COVID-19对院内心脏骤停激活的影响:回顾性研究

Ghali Ballout, Marta Magaldi Mendaña, Bartomeu Ramis Bou, Cristian Torres Quevedo, Adriana Capdevila Freixas, Silvia Moreno-Jurico, Enrique Jesús Carrero Cardenal, Jaime Fontanals Dotras
{"title":"COVID-19对院内心脏骤停激活的影响:回顾性研究","authors":"Ghali Ballout, Marta Magaldi Mendaña, Bartomeu Ramis Bou, Cristian Torres Quevedo, Adriana Capdevila Freixas, Silvia Moreno-Jurico, Enrique Jesús Carrero Cardenal, Jaime Fontanals Dotras","doi":"10.1016/j.medine.2025.502137","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To analyze whether the characteristics of the patients treated by the in-hospital cardiorespiratory arrest team, IHCA and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) were different in the period before the COVID-19 compared to the pandemic period; also analyzing the differences between COVID+ and COVID- patients.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Observational and retrospective study from January 1st, 2018, to December 31st, 2021.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Tertiary hospital.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>All adult patients over 18 years old requiring attention from the IHCA response team.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>CPR maneuvers according to the advanced life support guidelines of the European Resuscitation Council published in 2015, as well as the modifications made in the COVID era (2020).</p><p><strong>Main variables: </strong>Demographic and epidemiological data, activations of the IHCA response team, CA data, hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay, survival and neurological outcome at hospital discharge.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 368 patients were analyzed: 173 in the pre-pandemic group and 195 in the pandemic group. The neurological outcome was better in the pre-pandemic group, and COVID+ patients had a longer ICU length of stay. However, no differences in the response time of the CPR team or in CPR duration were found, nor in immediate survival or at hospital discharge, between both groups or between COVID+ and COVID- patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Changes in CPR care protocols due to the COVID-19 pandemia did not seem to affect response times from IHCA team neither immediate nor discharge survival.</p>","PeriodicalId":94139,"journal":{"name":"Medicina intensiva","volume":" ","pages":"502137"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of COVID-19 in the in-hospital cardiac arrest activations: Retrospective study.\",\"authors\":\"Ghali Ballout, Marta Magaldi Mendaña, Bartomeu Ramis Bou, Cristian Torres Quevedo, Adriana Capdevila Freixas, Silvia Moreno-Jurico, Enrique Jesús Carrero Cardenal, Jaime Fontanals Dotras\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.medine.2025.502137\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To analyze whether the characteristics of the patients treated by the in-hospital cardiorespiratory arrest team, IHCA and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) were different in the period before the COVID-19 compared to the pandemic period; also analyzing the differences between COVID+ and COVID- patients.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Observational and retrospective study from January 1st, 2018, to December 31st, 2021.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Tertiary hospital.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>All adult patients over 18 years old requiring attention from the IHCA response team.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>CPR maneuvers according to the advanced life support guidelines of the European Resuscitation Council published in 2015, as well as the modifications made in the COVID era (2020).</p><p><strong>Main variables: </strong>Demographic and epidemiological data, activations of the IHCA response team, CA data, hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay, survival and neurological outcome at hospital discharge.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 368 patients were analyzed: 173 in the pre-pandemic group and 195 in the pandemic group. The neurological outcome was better in the pre-pandemic group, and COVID+ patients had a longer ICU length of stay. However, no differences in the response time of the CPR team or in CPR duration were found, nor in immediate survival or at hospital discharge, between both groups or between COVID+ and COVID- patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Changes in CPR care protocols due to the COVID-19 pandemia did not seem to affect response times from IHCA team neither immediate nor discharge survival.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94139,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medicina intensiva\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"502137\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medicina intensiva\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medine.2025.502137\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicina intensiva","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medine.2025.502137","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:分析新型冠状病毒肺炎疫情前与疫情大流行期相比,院内心肺骤停团队、IHCA和心肺复苏术(CPR)治疗的患者特征是否存在差异;并分析了COVID+和COVID- 1患者的差异。设计:从2018年1月1日至2021年12月31日进行观察性和回顾性研究。单位:三级医院。患者:所有18岁以上需要IHCA反应小组关注的成年患者。干预措施:根据2015年欧洲复苏委员会发布的先进生命支持指南进行心肺复苏演习,以及在COVID时代(2020年)所做的修改。主要变量:人口统计和流行病学数据、IHCA反应小组的激活情况、CA数据、医院和重症监护病房(ICU)的住院时间、生存和出院时的神经预后。结果:共分析了368例患者:173例为大流行前组,195例为大流行组。大流行前组神经系统预后较好,COVID+患者的ICU住院时间较长。然而,在两组之间或COVID+和COVID-患者之间,心肺复苏术小组的反应时间或心肺复苏术持续时间、即时生存期或出院时均未发现差异。结论:COVID-19大流行导致的心肺复苏术护理方案的变化似乎并未影响IHCA团队的反应时间,既没有影响即时生存,也没有影响出院生存。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of COVID-19 in the in-hospital cardiac arrest activations: Retrospective study.

Objective: To analyze whether the characteristics of the patients treated by the in-hospital cardiorespiratory arrest team, IHCA and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) were different in the period before the COVID-19 compared to the pandemic period; also analyzing the differences between COVID+ and COVID- patients.

Design: Observational and retrospective study from January 1st, 2018, to December 31st, 2021.

Setting: Tertiary hospital.

Patients: All adult patients over 18 years old requiring attention from the IHCA response team.

Interventions: CPR maneuvers according to the advanced life support guidelines of the European Resuscitation Council published in 2015, as well as the modifications made in the COVID era (2020).

Main variables: Demographic and epidemiological data, activations of the IHCA response team, CA data, hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay, survival and neurological outcome at hospital discharge.

Results: A total of 368 patients were analyzed: 173 in the pre-pandemic group and 195 in the pandemic group. The neurological outcome was better in the pre-pandemic group, and COVID+ patients had a longer ICU length of stay. However, no differences in the response time of the CPR team or in CPR duration were found, nor in immediate survival or at hospital discharge, between both groups or between COVID+ and COVID- patients.

Conclusions: Changes in CPR care protocols due to the COVID-19 pandemia did not seem to affect response times from IHCA team neither immediate nor discharge survival.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信