nanotubes (CNTs). The design of the armour prioritized maintaining a ceramic tile as the frontal impact surface, complemented by an aluminium (Al 2024-T3) plate and a CNT-reinforced Kevlar<sup>®</sup> composite on the rear. The armour was engineered as a functionally graded composite material with varying levels of hardness and toughness. To ensure equitable comparison across armour plates, the total thickness of the composite was consistently set at 20 mm, and its performance was assessed under two distinct impact velocities: 725 and 550 m/s. A multi-criterion based decision-making (MCDM) approach was employed to comprehensively analyse the armour’s performance across multiple parameters. The study shows that the stacking sequence of the materials significantly alters the ballistic resistance of composite panel despite possessing similar arial density. Also, Certain configurations outperforms others despite having lesser arial density.</p>","PeriodicalId":697,"journal":{"name":"Mechanics of Solids","volume":"59 5","pages":"3068 - 3096"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Numerical Study on Performance Evaluation of Alumina 99.6%, Kevlar®, Aluminium Composite Armour Panels\",\"authors\":\"M. D. Umbharatwala,&nbsp;Manmohan Dass Goel,&nbsp;Gaurav Tiwari,&nbsp;Nikhil Andraskar\",\"doi\":\"10.1134/S0025654424605172\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The current study is focused on evaluating the effectiveness of composite armour made from ceramic, fabric and metal, employing various configurations. Additionally, it incorporates Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) analysis to compare the performance of different configurations of composite armour plates having 20 mm thickness against high-velocity hard steel core armour-piercing projectiles, particularly for vehicle armour applications. The ceramic component of the armour comprises hardened alumina (99.6%), Kevlar<sup>®</sup> fabric-based fibre-matrix composites, and an epoxy blend reinforced with carbon nanotubes (CNTs). The design of the armour prioritized maintaining a ceramic tile as the frontal impact surface, complemented by an aluminium (Al 2024-T3) plate and a CNT-reinforced Kevlar<sup>®</sup> composite on the rear. The armour was engineered as a functionally graded composite material with varying levels of hardness and toughness. To ensure equitable comparison across armour plates, the total thickness of the composite was consistently set at 20 mm, and its performance was assessed under two distinct impact velocities: 725 and 550 m/s. A multi-criterion based decision-making (MCDM) approach was employed to comprehensively analyse the armour’s performance across multiple parameters. The study shows that the stacking sequence of the materials significantly alters the ballistic resistance of composite panel despite possessing similar arial density. Also, Certain configurations outperforms others despite having lesser arial density.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":697,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mechanics of Solids\",\"volume\":\"59 5\",\"pages\":\"3068 - 3096\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mechanics of Solids\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1134/S0025654424605172\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MECHANICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mechanics of Solids","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1134/S0025654424605172","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MECHANICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目前的研究重点是评估由陶瓷、织物和金属制成的复合装甲的有效性,采用不同的配置。此外,它结合了通过理想解决方案相似性(TOPSIS)分析的优先顺序技术,以比较具有20毫米厚度的不同配置的复合装甲板对抗高速硬钢核心穿甲弹的性能,特别是用于车辆装甲应用。装甲的陶瓷成分包括硬化氧化铝(99.6%)、凯夫拉纤维基复合材料和碳纳米管(CNTs)增强的环氧共混物。装甲的设计优先考虑将瓷砖作为正面撞击面,并在后方使用铝(Al 2024-T3)板和cnt增强的凯夫拉®复合材料。装甲被设计成一种具有不同硬度和韧性的功能分级复合材料。为了确保装甲板之间的公平比较,复合材料的总厚度始终设置为20毫米,并在两种不同的冲击速度下评估其性能:725和550米/秒。采用基于多准则的决策(MCDM)方法,跨多个参数对装甲性能进行综合分析。研究表明,材料的堆积顺序对复合材料板的抗弹道性有显著影响,尽管材料的相对密度相似。此外,尽管arial密度较小,但某些配置的性能优于其他配置。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Numerical Study on Performance Evaluation of Alumina 99.6%, Kevlar®, Aluminium Composite Armour Panels

Numerical Study on Performance Evaluation of Alumina 99.6%, Kevlar®, Aluminium Composite Armour Panels

The current study is focused on evaluating the effectiveness of composite armour made from ceramic, fabric and metal, employing various configurations. Additionally, it incorporates Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) analysis to compare the performance of different configurations of composite armour plates having 20 mm thickness against high-velocity hard steel core armour-piercing projectiles, particularly for vehicle armour applications. The ceramic component of the armour comprises hardened alumina (99.6%), Kevlar® fabric-based fibre-matrix composites, and an epoxy blend reinforced with carbon nanotubes (CNTs). The design of the armour prioritized maintaining a ceramic tile as the frontal impact surface, complemented by an aluminium (Al 2024-T3) plate and a CNT-reinforced Kevlar® composite on the rear. The armour was engineered as a functionally graded composite material with varying levels of hardness and toughness. To ensure equitable comparison across armour plates, the total thickness of the composite was consistently set at 20 mm, and its performance was assessed under two distinct impact velocities: 725 and 550 m/s. A multi-criterion based decision-making (MCDM) approach was employed to comprehensively analyse the armour’s performance across multiple parameters. The study shows that the stacking sequence of the materials significantly alters the ballistic resistance of composite panel despite possessing similar arial density. Also, Certain configurations outperforms others despite having lesser arial density.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Mechanics of Solids
Mechanics of Solids 医学-力学
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
42.90%
发文量
112
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Mechanics of Solids publishes articles in the general areas of dynamics of particles and rigid bodies and the mechanics of deformable solids. The journal has a goal of being a comprehensive record of up-to-the-minute research results. The journal coverage is vibration of discrete and continuous systems; stability and optimization of mechanical systems; automatic control theory; dynamics of multiple body systems; elasticity, viscoelasticity and plasticity; mechanics of composite materials; theory of structures and structural stability; wave propagation and impact of solids; fracture mechanics; micromechanics of solids; mechanics of granular and geological materials; structure-fluid interaction; mechanical behavior of materials; gyroscopes and navigation systems; and nanomechanics. Most of the articles in the journal are theoretical and analytical. They present a blend of basic mechanics theory with analysis of contemporary technological problems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信