美国picu的设施间转移和入院:2023年转诊通信调查。

IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Christina L Cifra, Olivia Lin, Celestine L Gonzales, Irene Pantekidis, Madhuradhar Chegondi, Ana Lia Graciano, Eleanor Gradidge, Matthew P Malone, Matthew H M Marx, Nehal R Parikh, Charlotte Z Woods-Hill, Christopher P Landrigan
{"title":"美国picu的设施间转移和入院:2023年转诊通信调查。","authors":"Christina L Cifra, Olivia Lin, Celestine L Gonzales, Irene Pantekidis, Madhuradhar Chegondi, Ana Lia Graciano, Eleanor Gradidge, Matthew P Malone, Matthew H M Marx, Nehal R Parikh, Charlotte Z Woods-Hill, Christopher P Landrigan","doi":"10.1097/PCC.0000000000003702","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Poor communication during interfacility transfer to the PICU can harm critically ill children. Structured handoff communication can prevent harm; however, the landscape of interfacility referral communication practices across PICUs is unknown. Our objective was to describe interfacility referral communication practices among U.S. PICUs to begin identifying potential improvement opportunities.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Mixed methods study including a cross-sectional survey and semi-structured interviews.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>U.S. PICUs with greater than or equal to 10 beds in 2023.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Clinical/administrative PICU leaders.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>Sixty surveys with greater than 70% completed questions were returned from 170 invited participants (35% response rate). Respondents were mainly pediatric critical care medicine division chiefs (48%) or PICU medical directors (32%). PICUs in all U.S. continental regions were represented, which had a median of 1200 (interquartile range [IQR], 1000-1500) admissions per year, of which 29.5% (IQR, 15-39%) were patients directly transferred from other institutions. In 93% of PICUs, a verbal interfacility handoff occurs between the referring clinician and a PICU physician; however, only 24% were always guided by a standard communication tool. In 72% of PICUs, medical records were only sometimes available before patient arrival. Semi-structured interviews with seven volunteer respondents revealed the following themes: 1) standardizing communication can result in organized and efficient handoffs but may also result in inefficiencies, 2) trained staff dedicated to interfacility referrals will improve communication quality, 3) integration of handoff information into the electronic health record will improve dissemination and decrease PICU physicians' workload, and 4) implementing a structured process will require staff support to change current workflows.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Referral communication for interfacility patient transfers to the PICU occurred mainly through unstructured verbal handoffs between referring clinicians and PICU physicians. PICU leaders identified several potential benefits and challenges of standardizing interfacility referral communication.</p>","PeriodicalId":19760,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Critical Care Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Interfacility Transfer and Admission to PICUs in the United States: Survey of Referral Communications in 2023.\",\"authors\":\"Christina L Cifra, Olivia Lin, Celestine L Gonzales, Irene Pantekidis, Madhuradhar Chegondi, Ana Lia Graciano, Eleanor Gradidge, Matthew P Malone, Matthew H M Marx, Nehal R Parikh, Charlotte Z Woods-Hill, Christopher P Landrigan\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/PCC.0000000000003702\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Poor communication during interfacility transfer to the PICU can harm critically ill children. Structured handoff communication can prevent harm; however, the landscape of interfacility referral communication practices across PICUs is unknown. Our objective was to describe interfacility referral communication practices among U.S. PICUs to begin identifying potential improvement opportunities.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Mixed methods study including a cross-sectional survey and semi-structured interviews.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>U.S. PICUs with greater than or equal to 10 beds in 2023.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Clinical/administrative PICU leaders.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>Sixty surveys with greater than 70% completed questions were returned from 170 invited participants (35% response rate). Respondents were mainly pediatric critical care medicine division chiefs (48%) or PICU medical directors (32%). PICUs in all U.S. continental regions were represented, which had a median of 1200 (interquartile range [IQR], 1000-1500) admissions per year, of which 29.5% (IQR, 15-39%) were patients directly transferred from other institutions. In 93% of PICUs, a verbal interfacility handoff occurs between the referring clinician and a PICU physician; however, only 24% were always guided by a standard communication tool. In 72% of PICUs, medical records were only sometimes available before patient arrival. Semi-structured interviews with seven volunteer respondents revealed the following themes: 1) standardizing communication can result in organized and efficient handoffs but may also result in inefficiencies, 2) trained staff dedicated to interfacility referrals will improve communication quality, 3) integration of handoff information into the electronic health record will improve dissemination and decrease PICU physicians' workload, and 4) implementing a structured process will require staff support to change current workflows.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Referral communication for interfacility patient transfers to the PICU occurred mainly through unstructured verbal handoffs between referring clinicians and PICU physicians. PICU leaders identified several potential benefits and challenges of standardizing interfacility referral communication.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19760,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pediatric Critical Care Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pediatric Critical Care Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/PCC.0000000000003702\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Critical Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PCC.0000000000003702","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:在转到PICU的过程中,沟通不良可能会对危重儿童造成伤害。结构化的交接沟通可以防止伤害;然而,跨picu的设施间转诊沟通实践的前景尚不清楚。我们的目的是描述美国picu之间的机构间转诊沟通实践,以开始识别潜在的改进机会。设计:混合方法研究,包括横断面调查和半结构化访谈。设定:2023年美国picu大于等于10个床位。参与者:临床/行政PICU负责人。干预措施:没有。测量方法和主要结果:170名受邀参与者进行了60项调查,问题完成率超过70%(回复率35%)。受访者主要是儿科重症医学科主任(48%)或PICU医学主任(32%)。美国所有大陆地区的picu均有代表,每年的中位数为1200(四分位数范围[IQR], 1000-1500),其中29.5% (IQR, 15-39%)是直接从其他机构转来的患者。在93%的PICU中,转诊临床医生和PICU内科医生之间会发生口头交接;然而,只有24%的人始终受到标准沟通工具的指导。在72%的picu中,在患者到达之前只能获得医疗记录。对7名志愿者的半结构化访谈揭示了以下主题:1)标准化通信可以导致有组织和有效的移交,但也可能导致效率低下;2)专门从事机构间转诊的训练有素的工作人员将提高通信质量;3)将移交信息集成到电子健康记录中将改善传播并减少PICU医生的工作量;4)实施结构化流程将需要工作人员的支持,以改变当前的工作流程。结论:转到PICU的患者的转诊沟通主要是通过转诊临床医生和PICU医生之间非结构化的口头传递。PICU领导确定了标准化机构间转诊沟通的几个潜在好处和挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Interfacility Transfer and Admission to PICUs in the United States: Survey of Referral Communications in 2023.

Objectives: Poor communication during interfacility transfer to the PICU can harm critically ill children. Structured handoff communication can prevent harm; however, the landscape of interfacility referral communication practices across PICUs is unknown. Our objective was to describe interfacility referral communication practices among U.S. PICUs to begin identifying potential improvement opportunities.

Design: Mixed methods study including a cross-sectional survey and semi-structured interviews.

Setting: U.S. PICUs with greater than or equal to 10 beds in 2023.

Participants: Clinical/administrative PICU leaders.

Interventions: None.

Measurements and main results: Sixty surveys with greater than 70% completed questions were returned from 170 invited participants (35% response rate). Respondents were mainly pediatric critical care medicine division chiefs (48%) or PICU medical directors (32%). PICUs in all U.S. continental regions were represented, which had a median of 1200 (interquartile range [IQR], 1000-1500) admissions per year, of which 29.5% (IQR, 15-39%) were patients directly transferred from other institutions. In 93% of PICUs, a verbal interfacility handoff occurs between the referring clinician and a PICU physician; however, only 24% were always guided by a standard communication tool. In 72% of PICUs, medical records were only sometimes available before patient arrival. Semi-structured interviews with seven volunteer respondents revealed the following themes: 1) standardizing communication can result in organized and efficient handoffs but may also result in inefficiencies, 2) trained staff dedicated to interfacility referrals will improve communication quality, 3) integration of handoff information into the electronic health record will improve dissemination and decrease PICU physicians' workload, and 4) implementing a structured process will require staff support to change current workflows.

Conclusions: Referral communication for interfacility patient transfers to the PICU occurred mainly through unstructured verbal handoffs between referring clinicians and PICU physicians. PICU leaders identified several potential benefits and challenges of standardizing interfacility referral communication.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pediatric Critical Care Medicine
Pediatric Critical Care Medicine 医学-危重病医学
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
14.60%
发文量
991
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Pediatric Critical Care Medicine is written for the entire critical care team: pediatricians, neonatologists, respiratory therapists, nurses, and others who deal with pediatric patients who are critically ill or injured. International in scope, with editorial board members and contributors from around the world, the Journal includes a full range of scientific content, including clinical articles, scientific investigations, solicited reviews, and abstracts from pediatric critical care meetings. Additionally, the Journal includes abstracts of selected articles published in Chinese, French, Italian, Japanese, Portuguese, and Spanish translations - making news of advances in the field available to pediatric and neonatal intensive care practitioners worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信