建立基于人工智能的急诊医学临床决策支持的方法学标准。

IF 2.4
CJEM Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-07 DOI:10.1007/s43678-024-00826-w
Hashim Kareemi, Henry Li, Akshay Rajaram, Jessalyn K Holodinsky, Justin N Hall, Lars Grant, Gautam Goel, Jake Hayward, Shaun Mehta, Maxim Ben-Yakov, Elyse Berger Pelletier, Frank Scheuermeyer, Kendall Ho
{"title":"建立基于人工智能的急诊医学临床决策支持的方法学标准。","authors":"Hashim Kareemi, Henry Li, Akshay Rajaram, Jessalyn K Holodinsky, Justin N Hall, Lars Grant, Gautam Goel, Jake Hayward, Shaun Mehta, Maxim Ben-Yakov, Elyse Berger Pelletier, Frank Scheuermeyer, Kendall Ho","doi":"10.1007/s43678-024-00826-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Artificial intelligence (AI) offers opportunities for managing the complexities of clinical care in the emergency department (ED), and Clinical Decision Support has been identified as a priority application. However, there is a lack of published guidance on how to rigorously develop and evaluate these tools. We sought to answer the question, \"What methodological standards should be applied to the development of AI-based Clinical Decision Support tools in the ED?\".</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted an iterative consensus-establishing activity involving a subcommittee with AI expertise followed by surveys and a live facilitated discussion with participants of the 2024 Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians Research Symposium in Saskatoon. We augmented analysis of participant feedback with large language models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We established 11 recommendations AI-based Clinical Decision Support development including the selection of a relevant problem and team of experts, standards of data quality and quantity, novel AI-specific reporting guidelines, and adherence to principles of ethics and privacy. We removed the recommendation regarding model interpretability from the final list due to a lack of consensus.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These 11 recommendations provide guiding principles and methodological standards for emergency medicine researchers to rigorously develop AI-based Clinical Decision Support tools and for clinicians to gain knowledge and trust in using them.</p>","PeriodicalId":93937,"journal":{"name":"CJEM","volume":" ","pages":"87-95"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Establishing methodological standards for the development of artificial intelligence-based Clinical Decision Support in emergency medicine.\",\"authors\":\"Hashim Kareemi, Henry Li, Akshay Rajaram, Jessalyn K Holodinsky, Justin N Hall, Lars Grant, Gautam Goel, Jake Hayward, Shaun Mehta, Maxim Ben-Yakov, Elyse Berger Pelletier, Frank Scheuermeyer, Kendall Ho\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s43678-024-00826-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Artificial intelligence (AI) offers opportunities for managing the complexities of clinical care in the emergency department (ED), and Clinical Decision Support has been identified as a priority application. However, there is a lack of published guidance on how to rigorously develop and evaluate these tools. We sought to answer the question, \\\"What methodological standards should be applied to the development of AI-based Clinical Decision Support tools in the ED?\\\".</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted an iterative consensus-establishing activity involving a subcommittee with AI expertise followed by surveys and a live facilitated discussion with participants of the 2024 Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians Research Symposium in Saskatoon. We augmented analysis of participant feedback with large language models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We established 11 recommendations AI-based Clinical Decision Support development including the selection of a relevant problem and team of experts, standards of data quality and quantity, novel AI-specific reporting guidelines, and adherence to principles of ethics and privacy. We removed the recommendation regarding model interpretability from the final list due to a lack of consensus.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These 11 recommendations provide guiding principles and methodological standards for emergency medicine researchers to rigorously develop AI-based Clinical Decision Support tools and for clinicians to gain knowledge and trust in using them.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93937,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CJEM\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"87-95\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CJEM\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43678-024-00826-w\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/7 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CJEM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43678-024-00826-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:人工智能(AI)为管理急诊科(ED)临床护理的复杂性提供了机会,临床决策支持已被确定为优先应用。然而,缺乏关于如何严格开发和评估这些工具的公开指导。我们试图回答这样一个问题:“在急诊室开发基于人工智能的临床决策支持工具时,应该采用什么样的方法标准?”方法:我们进行了一次反复的共识建立活动,由具有人工智能专业知识的小组委员会参与,随后进行了调查,并与萨斯卡通2024年加拿大急诊医师协会研究研讨会的参与者进行了现场促进讨论。我们用大型语言模型增强了对参与者反馈的分析。结果:我们建立了11条基于人工智能的临床决策支持发展建议,包括选择相关问题和专家团队、数据质量和数量标准、新颖的人工智能特定报告指南,以及遵守道德和隐私原则。由于缺乏共识,我们从最终列表中删除了关于模型可解释性的建议。结论:这11项建议为急诊医学研究人员严格开发基于人工智能的临床决策支持工具提供了指导原则和方法标准,也为临床医生在使用这些工具时获得知识和信任提供了指导原则和方法标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Establishing methodological standards for the development of artificial intelligence-based Clinical Decision Support in emergency medicine.

Objective: Artificial intelligence (AI) offers opportunities for managing the complexities of clinical care in the emergency department (ED), and Clinical Decision Support has been identified as a priority application. However, there is a lack of published guidance on how to rigorously develop and evaluate these tools. We sought to answer the question, "What methodological standards should be applied to the development of AI-based Clinical Decision Support tools in the ED?".

Methods: We conducted an iterative consensus-establishing activity involving a subcommittee with AI expertise followed by surveys and a live facilitated discussion with participants of the 2024 Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians Research Symposium in Saskatoon. We augmented analysis of participant feedback with large language models.

Results: We established 11 recommendations AI-based Clinical Decision Support development including the selection of a relevant problem and team of experts, standards of data quality and quantity, novel AI-specific reporting guidelines, and adherence to principles of ethics and privacy. We removed the recommendation regarding model interpretability from the final list due to a lack of consensus.

Conclusion: These 11 recommendations provide guiding principles and methodological standards for emergency medicine researchers to rigorously develop AI-based Clinical Decision Support tools and for clinicians to gain knowledge and trust in using them.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信