预防性TIPS与选择性TIPS在EGVB肝硬化患者中的比较疗效:一项单中心回顾性研究

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Jinfeng Ren, Tianyu Liu, Zhengying Yang, Xihui Yuan, Minyuan Yang
{"title":"预防性TIPS与选择性TIPS在EGVB肝硬化患者中的比较疗效:一项单中心回顾性研究","authors":"Jinfeng Ren, Tianyu Liu, Zhengying Yang, Xihui Yuan, Minyuan Yang","doi":"10.4103/sjg.sjg_389_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is the main method to prevent the rebleeding of esophagogastric varices. Many studies have demonstrated that pre-emptive TIPS (p-TIPS) is superior to medicine combined with endoscopic standard therapy in the efficacy of high-risk patients, but very few relevant studies reported whether p-TIPS is more effective than elective TIPS. This study aims to compare the efficacy and prognosis of p-TIPS and elective TIPS for the treatment of esophagogastric variceal bleeding (EGVB) patients with cirrhosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective study, clinical data of 92 patients with cirrhosis who accepted TIPS treatment after EGVB of cirrhosis were collected. According to the different times of TIPS, the patients were divided into the p-TIPS group and the elective TIPS group. The following information is documented: clinical manifestations and laboratory examination at 1, 3, and 6 months after the operation, survival state, the rates of rebleeding at 6 weeks and 6 months, and postoperative complications and serious adverse events during follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Child-Pugh score (P = 0.002) and MELD score (P = 0.006) in the p-TIPS group were significantly lower than those in the elective TIPS group in the 6th month after treatment. The rate of no gastric coronary vein embolization in the p-TIPS group was higher than in the elective TIPS group (P = 0.034). The hospitalized days (P < 0.001) and hospitalized costs (P < 0.001) were significantly lower in the p-TIPS group than in the elective TIPS group. No significant differences were observed between the two groups concerning rebleeding, overt hepatic encephalopathy, ascites, complications, and serious adverse events, occurrence.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The p-TIPS contributes to liver function recovery and enhances patient survival benefits at 6-months postoperation in the treatment of EGVB compared with elective TIPS, without increasing the incidence of complications and adverse events.</p>","PeriodicalId":48881,"journal":{"name":"Saudi Journal of Gastroenterology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative efficacy of pre-emptive TIPS and elective TIPS in EGVB patients with cirrhosis: A single-center retrospective study.\",\"authors\":\"Jinfeng Ren, Tianyu Liu, Zhengying Yang, Xihui Yuan, Minyuan Yang\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/sjg.sjg_389_24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is the main method to prevent the rebleeding of esophagogastric varices. Many studies have demonstrated that pre-emptive TIPS (p-TIPS) is superior to medicine combined with endoscopic standard therapy in the efficacy of high-risk patients, but very few relevant studies reported whether p-TIPS is more effective than elective TIPS. This study aims to compare the efficacy and prognosis of p-TIPS and elective TIPS for the treatment of esophagogastric variceal bleeding (EGVB) patients with cirrhosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective study, clinical data of 92 patients with cirrhosis who accepted TIPS treatment after EGVB of cirrhosis were collected. According to the different times of TIPS, the patients were divided into the p-TIPS group and the elective TIPS group. The following information is documented: clinical manifestations and laboratory examination at 1, 3, and 6 months after the operation, survival state, the rates of rebleeding at 6 weeks and 6 months, and postoperative complications and serious adverse events during follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Child-Pugh score (P = 0.002) and MELD score (P = 0.006) in the p-TIPS group were significantly lower than those in the elective TIPS group in the 6th month after treatment. The rate of no gastric coronary vein embolization in the p-TIPS group was higher than in the elective TIPS group (P = 0.034). The hospitalized days (P < 0.001) and hospitalized costs (P < 0.001) were significantly lower in the p-TIPS group than in the elective TIPS group. No significant differences were observed between the two groups concerning rebleeding, overt hepatic encephalopathy, ascites, complications, and serious adverse events, occurrence.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The p-TIPS contributes to liver function recovery and enhances patient survival benefits at 6-months postoperation in the treatment of EGVB compared with elective TIPS, without increasing the incidence of complications and adverse events.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48881,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Saudi Journal of Gastroenterology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Saudi Journal of Gastroenterology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/sjg.sjg_389_24\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Saudi Journal of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/sjg.sjg_389_24","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:经颈静脉肝内门静脉系统分流术(TIPS)是预防食管胃静脉曲张再出血的主要方法。许多研究表明,在高危患者中,预防性TIPS (p-TIPS)的疗效优于药物联合内镜标准治疗,但很少有相关研究报道p-TIPS是否比选择性TIPS更有效。本研究旨在比较p-TIPS与选择性TIPS治疗食管胃静脉曲张出血(EGVB)肝硬化患者的疗效和预后。方法:回顾性分析92例肝硬化EGVB术后接受TIPS治疗的患者的临床资料。根据TIPS时间的不同,将患者分为p-TIPS组和选择性TIPS组。记录了以下信息:术后1、3、6个月的临床表现和实验室检查,生存状态,6周和6个月的再出血率,随访期间的术后并发症和严重不良事件。结果:治疗后6个月,P -TIPS组Child-Pugh评分(P = 0.002)和MELD评分(P = 0.006)显著低于选择性TIPS组。P -TIPS组未发生胃冠状静脉栓塞的发生率高于选择性TIPS组(P = 0.034)。P -TIPS组住院天数(P < 0.001)和住院费用(P < 0.001)显著低于选择性TIPS组。两组在再出血、明显肝性脑病、腹水、并发症和严重不良事件发生方面无显著差异。结论:与选择性TIPS相比,p-TIPS有助于EGVB术后6个月的肝功能恢复和患者生存获益,且未增加并发症和不良事件的发生率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative efficacy of pre-emptive TIPS and elective TIPS in EGVB patients with cirrhosis: A single-center retrospective study.

Background: Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is the main method to prevent the rebleeding of esophagogastric varices. Many studies have demonstrated that pre-emptive TIPS (p-TIPS) is superior to medicine combined with endoscopic standard therapy in the efficacy of high-risk patients, but very few relevant studies reported whether p-TIPS is more effective than elective TIPS. This study aims to compare the efficacy and prognosis of p-TIPS and elective TIPS for the treatment of esophagogastric variceal bleeding (EGVB) patients with cirrhosis.

Methods: In this retrospective study, clinical data of 92 patients with cirrhosis who accepted TIPS treatment after EGVB of cirrhosis were collected. According to the different times of TIPS, the patients were divided into the p-TIPS group and the elective TIPS group. The following information is documented: clinical manifestations and laboratory examination at 1, 3, and 6 months after the operation, survival state, the rates of rebleeding at 6 weeks and 6 months, and postoperative complications and serious adverse events during follow-up.

Results: The Child-Pugh score (P = 0.002) and MELD score (P = 0.006) in the p-TIPS group were significantly lower than those in the elective TIPS group in the 6th month after treatment. The rate of no gastric coronary vein embolization in the p-TIPS group was higher than in the elective TIPS group (P = 0.034). The hospitalized days (P < 0.001) and hospitalized costs (P < 0.001) were significantly lower in the p-TIPS group than in the elective TIPS group. No significant differences were observed between the two groups concerning rebleeding, overt hepatic encephalopathy, ascites, complications, and serious adverse events, occurrence.

Conclusion: The p-TIPS contributes to liver function recovery and enhances patient survival benefits at 6-months postoperation in the treatment of EGVB compared with elective TIPS, without increasing the incidence of complications and adverse events.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Saudi Journal of Gastroenterology
Saudi Journal of Gastroenterology GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
3.70%
发文量
63
审稿时长
28 weeks
期刊介绍: The Saudi Journal of Gastroenterology (SJG) is an open access peer-reviewed publication. Authors are invited to submit articles in the field of gastroenterology, hepatology and nutrition, with a wide spectrum of coverage including basic science, epidemiology, diagnostics, therapeutics, public health, and standards of health care in relation to the concerned specialty. Review articles are usually by invitation. However review articles of current interest and a high standard of scientific value could also be considered for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信