不公平和错失的机会:对精神健康和物质使用障碍孕妇急诊就诊的全国分析。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Austin M Spitz, Megan E Deichen Hansen, Samantha S Goldfarb, Jeffrey S Harman
{"title":"不公平和错失的机会:对精神健康和物质使用障碍孕妇急诊就诊的全国分析。","authors":"Austin M Spitz, Megan E Deichen Hansen, Samantha S Goldfarb, Jeffrey S Harman","doi":"10.1089/jwh.2024.0223","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Objective:</i></b> This study aims to identify whether there are inequities in care for pregnant individuals with mental health or substance use disorders (MH/SUDs) seeking treatment in emergency departments (EDs) for pregnancy-related concerns. Considering their risk for poor maternal and infant outcomes, we sought to examine their experiences in EDs to target future interventions and institute referrals to integrated care systems. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> This retrospective, exploratory analysis identified ED visits for pregnancy-related concerns using the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey database from 2016 to 2020 (<i>n</i> = 1,233) to compare experiences of care by pregnant people with (<i>n</i> = 149) and without MH/SUD (<i>n</i> = 1,084). <b><i>Results:</i></b> 11.9% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 9.8 - 15.1%) of ED visits for pregnancy-related concerns were cross-coded for MH/SUD. Compared to visits by pregnant individuals without MH/SUD, visits by pregnant people with MH/SUD were 70% less likely to be asked to return to the ED for follow-up treatment (<i>p</i> = 0.027), had 3.8 times greater odds of leaving the ED prior to completing care (<i>p</i> = 0.005), and received 40% more medication upon discharge (<i>p</i> = 0.049) after controlling for demographic variables. Of those visits by pregnant people with MH/SUD, only 6.8% were given a toxicology screen and only 1.2% were seen by an MH provider. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> This nationally representative analysis of ED visits for pregnancy-related concerns identified multiple opportunities to address care inequities that affect health outcomes. Special training and processes are needed within EDs to engage pregnant people with MH/SUD to provide effective, evidence-based care interventions and referrals.</p>","PeriodicalId":17636,"journal":{"name":"Journal of women's health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Inequities and Missed Opportunities: A National Analysis of Emergency Department Visits for Pregnant Individuals with Mental Health and Substance Use Disorder.\",\"authors\":\"Austin M Spitz, Megan E Deichen Hansen, Samantha S Goldfarb, Jeffrey S Harman\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/jwh.2024.0223\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b><i>Objective:</i></b> This study aims to identify whether there are inequities in care for pregnant individuals with mental health or substance use disorders (MH/SUDs) seeking treatment in emergency departments (EDs) for pregnancy-related concerns. Considering their risk for poor maternal and infant outcomes, we sought to examine their experiences in EDs to target future interventions and institute referrals to integrated care systems. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> This retrospective, exploratory analysis identified ED visits for pregnancy-related concerns using the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey database from 2016 to 2020 (<i>n</i> = 1,233) to compare experiences of care by pregnant people with (<i>n</i> = 149) and without MH/SUD (<i>n</i> = 1,084). <b><i>Results:</i></b> 11.9% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 9.8 - 15.1%) of ED visits for pregnancy-related concerns were cross-coded for MH/SUD. Compared to visits by pregnant individuals without MH/SUD, visits by pregnant people with MH/SUD were 70% less likely to be asked to return to the ED for follow-up treatment (<i>p</i> = 0.027), had 3.8 times greater odds of leaving the ED prior to completing care (<i>p</i> = 0.005), and received 40% more medication upon discharge (<i>p</i> = 0.049) after controlling for demographic variables. Of those visits by pregnant people with MH/SUD, only 6.8% were given a toxicology screen and only 1.2% were seen by an MH provider. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> This nationally representative analysis of ED visits for pregnancy-related concerns identified multiple opportunities to address care inequities that affect health outcomes. Special training and processes are needed within EDs to engage pregnant people with MH/SUD to provide effective, evidence-based care interventions and referrals.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17636,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of women's health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of women's health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2024.0223\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of women's health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2024.0223","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在确定在急诊室(EDs)寻求妊娠相关问题治疗的精神健康或物质使用障碍(MH/ sud)孕妇是否存在护理不公平。考虑到他们对孕产妇和婴儿预后不良的风险,我们试图检查他们在急诊科的经历,以确定未来的干预措施和机构转介到综合护理系统。方法:本回顾性、探索性分析利用2016年至2020年国家医院门诊医疗调查数据库(n = 1,233)确定了因妊娠相关问题就诊的ED,比较患有(n = 149)和没有MH/SUD的孕妇(n = 1,084)的护理经历。结果:11.9%(95%可信区间[CI]: 9.8 - 15.1%)因妊娠相关问题就诊的ED患者被交叉编码为MH/SUD。与没有MH/SUD的孕妇相比,患有MH/SUD的孕妇被要求返回急诊科接受随访治疗的可能性降低了70% (p = 0.027),在完成护理之前离开急诊科的几率高出3.8倍(p = 0.005),在控制人口统计学变量后,出院时接受的药物治疗增加了40% (p = 0.049)。在那些就诊的MH/SUD孕妇中,只有6.8%的人接受了毒理学筛查,只有1.2%的人接受了MH提供者的检查。结论:这项具有全国代表性的妊娠相关问题急诊就诊分析确定了解决影响健康结果的护理不平等的多种机会。急诊科需要进行特殊的培训和流程,以吸引患有MH/SUD的孕妇提供有效的循证护理干预和转诊。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Inequities and Missed Opportunities: A National Analysis of Emergency Department Visits for Pregnant Individuals with Mental Health and Substance Use Disorder.

Objective: This study aims to identify whether there are inequities in care for pregnant individuals with mental health or substance use disorders (MH/SUDs) seeking treatment in emergency departments (EDs) for pregnancy-related concerns. Considering their risk for poor maternal and infant outcomes, we sought to examine their experiences in EDs to target future interventions and institute referrals to integrated care systems. Methods: This retrospective, exploratory analysis identified ED visits for pregnancy-related concerns using the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey database from 2016 to 2020 (n = 1,233) to compare experiences of care by pregnant people with (n = 149) and without MH/SUD (n = 1,084). Results: 11.9% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 9.8 - 15.1%) of ED visits for pregnancy-related concerns were cross-coded for MH/SUD. Compared to visits by pregnant individuals without MH/SUD, visits by pregnant people with MH/SUD were 70% less likely to be asked to return to the ED for follow-up treatment (p = 0.027), had 3.8 times greater odds of leaving the ED prior to completing care (p = 0.005), and received 40% more medication upon discharge (p = 0.049) after controlling for demographic variables. Of those visits by pregnant people with MH/SUD, only 6.8% were given a toxicology screen and only 1.2% were seen by an MH provider. Conclusion: This nationally representative analysis of ED visits for pregnancy-related concerns identified multiple opportunities to address care inequities that affect health outcomes. Special training and processes are needed within EDs to engage pregnant people with MH/SUD to provide effective, evidence-based care interventions and referrals.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of women's health
Journal of women's health 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
5.70%
发文量
197
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Women''s Health is the primary source of information for meeting the challenges of providing optimal health care for women throughout their lifespan. The Journal delivers cutting-edge advancements in diagnostic procedures, therapeutic protocols for the management of diseases, and innovative research in gender-based biology that impacts patient care and treatment. Journal of Women’s Health coverage includes: -Internal Medicine Endocrinology- Cardiology- Oncology- Obstetrics/Gynecology- Urogynecology- Psychiatry- Neurology- Nutrition- Sex-Based Biology- Complementary Medicine- Sports Medicine- Surgery- Medical Education- Public Policy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信