血液透析的移动应用程序:使用移动应用程序评分量表(MARS)进行评估。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Seminars in Dialysis Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-06 DOI:10.1111/sdi.13243
Erfan Esmaeeli, Mohadeseh Sadat Khorashadizadeh, Meysam Rahmani
{"title":"血液透析的移动应用程序:使用移动应用程序评分量表(MARS)进行评估。","authors":"Erfan Esmaeeli, Mohadeseh Sadat Khorashadizadeh, Meysam Rahmani","doi":"10.1111/sdi.13243","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Mobile applications (apps) and social media could be useful in improving the condition of patients on hemodialysis. Despite the rise of mobile health apps in hemodialysis management, no research has evaluated the quality of these apps with reliable tools. This study aimed to evaluate the quality of apps designed for the self-care of patients on hemodialysis.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A review of Google Play and App Store mobile platforms was carried out to evaluate the mobile apps used for hemodialysis. These apps were assessed using the mobile application rating scale (MARS), which includes criteria for overall quality, engagement, functionality, aesthetics, and information. Search keywords included \"Dialysis,\" \"Kidney Dialysis,\" \"Hemodialysis,\" \"Haemodialysis,\" and \"Peritoneal Dialysis.\" Eligibility criteria included being related to dialysis, being designed specifically for patients, being free, being available in English, and being developed for Android and iOS platforms. The included apps were independently evaluated and rated by two reviewers using MARS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Initially, 177 apps were identified, and after the screening and review processes, six apps were selected for qualitative evaluation. The overall scores on MARS varied from 2.33 to 3.67. The \"KidneyPal: Kidney Disease Mgmt\" app received the highest scores in most MARS items. Moreover, the maximum app quality mean score belonged to \"KidneyPal: Kidney Disease Mgmt\" (4.26 out of 5).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings showed a limited number of apps available for hemodialysis, the majority of which were of low quality. The reviewed apps performed well in functionality but obtained lower scores in terms of app subjective quality. Future studies should focus on developing and testing mobile apps using assessment tools, such as MARS, as well as evaluating their impact on health behaviors and outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":21675,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Dialysis","volume":" ","pages":"102-110"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mobile Applications for Hemodialysis: Evaluation Using the Mobile App Rating Scale (MARS).\",\"authors\":\"Erfan Esmaeeli, Mohadeseh Sadat Khorashadizadeh, Meysam Rahmani\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/sdi.13243\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Mobile applications (apps) and social media could be useful in improving the condition of patients on hemodialysis. Despite the rise of mobile health apps in hemodialysis management, no research has evaluated the quality of these apps with reliable tools. This study aimed to evaluate the quality of apps designed for the self-care of patients on hemodialysis.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A review of Google Play and App Store mobile platforms was carried out to evaluate the mobile apps used for hemodialysis. These apps were assessed using the mobile application rating scale (MARS), which includes criteria for overall quality, engagement, functionality, aesthetics, and information. Search keywords included \\\"Dialysis,\\\" \\\"Kidney Dialysis,\\\" \\\"Hemodialysis,\\\" \\\"Haemodialysis,\\\" and \\\"Peritoneal Dialysis.\\\" Eligibility criteria included being related to dialysis, being designed specifically for patients, being free, being available in English, and being developed for Android and iOS platforms. The included apps were independently evaluated and rated by two reviewers using MARS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Initially, 177 apps were identified, and after the screening and review processes, six apps were selected for qualitative evaluation. The overall scores on MARS varied from 2.33 to 3.67. The \\\"KidneyPal: Kidney Disease Mgmt\\\" app received the highest scores in most MARS items. Moreover, the maximum app quality mean score belonged to \\\"KidneyPal: Kidney Disease Mgmt\\\" (4.26 out of 5).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings showed a limited number of apps available for hemodialysis, the majority of which were of low quality. The reviewed apps performed well in functionality but obtained lower scores in terms of app subjective quality. Future studies should focus on developing and testing mobile apps using assessment tools, such as MARS, as well as evaluating their impact on health behaviors and outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21675,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Seminars in Dialysis\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"102-110\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Seminars in Dialysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/sdi.13243\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/6 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in Dialysis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/sdi.13243","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导读:移动应用程序(app)和社交媒体可能有助于改善血液透析患者的状况。尽管移动健康应用程序在血液透析管理中的兴起,但没有研究用可靠的工具评估这些应用程序的质量。本研究旨在评估为血液透析患者自我护理设计的应用程序的质量。材料与方法:通过回顾谷歌Play和App Store移动平台,对血液透析使用的移动应用进行评价。这些应用程序使用移动应用评级量表(MARS)进行评估,其中包括整体质量、参与度、功能、美学和信息等标准。搜索关键词包括“透析”、“肾透析”、“血液透析”、“血液透析”和“腹膜透析”。入选标准包括与透析相关、专为患者设计、免费、有英文版本、针对Android和iOS平台开发。所包含的应用程序由两名使用MARS的评论者独立评估和评级。结果:最初确定了177个应用程序,经过筛选和审查过程,选择了6个应用程序进行定性评估。MARS的总分从2.33到3.67不等。“肾脏疾病管理”应用程序在大多数MARS项目中获得了最高分。此外,应用程序质量平均得分最高的是“肾脏病管理”(KidneyPal: Kidney Disease Mgmt)(4.26分,满分5分)。结论:研究结果表明,用于血液透析的应用程序数量有限,其中大多数质量较低。被评测的应用程序在功能上表现良好,但在应用程序主观质量方面得分较低。未来的研究应侧重于使用评估工具开发和测试移动应用程序,如MARS,以及评估它们对健康行为和结果的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mobile Applications for Hemodialysis: Evaluation Using the Mobile App Rating Scale (MARS).

Introduction: Mobile applications (apps) and social media could be useful in improving the condition of patients on hemodialysis. Despite the rise of mobile health apps in hemodialysis management, no research has evaluated the quality of these apps with reliable tools. This study aimed to evaluate the quality of apps designed for the self-care of patients on hemodialysis.

Materials and methods: A review of Google Play and App Store mobile platforms was carried out to evaluate the mobile apps used for hemodialysis. These apps were assessed using the mobile application rating scale (MARS), which includes criteria for overall quality, engagement, functionality, aesthetics, and information. Search keywords included "Dialysis," "Kidney Dialysis," "Hemodialysis," "Haemodialysis," and "Peritoneal Dialysis." Eligibility criteria included being related to dialysis, being designed specifically for patients, being free, being available in English, and being developed for Android and iOS platforms. The included apps were independently evaluated and rated by two reviewers using MARS.

Results: Initially, 177 apps were identified, and after the screening and review processes, six apps were selected for qualitative evaluation. The overall scores on MARS varied from 2.33 to 3.67. The "KidneyPal: Kidney Disease Mgmt" app received the highest scores in most MARS items. Moreover, the maximum app quality mean score belonged to "KidneyPal: Kidney Disease Mgmt" (4.26 out of 5).

Conclusion: The findings showed a limited number of apps available for hemodialysis, the majority of which were of low quality. The reviewed apps performed well in functionality but obtained lower scores in terms of app subjective quality. Future studies should focus on developing and testing mobile apps using assessment tools, such as MARS, as well as evaluating their impact on health behaviors and outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Seminars in Dialysis
Seminars in Dialysis 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
6.20%
发文量
91
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Seminars in Dialysis is a bimonthly publication focusing exclusively on cutting-edge clinical aspects of dialysis therapy. Besides publishing papers by the most respected names in the field of dialysis, the Journal has unique useful features, all designed to keep you current: -Fellows Forum -Dialysis rounds -Editorials -Opinions -Briefly noted -Summary and Comment -Guest Edited Issues -Special Articles Virtually everything you read in Seminars in Dialysis is written or solicited by the editors after choosing the most effective of nine different editorial styles and formats. They know that facts, speculations, ''how-to-do-it'' information, opinions, and news reports all play important roles in your education and the patient care you provide. Alternate issues of the journal are guest edited and focus on a single clinical topic in dialysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信