立体定向体放射治疗原发性肾细胞癌的大型多中心系列研究结果。

IF 8.3 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Ludwige Abancourt, Muhammad Ali, Magali Quivrin, Jennifer Wallet, Ulrike Schick, Gianluca Ingrosso, Stéphane Supiot, Ciro Franzese, Marta Scorsetti, Linda Kerkmeijer, Andrei Fodor, Nadia Di Muzio, Natacha Jousset, Thomas Boisserie, Beatrice Detti, Luca Nicosia, Filippo Alongi, Fabio Trippa, Thomas Leleu, Loïsse Dessoude, Mario Terlizzi, Pierre Blanchard, Nathaniel Scher, Alain Toledano, Jérémy Baude, Éric Lartigau, Maël Barthoulot, Shankar Siva, David Pasquier
{"title":"立体定向体放射治疗原发性肾细胞癌的大型多中心系列研究结果。","authors":"Ludwige Abancourt, Muhammad Ali, Magali Quivrin, Jennifer Wallet, Ulrike Schick, Gianluca Ingrosso, Stéphane Supiot, Ciro Franzese, Marta Scorsetti, Linda Kerkmeijer, Andrei Fodor, Nadia Di Muzio, Natacha Jousset, Thomas Boisserie, Beatrice Detti, Luca Nicosia, Filippo Alongi, Fabio Trippa, Thomas Leleu, Loïsse Dessoude, Mario Terlizzi, Pierre Blanchard, Nathaniel Scher, Alain Toledano, Jérémy Baude, Éric Lartigau, Maël Barthoulot, Shankar Siva, David Pasquier","doi":"10.1016/j.euo.2025.01.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>For inoperable patients, stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is a noninvasive treatment approach for primary renal cell carcinoma (RCC). We aimed to evaluate local control (LC) of primary RCC treated with SBRT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multicenter retrospective study involved 16 centers in Australia, France, Italy, and the Netherlands. The primary endpoint was the LC probability, and the secondary endpoints were progression-free survival, overall survival (OS), cumulative incidence of cancer-related deaths, toxicities, and renal function evolution after SBRT.</p><p><strong>Key findings and limitations: </strong>A total of 144 patients, treated between 2008 and 2020, with a median follow-up of 43 mo (interquartile range [IQR], 24.0-81.2), were included. The median age was 76 yr (IQR, 67.0-82.0) and the median tumor size was 4.4 cm (IQR, 3.3-5.6). The median baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was 60 ml/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup>. Of the patients, 40% had mild to moderate eGFR (30-60 ml/min). The two main treatment regimens were 42 Gy in three fractions and 26 Gy in one fraction. The LC probability was 98% at 1 yr (95% confidence interval [CI], 94-99) and 96% (95% CI, 92-99) at 5 yr. The median OS was 58 mo and the cumulative incidence of cancer-related deaths was 8% (95% CI, 3-15) at 5 yr. Seventy-one patients (49%) experienced at least one toxicity, including grade 1 in the majority (32%), grade 2 (14%), and grade 3 (1%). Two patients (1%) underwent dialysis (grade 4). The median eGFR loss was -7 ml/min (IQR, -17; 0) at the last follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and clinical implications: </strong>This large series of primary RCC treated with SBRT demonstrates excellent LC and renal function preservation, and is associated with an acceptable toxicity profile. SBRT is an alternative treatment for inoperable patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":12256,"journal":{"name":"European urology oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Results of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Primary Renal Cell Carcinoma in a Large Multicenter Series.\",\"authors\":\"Ludwige Abancourt, Muhammad Ali, Magali Quivrin, Jennifer Wallet, Ulrike Schick, Gianluca Ingrosso, Stéphane Supiot, Ciro Franzese, Marta Scorsetti, Linda Kerkmeijer, Andrei Fodor, Nadia Di Muzio, Natacha Jousset, Thomas Boisserie, Beatrice Detti, Luca Nicosia, Filippo Alongi, Fabio Trippa, Thomas Leleu, Loïsse Dessoude, Mario Terlizzi, Pierre Blanchard, Nathaniel Scher, Alain Toledano, Jérémy Baude, Éric Lartigau, Maël Barthoulot, Shankar Siva, David Pasquier\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.euo.2025.01.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>For inoperable patients, stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is a noninvasive treatment approach for primary renal cell carcinoma (RCC). We aimed to evaluate local control (LC) of primary RCC treated with SBRT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multicenter retrospective study involved 16 centers in Australia, France, Italy, and the Netherlands. The primary endpoint was the LC probability, and the secondary endpoints were progression-free survival, overall survival (OS), cumulative incidence of cancer-related deaths, toxicities, and renal function evolution after SBRT.</p><p><strong>Key findings and limitations: </strong>A total of 144 patients, treated between 2008 and 2020, with a median follow-up of 43 mo (interquartile range [IQR], 24.0-81.2), were included. The median age was 76 yr (IQR, 67.0-82.0) and the median tumor size was 4.4 cm (IQR, 3.3-5.6). The median baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was 60 ml/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup>. Of the patients, 40% had mild to moderate eGFR (30-60 ml/min). The two main treatment regimens were 42 Gy in three fractions and 26 Gy in one fraction. The LC probability was 98% at 1 yr (95% confidence interval [CI], 94-99) and 96% (95% CI, 92-99) at 5 yr. The median OS was 58 mo and the cumulative incidence of cancer-related deaths was 8% (95% CI, 3-15) at 5 yr. Seventy-one patients (49%) experienced at least one toxicity, including grade 1 in the majority (32%), grade 2 (14%), and grade 3 (1%). Two patients (1%) underwent dialysis (grade 4). The median eGFR loss was -7 ml/min (IQR, -17; 0) at the last follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and clinical implications: </strong>This large series of primary RCC treated with SBRT demonstrates excellent LC and renal function preservation, and is associated with an acceptable toxicity profile. SBRT is an alternative treatment for inoperable patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12256,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European urology oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European urology oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euo.2025.01.001\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European urology oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euo.2025.01.001","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景与目的:对于不能手术的患者,立体定向全身放射治疗(SBRT)是原发性肾细胞癌(RCC)的一种无创治疗方法。我们的目的是评估SBRT治疗原发性RCC的局部控制(LC)。方法:这项多中心回顾性研究涉及澳大利亚、法国、意大利和荷兰的16个中心。主要终点是LC概率,次要终点是无进展生存期、总生存期(OS)、癌症相关死亡累积发生率、毒性和SBRT后肾功能演变。主要发现和局限性:共纳入144例患者,在2008年至2020年期间接受治疗,中位随访时间为43个月(四分位数间距[IQR], 24.0-81.2)。中位年龄76岁(IQR, 67.0 ~ 82.0),中位肿瘤大小4.4 cm (IQR, 3.3 ~ 5.6)。平均基线估计肾小球滤过率(eGFR)为60 ml/min/1.73 m2。40%的患者有轻度至中度eGFR (30-60 ml/min)。两种主要治疗方案分别为三组42 Gy和一组26 Gy。1年的LC概率为98%(95%置信区间[CI], 94-99), 5年的LC概率为96% (95% CI, 92-99)。5年的中位OS为58个月,癌症相关死亡的累积发生率为8% (95% CI, 3-15)。71名患者(49%)经历了至少一种毒性,包括大多数1级(32%)、2级(14%)和3级(1%)。2名患者(1%)接受了透析(4级)。中位eGFR损失为-7 ml/min (IQR, -17;0)最后一次随访。结论和临床意义:SBRT治疗的这一系列原发性RCC表现出良好的LC和肾功能保存,并且具有可接受的毒性。SBRT是无法手术患者的替代治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Results of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Primary Renal Cell Carcinoma in a Large Multicenter Series.

Background and objective: For inoperable patients, stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is a noninvasive treatment approach for primary renal cell carcinoma (RCC). We aimed to evaluate local control (LC) of primary RCC treated with SBRT.

Methods: This multicenter retrospective study involved 16 centers in Australia, France, Italy, and the Netherlands. The primary endpoint was the LC probability, and the secondary endpoints were progression-free survival, overall survival (OS), cumulative incidence of cancer-related deaths, toxicities, and renal function evolution after SBRT.

Key findings and limitations: A total of 144 patients, treated between 2008 and 2020, with a median follow-up of 43 mo (interquartile range [IQR], 24.0-81.2), were included. The median age was 76 yr (IQR, 67.0-82.0) and the median tumor size was 4.4 cm (IQR, 3.3-5.6). The median baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was 60 ml/min/1.73 m2. Of the patients, 40% had mild to moderate eGFR (30-60 ml/min). The two main treatment regimens were 42 Gy in three fractions and 26 Gy in one fraction. The LC probability was 98% at 1 yr (95% confidence interval [CI], 94-99) and 96% (95% CI, 92-99) at 5 yr. The median OS was 58 mo and the cumulative incidence of cancer-related deaths was 8% (95% CI, 3-15) at 5 yr. Seventy-one patients (49%) experienced at least one toxicity, including grade 1 in the majority (32%), grade 2 (14%), and grade 3 (1%). Two patients (1%) underwent dialysis (grade 4). The median eGFR loss was -7 ml/min (IQR, -17; 0) at the last follow-up.

Conclusions and clinical implications: This large series of primary RCC treated with SBRT demonstrates excellent LC and renal function preservation, and is associated with an acceptable toxicity profile. SBRT is an alternative treatment for inoperable patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.50
自引率
2.40%
发文量
128
审稿时长
20 days
期刊介绍: Journal Name: European Urology Oncology Affiliation: Official Journal of the European Association of Urology Focus: First official publication of the EAU fully devoted to the study of genitourinary malignancies Aims to deliver high-quality research Content: Includes original articles, opinion piece editorials, and invited reviews Covers clinical, basic, and translational research Publication Frequency: Six times a year in electronic format
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信