Polly R Britten, Darcy L McNaughton, Samantha L Moore, Shelby A Edwards, Leanne J Brown, Natasha Weaver, Tracy L Schumacher
{"title":"产妇居住地是否影响亨特新英格兰地方卫生区的低出生体重结局?","authors":"Polly R Britten, Darcy L McNaughton, Samantha L Moore, Shelby A Edwards, Leanne J Brown, Natasha Weaver, Tracy L Schumacher","doi":"10.1111/ajo.13944","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Low birth weight (LBW) is associated with adverse short-term and long-term health outcomes for neonates. The impact of maternal geographical location on rates of LBW in Australia is conflicted in existing literature.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>The aim was to identify if a difference in rates of LBW exist between neonates born to rural versus metropolitan maternal residence. Secondary aim was to identify any associated factors influencing LBW.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A secondary data analysis of retrospective health surveillance data from all births from 2018 to 2022 in the Hunter New England Local Health District (New South Wales, Australia) was performed. Logistic regression was used to determine odds ratio and adjusted odds ratio of LBW for rural versus metropolitan residence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 39,579 neonates were included in this analysis, with 50.9% of the maternal cohort residing rurally. Median maternal was age 29.2 years. Rates of LBW were higher in rural maternal residence (5.7%) compared to metropolitan residence (5.2%). Odds of neonatal LBW did not differ between rural and maternal metropolitan residence after adjusting for confounders (adjusted Odds Ratio (aOR) = 0.90, 95% CI 0.79-1.01, p = 0.07). Socioeconomic disadvantage was significantly identified as an issue associated with LBW.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>LBW neonates were more likely to be born to rural maternal residence and LBW risk factors disproportionately affected those living in rural locations. To reduce LBW in neonates, it is imperative that access to safe and affordable healthcare is available, and resources addressing LBW risk factors are specific to geographical locations.</p>","PeriodicalId":55429,"journal":{"name":"Australian & New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does Maternal Location of Residence Affect Low Birth Weight Outcomes in Hunter New England Local Health District?\",\"authors\":\"Polly R Britten, Darcy L McNaughton, Samantha L Moore, Shelby A Edwards, Leanne J Brown, Natasha Weaver, Tracy L Schumacher\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ajo.13944\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Low birth weight (LBW) is associated with adverse short-term and long-term health outcomes for neonates. The impact of maternal geographical location on rates of LBW in Australia is conflicted in existing literature.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>The aim was to identify if a difference in rates of LBW exist between neonates born to rural versus metropolitan maternal residence. Secondary aim was to identify any associated factors influencing LBW.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A secondary data analysis of retrospective health surveillance data from all births from 2018 to 2022 in the Hunter New England Local Health District (New South Wales, Australia) was performed. Logistic regression was used to determine odds ratio and adjusted odds ratio of LBW for rural versus metropolitan residence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 39,579 neonates were included in this analysis, with 50.9% of the maternal cohort residing rurally. Median maternal was age 29.2 years. Rates of LBW were higher in rural maternal residence (5.7%) compared to metropolitan residence (5.2%). Odds of neonatal LBW did not differ between rural and maternal metropolitan residence after adjusting for confounders (adjusted Odds Ratio (aOR) = 0.90, 95% CI 0.79-1.01, p = 0.07). Socioeconomic disadvantage was significantly identified as an issue associated with LBW.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>LBW neonates were more likely to be born to rural maternal residence and LBW risk factors disproportionately affected those living in rural locations. To reduce LBW in neonates, it is imperative that access to safe and affordable healthcare is available, and resources addressing LBW risk factors are specific to geographical locations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55429,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian & New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian & New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/ajo.13944\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian & New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ajo.13944","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:低出生体重(LBW)与新生儿不良的短期和长期健康结局相关。在澳大利亚,产妇地理位置对LBW率的影响在现有文献中是相互矛盾的。目的:目的是确定在农村和都市母亲居住的新生儿中是否存在LBW率的差异。次要目的是确定影响LBW的任何相关因素。材料和方法:对澳大利亚新南威尔士州亨特新英格兰地方卫生区2018年至2022年所有新生儿的回顾性健康监测数据进行二次数据分析。采用Logistic回归方法确定农村居民与都市居民的体重优势比和调整优势比。结果:共有39,579名新生儿被纳入本分析,其中50.9%的产妇队列居住在农村。产妇的中位年龄为29.2岁。农村孕产妇的LBW率(5.7%)高于城市孕产妇(5.2%)。调整混杂因素后,农村地区和城市地区新生儿低体重的几率没有差异(调整后的优势比(aOR) = 0.90, 95% CI 0.79-1.01, p = 0.07)。社会经济劣势被显著认定为与低体重相关的一个问题。结论:低体重新生儿更有可能出生在农村孕产妇居住地,低体重危险因素对农村孕产妇的影响不成比例。为了减少新生儿的低体重,必须提供安全和负担得起的医疗保健,并且针对低体重风险因素的资源是针对地理位置的。
Does Maternal Location of Residence Affect Low Birth Weight Outcomes in Hunter New England Local Health District?
Background: Low birth weight (LBW) is associated with adverse short-term and long-term health outcomes for neonates. The impact of maternal geographical location on rates of LBW in Australia is conflicted in existing literature.
Aims: The aim was to identify if a difference in rates of LBW exist between neonates born to rural versus metropolitan maternal residence. Secondary aim was to identify any associated factors influencing LBW.
Materials and methods: A secondary data analysis of retrospective health surveillance data from all births from 2018 to 2022 in the Hunter New England Local Health District (New South Wales, Australia) was performed. Logistic regression was used to determine odds ratio and adjusted odds ratio of LBW for rural versus metropolitan residence.
Results: A total of 39,579 neonates were included in this analysis, with 50.9% of the maternal cohort residing rurally. Median maternal was age 29.2 years. Rates of LBW were higher in rural maternal residence (5.7%) compared to metropolitan residence (5.2%). Odds of neonatal LBW did not differ between rural and maternal metropolitan residence after adjusting for confounders (adjusted Odds Ratio (aOR) = 0.90, 95% CI 0.79-1.01, p = 0.07). Socioeconomic disadvantage was significantly identified as an issue associated with LBW.
Conclusions: LBW neonates were more likely to be born to rural maternal residence and LBW risk factors disproportionately affected those living in rural locations. To reduce LBW in neonates, it is imperative that access to safe and affordable healthcare is available, and resources addressing LBW risk factors are specific to geographical locations.
期刊介绍:
The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (ANZJOG) is an editorially independent publication owned by the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RANZCOG) and the RANZCOG Research foundation. ANZJOG aims to provide a medium for the publication of original contributions to clinical practice and/or research in all fields of obstetrics and gynaecology and related disciplines. Articles are peer reviewed by clinicians or researchers expert in the field of the submitted work. From time to time the journal will also publish printed abstracts from the RANZCOG Annual Scientific Meeting and meetings of relevant special interest groups, where the accepted abstracts have undergone the journals peer review acceptance process.