Hashim Kareemi, Henry Li, Akshay Rajaram, Jessalyn K Holodinsky, Justin N Hall, Lars Grant, Gautam Goel, Jake Hayward, Shaun Mehta, Maxim Ben-Yakov, Elyse Berger Pelletier, Frank Scheuermeyer, Kendall Ho
{"title":"建立基于人工智能的急诊医学临床决策支持的方法学标准。","authors":"Hashim Kareemi, Henry Li, Akshay Rajaram, Jessalyn K Holodinsky, Justin N Hall, Lars Grant, Gautam Goel, Jake Hayward, Shaun Mehta, Maxim Ben-Yakov, Elyse Berger Pelletier, Frank Scheuermeyer, Kendall Ho","doi":"10.1007/s43678-024-00826-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Artificial intelligence (AI) offers opportunities for managing the complexities of clinical care in the emergency department (ED), and Clinical Decision Support has been identified as a priority application. However, there is a lack of published guidance on how to rigorously develop and evaluate these tools. We sought to answer the question, \"What methodological standards should be applied to the development of AI-based Clinical Decision Support tools in the ED?\".</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted an iterative consensus-establishing activity involving a subcommittee with AI expertise followed by surveys and a live facilitated discussion with participants of the 2024 Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians Research Symposium in Saskatoon. We augmented analysis of participant feedback with large language models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We established 11 recommendations AI-based Clinical Decision Support development including the selection of a relevant problem and team of experts, standards of data quality and quantity, novel AI-specific reporting guidelines, and adherence to principles of ethics and privacy. We removed the recommendation regarding model interpretability from the final list due to a lack of consensus.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These 11 recommendations provide guiding principles and methodological standards for emergency medicine researchers to rigorously develop AI-based Clinical Decision Support tools and for clinicians to gain knowledge and trust in using them.</p>","PeriodicalId":93937,"journal":{"name":"CJEM","volume":" ","pages":"87-95"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Establishing methodological standards for the development of artificial intelligence-based Clinical Decision Support in emergency medicine.\",\"authors\":\"Hashim Kareemi, Henry Li, Akshay Rajaram, Jessalyn K Holodinsky, Justin N Hall, Lars Grant, Gautam Goel, Jake Hayward, Shaun Mehta, Maxim Ben-Yakov, Elyse Berger Pelletier, Frank Scheuermeyer, Kendall Ho\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s43678-024-00826-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Artificial intelligence (AI) offers opportunities for managing the complexities of clinical care in the emergency department (ED), and Clinical Decision Support has been identified as a priority application. However, there is a lack of published guidance on how to rigorously develop and evaluate these tools. We sought to answer the question, \\\"What methodological standards should be applied to the development of AI-based Clinical Decision Support tools in the ED?\\\".</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted an iterative consensus-establishing activity involving a subcommittee with AI expertise followed by surveys and a live facilitated discussion with participants of the 2024 Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians Research Symposium in Saskatoon. We augmented analysis of participant feedback with large language models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We established 11 recommendations AI-based Clinical Decision Support development including the selection of a relevant problem and team of experts, standards of data quality and quantity, novel AI-specific reporting guidelines, and adherence to principles of ethics and privacy. We removed the recommendation regarding model interpretability from the final list due to a lack of consensus.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These 11 recommendations provide guiding principles and methodological standards for emergency medicine researchers to rigorously develop AI-based Clinical Decision Support tools and for clinicians to gain knowledge and trust in using them.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93937,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CJEM\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"87-95\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CJEM\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43678-024-00826-w\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/7 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CJEM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43678-024-00826-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Establishing methodological standards for the development of artificial intelligence-based Clinical Decision Support in emergency medicine.
Objective: Artificial intelligence (AI) offers opportunities for managing the complexities of clinical care in the emergency department (ED), and Clinical Decision Support has been identified as a priority application. However, there is a lack of published guidance on how to rigorously develop and evaluate these tools. We sought to answer the question, "What methodological standards should be applied to the development of AI-based Clinical Decision Support tools in the ED?".
Methods: We conducted an iterative consensus-establishing activity involving a subcommittee with AI expertise followed by surveys and a live facilitated discussion with participants of the 2024 Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians Research Symposium in Saskatoon. We augmented analysis of participant feedback with large language models.
Results: We established 11 recommendations AI-based Clinical Decision Support development including the selection of a relevant problem and team of experts, standards of data quality and quantity, novel AI-specific reporting guidelines, and adherence to principles of ethics and privacy. We removed the recommendation regarding model interpretability from the final list due to a lack of consensus.
Conclusion: These 11 recommendations provide guiding principles and methodological standards for emergency medicine researchers to rigorously develop AI-based Clinical Decision Support tools and for clinicians to gain knowledge and trust in using them.