COVID-19大流行期间美国初级保健服务可及性和能力的变化

IF 9.5 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Matthew Mackwood, Elliott Fisher, Rachel O Schmidt, Ching-Wen W Yang, A James O'Malley, Hector P Rodriguez, Stephen Shortell, Ellesse-Roselee L Akré, Karen E Schifferdecker
{"title":"COVID-19大流行期间美国初级保健服务可及性和能力的变化","authors":"Matthew Mackwood, Elliott Fisher, Rachel O Schmidt, Ching-Wen W Yang, A James O'Malley, Hector P Rodriguez, Stephen Shortell, Ellesse-Roselee L Akré, Karen E Schifferdecker","doi":"10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.5237","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Many of the capabilities needed to deliver accessible, high-quality primary care have been defined, but little is known about how their implementation has changed in US practices over the course of the COVID-19 pandemic or about the factors associated with greater capabilities.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe US primary care practices' accessibility and capabilities and examine recent changes.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This was a retrospective cohort study across 2 surveys, in 2017 to 2018 and 2022 to 2023, among a national sample of primary care practice leaders in the US. Data were analyzed from January 2023 to September 2024.</p><p><strong>Exposures: </strong>Degree of integrated practice ownership and accountable care organization (ACO) participation.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>Differences by practice ownership and ACO participation, and changes over time in access to care and care delivery capabilities. These were measured by composite scores of responses standardized to a scale of 0 to 100.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This analysis included 710 practices, of which 234 were independently owned, 105 were physician group owned, and 321 were hospital/health system owned in 2017 to 2018, and 68 practices reported no ACO participation, 107 joined between surveys, and 486 otherwise participated in ACOs. Access to care (measured as extended weekday or weekend hours) was reported to decline from the first survey in 2017 to 2018 to the second in 2022 to 2023. Hospital/health system practices and ACO participants had higher rates of extended weekday hours than their comparators in 2022 to 2023. Average capability scores increased from 51 to 54 (increase of 4 points [95% CI, 1-6 points]). There was wide variation in scores within all ownership and ACO participant or nonparticipant groups. Capability scores were higher on average for more integrated practices (for physician groups compared to independent practices, 12 points [95% CI, 5-19 points] in 2017-2018 and 12 points [95% CI, 7-16 points] in 2022-2023) and for ACO participants compared to nonparticipants (13-point difference [6 to 20] in 2017-2018 and 12-point difference [6 to 18] in 2022-2023).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>In this cohort study, over the time period including the COVID-19 pandemic, primary care practices reported a decline in access to care, while average practice capabilities improved. Integrated practice ownership and ACO participation were both associated with better access and capability scores, suggesting that value-based payment and integrated care delivery support the development of higher-quality primary care. Variations across practices point to large opportunities for improvement overall and underscore the importance of incentives and structures as levers to improve primary care delivery.</p>","PeriodicalId":53180,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Health Forum","volume":"6 2","pages":"e245237"},"PeriodicalIF":9.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11806387/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Changes in US Primary Care Access and Capabilities During the COVID-19 Pandemic.\",\"authors\":\"Matthew Mackwood, Elliott Fisher, Rachel O Schmidt, Ching-Wen W Yang, A James O'Malley, Hector P Rodriguez, Stephen Shortell, Ellesse-Roselee L Akré, Karen E Schifferdecker\",\"doi\":\"10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.5237\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Many of the capabilities needed to deliver accessible, high-quality primary care have been defined, but little is known about how their implementation has changed in US practices over the course of the COVID-19 pandemic or about the factors associated with greater capabilities.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe US primary care practices' accessibility and capabilities and examine recent changes.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This was a retrospective cohort study across 2 surveys, in 2017 to 2018 and 2022 to 2023, among a national sample of primary care practice leaders in the US. Data were analyzed from January 2023 to September 2024.</p><p><strong>Exposures: </strong>Degree of integrated practice ownership and accountable care organization (ACO) participation.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>Differences by practice ownership and ACO participation, and changes over time in access to care and care delivery capabilities. These were measured by composite scores of responses standardized to a scale of 0 to 100.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This analysis included 710 practices, of which 234 were independently owned, 105 were physician group owned, and 321 were hospital/health system owned in 2017 to 2018, and 68 practices reported no ACO participation, 107 joined between surveys, and 486 otherwise participated in ACOs. Access to care (measured as extended weekday or weekend hours) was reported to decline from the first survey in 2017 to 2018 to the second in 2022 to 2023. Hospital/health system practices and ACO participants had higher rates of extended weekday hours than their comparators in 2022 to 2023. Average capability scores increased from 51 to 54 (increase of 4 points [95% CI, 1-6 points]). There was wide variation in scores within all ownership and ACO participant or nonparticipant groups. Capability scores were higher on average for more integrated practices (for physician groups compared to independent practices, 12 points [95% CI, 5-19 points] in 2017-2018 and 12 points [95% CI, 7-16 points] in 2022-2023) and for ACO participants compared to nonparticipants (13-point difference [6 to 20] in 2017-2018 and 12-point difference [6 to 18] in 2022-2023).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>In this cohort study, over the time period including the COVID-19 pandemic, primary care practices reported a decline in access to care, while average practice capabilities improved. Integrated practice ownership and ACO participation were both associated with better access and capability scores, suggesting that value-based payment and integrated care delivery support the development of higher-quality primary care. Variations across practices point to large opportunities for improvement overall and underscore the importance of incentives and structures as levers to improve primary care delivery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":53180,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JAMA Health Forum\",\"volume\":\"6 2\",\"pages\":\"e245237\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11806387/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JAMA Health Forum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.5237\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA Health Forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.5237","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

重要性:提供可获得的高质量初级保健所需的许多能力已经确定,但在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,这些能力的实施在美国的实践中发生了怎样的变化,以及与能力增强相关的因素,人们知之甚少。目的:描述美国初级保健实践的可及性和能力,并检查最近的变化。设计、环境和参与者:这是一项回顾性队列研究,横跨2017年至2018年和2022年至2023年的两次调查,在美国全国初级保健实践领导者样本中进行。数据分析时间为2023年1月至2024年9月。暴露:综合实践所有权和责任护理组织(ACO)参与的程度。主要结果和测量:实践所有权和ACO参与的差异,以及获得护理和护理提供能力随时间的变化。这些都是通过综合得分来衡量的,这些得分被标准化为0到100的等级。结果:本分析包括710家诊所,其中234家为独立所有,105家为医生集团所有,321家为医院/卫生系统所有,其中68家诊所未参与ACO, 107家在两次调查之间加入,486家参加了ACO。据报告,从2017年至2018年的第一次调查到2022年至2023年的第二次调查,获得医疗服务的机会(以工作日或周末延长时间衡量)有所下降。2022年至2023年,医院/卫生系统实践和ACO参与者的工作日延长时间率高于比较国。平均能力得分从51分增加到54分(增加4分[95% CI, 1-6分])。在所有所有权和ACO参与者或非参与者组中,得分差异很大。更综合的实践(医生组与独立实践相比,2017-2018年为12分[95% CI, 5-19分],2022-2023年为12分[95% CI, 7-16分])和ACO参与者与非参与者相比(2017-2018年为13分[6至20分],2022-2023年为12分[6至18分])的平均能力得分更高。结论和相关性:在这项队列研究中,在包括COVID-19大流行在内的一段时间内,初级保健实践报告了获得医疗服务的机会下降,而平均实践能力有所提高。综合实践所有权和ACO参与都与更好的可及性和能力得分相关,这表明基于价值的支付和综合医疗服务支持高质量初级医疗的发展。实践之间的差异表明总体上有很大的改进机会,并强调了激励和结构作为改善初级保健提供的杠杆的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Changes in US Primary Care Access and Capabilities During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Importance: Many of the capabilities needed to deliver accessible, high-quality primary care have been defined, but little is known about how their implementation has changed in US practices over the course of the COVID-19 pandemic or about the factors associated with greater capabilities.

Objective: To describe US primary care practices' accessibility and capabilities and examine recent changes.

Design, setting, and participants: This was a retrospective cohort study across 2 surveys, in 2017 to 2018 and 2022 to 2023, among a national sample of primary care practice leaders in the US. Data were analyzed from January 2023 to September 2024.

Exposures: Degree of integrated practice ownership and accountable care organization (ACO) participation.

Main outcomes and measures: Differences by practice ownership and ACO participation, and changes over time in access to care and care delivery capabilities. These were measured by composite scores of responses standardized to a scale of 0 to 100.

Results: This analysis included 710 practices, of which 234 were independently owned, 105 were physician group owned, and 321 were hospital/health system owned in 2017 to 2018, and 68 practices reported no ACO participation, 107 joined between surveys, and 486 otherwise participated in ACOs. Access to care (measured as extended weekday or weekend hours) was reported to decline from the first survey in 2017 to 2018 to the second in 2022 to 2023. Hospital/health system practices and ACO participants had higher rates of extended weekday hours than their comparators in 2022 to 2023. Average capability scores increased from 51 to 54 (increase of 4 points [95% CI, 1-6 points]). There was wide variation in scores within all ownership and ACO participant or nonparticipant groups. Capability scores were higher on average for more integrated practices (for physician groups compared to independent practices, 12 points [95% CI, 5-19 points] in 2017-2018 and 12 points [95% CI, 7-16 points] in 2022-2023) and for ACO participants compared to nonparticipants (13-point difference [6 to 20] in 2017-2018 and 12-point difference [6 to 18] in 2022-2023).

Conclusions and relevance: In this cohort study, over the time period including the COVID-19 pandemic, primary care practices reported a decline in access to care, while average practice capabilities improved. Integrated practice ownership and ACO participation were both associated with better access and capability scores, suggesting that value-based payment and integrated care delivery support the development of higher-quality primary care. Variations across practices point to large opportunities for improvement overall and underscore the importance of incentives and structures as levers to improve primary care delivery.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
7.80%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: JAMA Health Forum is an international, peer-reviewed, online, open access journal that addresses health policy and strategies affecting medicine, health, and health care. The journal publishes original research, evidence-based reports, and opinion about national and global health policy. It covers innovative approaches to health care delivery and health care economics, access, quality, safety, equity, and reform. In addition to publishing articles, JAMA Health Forum also features commentary from health policy leaders on the JAMA Forum. It covers news briefs on major reports released by government agencies, foundations, health policy think tanks, and other policy-focused organizations. JAMA Health Forum is a member of the JAMA Network, which is a consortium of peer-reviewed, general medical and specialty publications. The journal presents curated health policy content from across the JAMA Network, including journals such as JAMA and JAMA Internal Medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信