见习冲突诊断:来自医学生经验的见解。

IF 1.7 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Erin S Barry, Joseph C L'Huillier, Bobbie Ann Adair White
{"title":"见习冲突诊断:来自医学生经验的见解。","authors":"Erin S Barry, Joseph C L'Huillier, Bobbie Ann Adair White","doi":"10.1136/leader-2024-001123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Conflict is an inevitable part of clinical training and often arises from differences in opinions or misunderstandings. Most studies around healthcare conflict focus on perspectives of physicians and nurses, overlooking medical students' unique perspectives. This study explores medical students' experiences with conflicts during clerkship, examining types, triggers, and conflict management styles.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An educational session introduced medical students to conflict types, conflict management modes, and triggers. A total of 167 students wrote reflections about conflicts experienced or observed during their rotations. Both quantitative and qualitative elements were analysed using thematic content analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Conflicts most frequently occurred during surgery (n=49, 32.9%) and internal medicine (n=41, 27.5%) rotations, often involving residents (n=110, 44.7%) and attendings (n=55, 22.4%). Task-related conflicts were most common (n=113, 53.8%), with students primarily using an avoiding (n=91, 60.3%) mode, while others were perceived as using a competing (n=122, 65.2%) mode. Most conflicts were reported as being handled poorly (n=107, 64.8%). Students described five main conflict triggers: (1) conflicts stemming from unclear expectations; (2) hostile or false communication as a conflict driver; (3) unsafe environments reinforced by hierarchy and power; (4) mistrust in team relationships and (5) resident stress impacting student experiences.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Identifying conflict characteristics from a student perspective can guide curricular improvements to better prepare students for clerkships and professional practice. Awareness of conflict management styles, types and triggers enables proactive conflict resolution, fostering growth or constructive outcomes. Findings emphasise the importance of setting clear expectations, maintaining effective communication, building psychologically safe environments, reducing stress and establishing trust between students and residents. Based on medical students' reflections, these patterns may extend to other health professions, offering a broader relevance for training and research in conflict management across clinical settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":36677,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Leader","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnosing conflict in clerkship: insights from medical students' experiences.\",\"authors\":\"Erin S Barry, Joseph C L'Huillier, Bobbie Ann Adair White\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/leader-2024-001123\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Conflict is an inevitable part of clinical training and often arises from differences in opinions or misunderstandings. Most studies around healthcare conflict focus on perspectives of physicians and nurses, overlooking medical students' unique perspectives. This study explores medical students' experiences with conflicts during clerkship, examining types, triggers, and conflict management styles.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An educational session introduced medical students to conflict types, conflict management modes, and triggers. A total of 167 students wrote reflections about conflicts experienced or observed during their rotations. Both quantitative and qualitative elements were analysed using thematic content analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Conflicts most frequently occurred during surgery (n=49, 32.9%) and internal medicine (n=41, 27.5%) rotations, often involving residents (n=110, 44.7%) and attendings (n=55, 22.4%). Task-related conflicts were most common (n=113, 53.8%), with students primarily using an avoiding (n=91, 60.3%) mode, while others were perceived as using a competing (n=122, 65.2%) mode. Most conflicts were reported as being handled poorly (n=107, 64.8%). Students described five main conflict triggers: (1) conflicts stemming from unclear expectations; (2) hostile or false communication as a conflict driver; (3) unsafe environments reinforced by hierarchy and power; (4) mistrust in team relationships and (5) resident stress impacting student experiences.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Identifying conflict characteristics from a student perspective can guide curricular improvements to better prepare students for clerkships and professional practice. Awareness of conflict management styles, types and triggers enables proactive conflict resolution, fostering growth or constructive outcomes. Findings emphasise the importance of setting clear expectations, maintaining effective communication, building psychologically safe environments, reducing stress and establishing trust between students and residents. Based on medical students' reflections, these patterns may extend to other health professions, offering a broader relevance for training and research in conflict management across clinical settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36677,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Leader\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Leader\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/leader-2024-001123\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Leader","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/leader-2024-001123","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

冲突是临床培训中不可避免的一部分,通常是由于意见分歧或误解而产生的。大多数关于医疗冲突的研究都集中在医生和护士的视角上,忽视了医学生的独特视角。本研究旨在探讨医学生在实习期间的冲突经历、冲突类型、冲突触发因素及冲突管理方式。方法:通过一次教育课程向医学生介绍冲突类型、冲突管理模式和触发因素。共有167名学生写下了他们在轮换期间经历或观察到的冲突的感想。采用主题内容分析法对定量和定性因素进行了分析。结果:冲突最常发生在外科(n=49, 32.9%)和内科(n=41, 27.5%)轮转期间,通常涉及住院医师(n=110, 44.7%)和主治医师(n=55, 22.4%)。与任务相关的冲突最常见(n=113, 53.8%),学生主要使用回避模式(n=91, 60.3%),而其他人则认为使用竞争模式(n=122, 65.2%)。大多数冲突被报告为处理不当(n=107, 64.8%)。学生描述了五个主要的冲突触发因素:(1)期望不明确引起的冲突;(2)敌对或虚假的沟通作为冲突驱动因素;(3)等级和权力强化的不安全环境;(4)团队关系中的不信任;(5)住宿压力对学生体验的影响。讨论:从学生的角度确定冲突特征可以指导课程改进,使学生更好地为见习和专业实践做好准备。了解冲突管理的风格、类型和触发因素,能够积极主动地解决冲突,促进发展或取得建设性成果。研究结果强调了设定明确期望、保持有效沟通、建立心理安全环境、减轻压力以及在学生和住院医生之间建立信任的重要性。根据医学生的反思,这些模式可以扩展到其他卫生专业,为跨临床环境的冲突管理培训和研究提供更广泛的相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Diagnosing conflict in clerkship: insights from medical students' experiences.

Introduction: Conflict is an inevitable part of clinical training and often arises from differences in opinions or misunderstandings. Most studies around healthcare conflict focus on perspectives of physicians and nurses, overlooking medical students' unique perspectives. This study explores medical students' experiences with conflicts during clerkship, examining types, triggers, and conflict management styles.

Methods: An educational session introduced medical students to conflict types, conflict management modes, and triggers. A total of 167 students wrote reflections about conflicts experienced or observed during their rotations. Both quantitative and qualitative elements were analysed using thematic content analysis.

Results: Conflicts most frequently occurred during surgery (n=49, 32.9%) and internal medicine (n=41, 27.5%) rotations, often involving residents (n=110, 44.7%) and attendings (n=55, 22.4%). Task-related conflicts were most common (n=113, 53.8%), with students primarily using an avoiding (n=91, 60.3%) mode, while others were perceived as using a competing (n=122, 65.2%) mode. Most conflicts were reported as being handled poorly (n=107, 64.8%). Students described five main conflict triggers: (1) conflicts stemming from unclear expectations; (2) hostile or false communication as a conflict driver; (3) unsafe environments reinforced by hierarchy and power; (4) mistrust in team relationships and (5) resident stress impacting student experiences.

Discussion: Identifying conflict characteristics from a student perspective can guide curricular improvements to better prepare students for clerkships and professional practice. Awareness of conflict management styles, types and triggers enables proactive conflict resolution, fostering growth or constructive outcomes. Findings emphasise the importance of setting clear expectations, maintaining effective communication, building psychologically safe environments, reducing stress and establishing trust between students and residents. Based on medical students' reflections, these patterns may extend to other health professions, offering a broader relevance for training and research in conflict management across clinical settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Leader
BMJ Leader Nursing-Leadership and Management
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
7.40%
发文量
57
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信