接受SGLT2抑制剂治疗的心力衰竭患者住院与出院后的再住院率

The British journal of cardiology Pub Date : 2024-08-06 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.5837/bjc.2024.032
Michelle Che Ting Yick, Roy Bo Wang, Shanti Velmurugan, Martin Thomas, Simon Woldman, Ceri Davies, Sveeta Badiani, Debashish Das, Paul Wright, Sotiris Antoniou, Christopher Primus, Francesco Papalia, Angela Gallagher
{"title":"接受SGLT2抑制剂治疗的心力衰竭患者住院与出院后的再住院率","authors":"Michelle Che Ting Yick, Roy Bo Wang, Shanti Velmurugan, Martin Thomas, Simon Woldman, Ceri Davies, Sveeta Badiani, Debashish Das, Paul Wright, Sotiris Antoniou, Christopher Primus, Francesco Papalia, Angela Gallagher","doi":"10.5837/bjc.2024.032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) have been shown to reduce cardiovascular rehospitalisation in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) patients. However, it is unknown whether initiating SGLT2i during an inpatient stay for a HFrEF exacerbation results in better outcomes versus initiation post-discharge in a cohort of diabetic and non-diabetic patients. This study compares cardiovascular rehospitalisation, heart failure specific rehospitalisation, cardiovascular death, and all-cause death between patients initiated on SGLT2i as an inpatient versus post-discharge. A retrospective study of four hospitals in England involving 184 patients with HFrEF exacerbations between March 2021 and June 2022 was performed. Cardiovascular rehospitalisation, heart failure specific rehospitalisation, cardiovascular death, and all-cause death were compared between the two groups using Cox regression. A Cox proportionalhazards model was fitted to determine predictors of cardiovascular rehospitalisation. There were 148 (80.4%) individuals who received SGLT2i as an inpatient, while 36 (19.6%) individuals received SGLT2i post-discharge. Median followup was 6.5 months for inpatients and 7.5 months for post-discharge patients (p=0.522). SGLT2i inpatients had significantly reduced cardiovascular rehospitalisations (22.3%) versus post-discharge patients (44.4%) (p=0.005), and significantly reduced heart failure specific rehospitalisations (10.1%) versus post-discharge patients (27.8%) (p=0.018). There was no significant difference in all-cause death (p=0.743) and cardiovascular death (p=0.816) between the two groups. Initiating SGLT2i post-discharge was an independent predictor of cardiovascular rehospitalisation (hazard ratio 2.40, 95% confidence interval 1.31 to 4.41, p=0.005). In conclusion, inpatient SGLT2i initiation for HFrEF exacerbations may reduce cardiovascular and heart failure specific rehospitalisation versus initiation postdischarge. In the absence of contraindications, clinicians should consider initiating SGLT2i once patients are clinically stable during inpatient HFrEF admissions.</p>","PeriodicalId":74959,"journal":{"name":"The British journal of cardiology","volume":"31 3","pages":"032"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11800134/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rehospitalisation rates of heart failure patients treated with SGLT2 inhibitors as an inpatient versus post-discharge.\",\"authors\":\"Michelle Che Ting Yick, Roy Bo Wang, Shanti Velmurugan, Martin Thomas, Simon Woldman, Ceri Davies, Sveeta Badiani, Debashish Das, Paul Wright, Sotiris Antoniou, Christopher Primus, Francesco Papalia, Angela Gallagher\",\"doi\":\"10.5837/bjc.2024.032\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) have been shown to reduce cardiovascular rehospitalisation in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) patients. However, it is unknown whether initiating SGLT2i during an inpatient stay for a HFrEF exacerbation results in better outcomes versus initiation post-discharge in a cohort of diabetic and non-diabetic patients. This study compares cardiovascular rehospitalisation, heart failure specific rehospitalisation, cardiovascular death, and all-cause death between patients initiated on SGLT2i as an inpatient versus post-discharge. A retrospective study of four hospitals in England involving 184 patients with HFrEF exacerbations between March 2021 and June 2022 was performed. Cardiovascular rehospitalisation, heart failure specific rehospitalisation, cardiovascular death, and all-cause death were compared between the two groups using Cox regression. A Cox proportionalhazards model was fitted to determine predictors of cardiovascular rehospitalisation. There were 148 (80.4%) individuals who received SGLT2i as an inpatient, while 36 (19.6%) individuals received SGLT2i post-discharge. Median followup was 6.5 months for inpatients and 7.5 months for post-discharge patients (p=0.522). SGLT2i inpatients had significantly reduced cardiovascular rehospitalisations (22.3%) versus post-discharge patients (44.4%) (p=0.005), and significantly reduced heart failure specific rehospitalisations (10.1%) versus post-discharge patients (27.8%) (p=0.018). There was no significant difference in all-cause death (p=0.743) and cardiovascular death (p=0.816) between the two groups. Initiating SGLT2i post-discharge was an independent predictor of cardiovascular rehospitalisation (hazard ratio 2.40, 95% confidence interval 1.31 to 4.41, p=0.005). In conclusion, inpatient SGLT2i initiation for HFrEF exacerbations may reduce cardiovascular and heart failure specific rehospitalisation versus initiation postdischarge. In the absence of contraindications, clinicians should consider initiating SGLT2i once patients are clinically stable during inpatient HFrEF admissions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74959,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The British journal of cardiology\",\"volume\":\"31 3\",\"pages\":\"032\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11800134/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The British journal of cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5837/bjc.2024.032\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The British journal of cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5837/bjc.2024.032","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白-2抑制剂(SGLT2i)已被证明可降低心力衰竭伴射血分数降低(HFrEF)患者的心血管再住院率。然而,在一组糖尿病和非糖尿病患者中,在因HFrEF加重住院期间启动SGLT2i是否比出院后启动SGLT2i能获得更好的结果尚不清楚。本研究比较了SGLT2i治疗的住院患者与出院后患者的心血管再住院、心力衰竭特异性再住院、心血管死亡和全因死亡。对英国四家医院进行回顾性研究,涉及2021年3月至2022年6月期间发生HFrEF加重的184例患者。使用Cox回归比较两组患者的心血管再住院、心力衰竭特异性再住院、心血管死亡和全因死亡。采用Cox比例风险模型确定心血管再住院的预测因素。住院期间接受SGLT2i治疗的有148人(80.4%),出院后接受SGLT2i治疗的有36人(19.6%)。住院患者中位随访时间为6.5个月,出院患者中位随访时间为7.5个月(p=0.522)。SGLT2i住院患者心血管疾病再住院率(22.3%)显著低于出院后患者(44.4%)(p=0.005),心力衰竭特异性再住院率(10.1%)显著低于出院后患者(27.8%)(p=0.018)。两组全因死亡(p=0.743)和心血管死亡(p=0.816)无统计学差异。出院后启动SGLT2i是心血管再住院的独立预测因子(风险比2.40,95%可信区间1.31 ~ 4.41,p=0.005)。总之,与出院后开始治疗相比,住院患者因HFrEF加重而开始SGLT2i治疗可能减少心血管和心力衰竭特异性再住院。在没有禁忌症的情况下,一旦患者在HFrEF住院期间临床稳定,临床医生应考虑启动SGLT2i。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Rehospitalisation rates of heart failure patients treated with SGLT2 inhibitors as an inpatient versus post-discharge.

Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) have been shown to reduce cardiovascular rehospitalisation in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) patients. However, it is unknown whether initiating SGLT2i during an inpatient stay for a HFrEF exacerbation results in better outcomes versus initiation post-discharge in a cohort of diabetic and non-diabetic patients. This study compares cardiovascular rehospitalisation, heart failure specific rehospitalisation, cardiovascular death, and all-cause death between patients initiated on SGLT2i as an inpatient versus post-discharge. A retrospective study of four hospitals in England involving 184 patients with HFrEF exacerbations between March 2021 and June 2022 was performed. Cardiovascular rehospitalisation, heart failure specific rehospitalisation, cardiovascular death, and all-cause death were compared between the two groups using Cox regression. A Cox proportionalhazards model was fitted to determine predictors of cardiovascular rehospitalisation. There were 148 (80.4%) individuals who received SGLT2i as an inpatient, while 36 (19.6%) individuals received SGLT2i post-discharge. Median followup was 6.5 months for inpatients and 7.5 months for post-discharge patients (p=0.522). SGLT2i inpatients had significantly reduced cardiovascular rehospitalisations (22.3%) versus post-discharge patients (44.4%) (p=0.005), and significantly reduced heart failure specific rehospitalisations (10.1%) versus post-discharge patients (27.8%) (p=0.018). There was no significant difference in all-cause death (p=0.743) and cardiovascular death (p=0.816) between the two groups. Initiating SGLT2i post-discharge was an independent predictor of cardiovascular rehospitalisation (hazard ratio 2.40, 95% confidence interval 1.31 to 4.41, p=0.005). In conclusion, inpatient SGLT2i initiation for HFrEF exacerbations may reduce cardiovascular and heart failure specific rehospitalisation versus initiation postdischarge. In the absence of contraindications, clinicians should consider initiating SGLT2i once patients are clinically stable during inpatient HFrEF admissions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信