Amir Ebadinejad, Juan P Cobar, Pamela L Cyr-Long, Wasim Dar, Bishoy Emmanuel, Glyn Morgan, Oscar K Serrano
{"title":"评估种族中性估计肾小球滤过率等待时间修改对黑肾候选人移植等待时间和结果的影响:移植准备在等待名单上的重要性。","authors":"Amir Ebadinejad, Juan P Cobar, Pamela L Cyr-Long, Wasim Dar, Bishoy Emmanuel, Glyn Morgan, Oscar K Serrano","doi":"10.1097/XCS.0000000000001349","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In July 2022, the Organ Procurement Transplant Network mandated race-neutral estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) calculations when evaluating kidney transplantation (KT) candidates, replacing historic race-based estimates. This modification also required transplant programs to identify KT candidates on their waitlist who would have benefitted from an earlier waitlist qualification date using race-neutral calculations.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>This retrospective study analyzed Black patients listed for KT at our center between 2000 and 2023, recalculating their eGFR using race-neutral formulas. KT recipients with modified wait times (N = 26) were compared with 2 control groups: Black recipients without modifications (N = 21) and non-Black recipients (N = 89). Postoperative outcomes, including complications and readmission rates, were analyzed across groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 126 Black patients evaluated, 60.3% qualified for wait time modifications, with a median gain of 570 days (1.6 years) per patient, totaling 62,057 days (180.7 years). Within 6 months of receiving additional time, 26 patients (34%) were transplanted, mostly from deceased donors (92%) with a median kidney donor profile index of 66%. Black KT recipients with modifications had significantly higher BMI, diabetes, and peripheral vascular disease compared with controls. Readmission rates were higher among Black KT recipients with modifications, although no significant differences in graft loss or mortality were observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Race-neutral eGFR recalculations substantially improved Black KT candidates' ability to receive a KT, addressing historical disparities in KT. However, higher comorbidities and readmissions among these patients suggest the need for thorough transplant readiness evaluations before waitlist activation.</p>","PeriodicalId":17140,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American College of Surgeons","volume":" ","pages":"859-866"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Appraisal of Impact of Race-Neutral Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate Waiting Time Modification on Transplant Wait Time and Outcomes for Black Kidney Candidates: Importance of Transplant Readiness on the Waitlist.\",\"authors\":\"Amir Ebadinejad, Juan P Cobar, Pamela L Cyr-Long, Wasim Dar, Bishoy Emmanuel, Glyn Morgan, Oscar K Serrano\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/XCS.0000000000001349\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In July 2022, the Organ Procurement Transplant Network mandated race-neutral estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) calculations when evaluating kidney transplantation (KT) candidates, replacing historic race-based estimates. This modification also required transplant programs to identify KT candidates on their waitlist who would have benefitted from an earlier waitlist qualification date using race-neutral calculations.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>This retrospective study analyzed Black patients listed for KT at our center between 2000 and 2023, recalculating their eGFR using race-neutral formulas. KT recipients with modified wait times (N = 26) were compared with 2 control groups: Black recipients without modifications (N = 21) and non-Black recipients (N = 89). Postoperative outcomes, including complications and readmission rates, were analyzed across groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 126 Black patients evaluated, 60.3% qualified for wait time modifications, with a median gain of 570 days (1.6 years) per patient, totaling 62,057 days (180.7 years). Within 6 months of receiving additional time, 26 patients (34%) were transplanted, mostly from deceased donors (92%) with a median kidney donor profile index of 66%. Black KT recipients with modifications had significantly higher BMI, diabetes, and peripheral vascular disease compared with controls. Readmission rates were higher among Black KT recipients with modifications, although no significant differences in graft loss or mortality were observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Race-neutral eGFR recalculations substantially improved Black KT candidates' ability to receive a KT, addressing historical disparities in KT. However, higher comorbidities and readmissions among these patients suggest the need for thorough transplant readiness evaluations before waitlist activation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17140,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American College of Surgeons\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"859-866\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American College of Surgeons\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/XCS.0000000000001349\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/14 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American College of Surgeons","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/XCS.0000000000001349","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Appraisal of Impact of Race-Neutral Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate Waiting Time Modification on Transplant Wait Time and Outcomes for Black Kidney Candidates: Importance of Transplant Readiness on the Waitlist.
Background: In July 2022, the Organ Procurement Transplant Network mandated race-neutral estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) calculations when evaluating kidney transplantation (KT) candidates, replacing historic race-based estimates. This modification also required transplant programs to identify KT candidates on their waitlist who would have benefitted from an earlier waitlist qualification date using race-neutral calculations.
Study design: This retrospective study analyzed Black patients listed for KT at our center between 2000 and 2023, recalculating their eGFR using race-neutral formulas. KT recipients with modified wait times (N = 26) were compared with 2 control groups: Black recipients without modifications (N = 21) and non-Black recipients (N = 89). Postoperative outcomes, including complications and readmission rates, were analyzed across groups.
Results: Of 126 Black patients evaluated, 60.3% qualified for wait time modifications, with a median gain of 570 days (1.6 years) per patient, totaling 62,057 days (180.7 years). Within 6 months of receiving additional time, 26 patients (34%) were transplanted, mostly from deceased donors (92%) with a median kidney donor profile index of 66%. Black KT recipients with modifications had significantly higher BMI, diabetes, and peripheral vascular disease compared with controls. Readmission rates were higher among Black KT recipients with modifications, although no significant differences in graft loss or mortality were observed.
Conclusions: Race-neutral eGFR recalculations substantially improved Black KT candidates' ability to receive a KT, addressing historical disparities in KT. However, higher comorbidities and readmissions among these patients suggest the need for thorough transplant readiness evaluations before waitlist activation.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of the American College of Surgeons (JACS) is a monthly journal publishing peer-reviewed original contributions on all aspects of surgery. These contributions include, but are not limited to, original clinical studies, review articles, and experimental investigations with clear clinical relevance. In general, case reports are not considered for publication. As the official scientific journal of the American College of Surgeons, JACS has the goal of providing its readership the highest quality rapid retrieval of information relevant to surgeons.